Striper Talk Striped Bass Fishing, Surfcasting, Boating

     

Left Nav S-B Home FAQ Members List S-B on Facebook Arcade WEAX Tides Buoys Calendar Today's Posts Right Nav

Left Container Right Container
 

Go Back   Striper Talk Striped Bass Fishing, Surfcasting, Boating » Striper Chat - Discuss stuff other than fishing ~ The Scuppers and Political talk » The Scuppers

The Scuppers This is a new forum for the not necessarily fishing related topics...

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 09-01-2005, 05:28 PM   #31
"uffah!!"
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
"uffah!!"'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Cranston
Posts: 1,029
"President w/ Balls"

Nebe on the phone with his Political Adviser!!!

Last edited by "uffah!!"; 09-04-2006 at 10:14 AM..
"uffah!!" is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2005, 05:32 PM   #32
fishaholic18
Finally
iTrader: (0)
 
fishaholic18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: FL
Posts: 7,181
Nebe after hearing about Katrina,
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	rings01.jpg
Views:	128
Size:	28.4 KB
ID:	10525  

F-18®
It IsWhat It Is


¸.·´¯`·.¸><((((º>¸.·´¯`·.¸><((((º>¸.·´¯`·.¸><((((º >¸.·´¯`·.¸><((((º>¸.·´¯`·.¸><((((º>¸.·´¯`·.¸><(((( º>
fishaholic18 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2005, 05:34 PM   #33
fishaholic18
Finally
iTrader: (0)
 
fishaholic18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: FL
Posts: 7,181
Nebe and Bush are in Cahoots!
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	frodo_has_failed.jpg
Views:	149
Size:	75.0 KB
ID:	10526  

F-18®
It IsWhat It Is


¸.·´¯`·.¸><((((º>¸.·´¯`·.¸><((((º>¸.·´¯`·.¸><((((º >¸.·´¯`·.¸><((((º>¸.·´¯`·.¸><((((º>¸.·´¯`·.¸><(((( º>
fishaholic18 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2005, 06:13 PM   #34
Redsoxticket
...
iTrader: (0)
 
Redsoxticket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: MA/RI
Posts: 2,411
I can't imagine a president with balls but I know one that is a bush.
Redsoxticket is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2005, 09:31 PM   #35
spence
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
spence's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: RI
Posts: 21,464
Quote:
Originally Posted by Homerun04
Uh, correct me if I AM wrong but we KNOW for a fact they had / have WMD.....because they gased and killed over 100,000 Kurds a few years back, and Saddam is on trial for his life because of that......what, that doesn't count as WMD...???
No..it doesn't...

You guys should read "Chain of Command"...

-spence
spence is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2005, 09:43 PM   #36
Homerun04
Which Way Did They Go
iTrader: (0)
 
Homerun04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Blackstone, MA
Posts: 1,147
Send a message via AIM to Homerun04
Quote:
No..it doesn't...
Wrong Spence....biological AND chemical weapons DO count as WMD......

(1) "Weapon of mass destruction" includes chemical warfare agents, biological warfare agents, nuclear agents, or radiological agents, the intentional release of industrial agents as a weapon, or any destructive device or explosive in excess of five pounds or 2.26 kilograms. "Weapon of mass destruction" does not include the development, production, transfer, acquisition, retention, or possession of any biological agent, toxin, or delivery system utilized for prophylactic, protective, or peaceful purposes by any university, research institution, private individual, or hospital which is registered with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) pursuant to Part 113 (commencing with Section 113.1) of Subchapter E of Chapter 1 of Title 9 of the Code of Federal Regulations, or any successor provisions.

"You make a living by what you get. You make a life by what you give"
Homerun04 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2005, 09:44 PM   #37
spence
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
spence's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: RI
Posts: 21,464
Missing the point

Think...

-spence
spence is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2005, 09:45 PM   #38
Homerun04
Which Way Did They Go
iTrader: (0)
 
Homerun04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Blackstone, MA
Posts: 1,147
Send a message via AIM to Homerun04
Why don't you make it for me then............

"You make a living by what you get. You make a life by what you give"
Homerun04 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2005, 09:49 PM   #39
spence
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
spence's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: RI
Posts: 21,464
They were WMD, buit they don't count...

Think more...

-spence
spence is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2005, 09:50 PM   #40
Homerun04
Which Way Did They Go
iTrader: (0)
 
Homerun04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Blackstone, MA
Posts: 1,147
Send a message via AIM to Homerun04
Okay, why not.....? Because they were already used....???.....clue me in, oh wise one......

"You make a living by what you get. You make a life by what you give"
Homerun04 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-2005, 08:46 AM   #41
Nebe
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
Nebe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Libtardia
Posts: 21,692
BINGO...

we didnt go into Iraq because they 'had' WMD's..... we went in there because we were told they were in posession of them right now...

where are they????
Nebe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-2005, 09:35 AM   #42
Homerun04
Which Way Did They Go
iTrader: (0)
 
Homerun04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Blackstone, MA
Posts: 1,147
Send a message via AIM to Homerun04
Quote:
we didnt go into Iraq because they 'had' WMD's..... we went in there because we were told they were in posession of them right now...
Your logic is flawed.........as is the logic of everyone else who thinks this way.........because the Iraqi's had all the ELEMENTS to create WMD -- and because they had already assembled these elements in the past to create WMD and therefiore prove they had the capacity to rapidly develop these weapons -- then, by definition, THEY HAVE WMD......your logic is similar to not arresting someone who owns both a rocket as well as a nuclear warhead simply becaise they hadn't put the two together yet.......even if in the past they had put the two together and used them.

Another analogy for you to ponder: using heroine or cocaine is not illegal in the US, but BEING IN POSSESION OF IT is. Being in possesion of the technology to assemble WMD was against the UN mandates to Iraq......so no mattter how you look at it, they both had the technology and means to rapidly develop WMD -- and as a result -- by default -- this means they HAVE WMD..........

Last edited by Homerun04; 09-02-2005 at 09:42 AM..

"You make a living by what you get. You make a life by what you give"
Homerun04 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-2005, 02:46 PM   #43
Raven
........
iTrader: (0)
 
Raven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 22,805
Blog Entries: 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nebe
BINGO...

we didnt go into Iraq because they 'had' WMD's..... we went in there because we were told they were in posession of them right now...

where are they????
trucked into Iran for safe keeping
Raven is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-2005, 09:34 AM   #44
greenmeanie
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
greenmeanie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: CT
Posts: 52
pres

I would just like to have a PRES that would stop disarming us so we can protect ourselves from people like in New Orleans!
greenmeanie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-2005, 10:25 AM   #45
spence
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
spence's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: RI
Posts: 21,464
Quote:
Originally Posted by Homerun04
Your logic is flawed.........as is the logic of everyone else who thinks this way.........because the Iraqi's had all the ELEMENTS to create WMD -- and because they had already assembled these elements in the past to create WMD and therefiore prove they had the capacity to rapidly develop these weapons -- then, by definition, THEY HAVE WMD.
Homerun, your logic is seriously flawed

Unless there are useable stockpiles, the ability to produce is only meaningful if it can be done urgently. Beyond that it's a sliding scale of risk. Additionally there has to be a desire to have said WMD used in a terrorist act.

As bad as He has been in the past, we know today that there was never much credible information that indicated Saddam was a short-term threat on either count.

The laundry list of countries that have real stockpiles of WMD today is quite large. The list of nations with nuclear weapons or those that are close is growing quickly. Many of these countries have deep roots to terrorisim, and continue to pose a much larger threat than Saddam ever did.

The real tragedy of Iraq, is that this idiological detour has undermined the very institutions necessary to wage an effective war against the real enemy.

-spence
spence is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-2005, 11:31 AM   #46
Raven
........
iTrader: (0)
 
Raven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 22,805
Blog Entries: 1
Angry

agreed: quote: undermined the very institutions necessary to wage an effective war against the real enemy.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
the effective war....is never going to END....and all these mothers and anti war protesters don't seem to realize that this Particular WAR ,the war on terror is never , ever going to end...i am sad to say....but that is the stark reality that they refuse to face as painful as that may be...it's the ultimate truth. There is a jihad against America until their very last breath on until we are in the final war or until the day we call 'DOOMSDAY. Anyone who thinks
that they will quit...or that killing a certain number of leftover insurgents is going to end the conflict is wishfully thinking and is locked into a non realistic fantasy. if and when it ends over there it shall begin over here.
the real enemy is not in one place.....and have been placed strategically everywhere they could get a foothold and blend into the existing culture.
Raven is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-2005, 11:50 AM   #47
fishaholic18
Finally
iTrader: (0)
 
fishaholic18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: FL
Posts: 7,181
Sorry I started this thread.

F-18®
It IsWhat It Is


¸.·´¯`·.¸><((((º>¸.·´¯`·.¸><((((º>¸.·´¯`·.¸><((((º >¸.·´¯`·.¸><((((º>¸.·´¯`·.¸><((((º>¸.·´¯`·.¸><(((( º>
fishaholic18 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-2005, 12:19 PM   #48
Pete_G
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
Pete_G's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Newport, RI
Posts: 2,316
Quote:
Originally Posted by fishaholic18
Sorry I started this thread.
Don't be, discussion about where this nation has been and is going is healthy and necessary.

I wonder how history will look back on Katrina. It might even be a landmark shift in how we view our place on the globe realtive to everyone else. It's tough to say, but more then a few people on this board alone said something along the lines of "I'll never vote Republican again". Everyone should think outside of just Democrat and Republican. The 2 party system is antiquated anyway.
Pete_G is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-2005, 04:21 PM   #49
Homerun04
Which Way Did They Go
iTrader: (0)
 
Homerun04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Blackstone, MA
Posts: 1,147
Send a message via AIM to Homerun04
Spence - you and I see the world differently. I'll leave it at that.

"You make a living by what you get. You make a life by what you give"
Homerun04 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:41 PM.


Powered by vBulletin. Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Please use all necessary and proper safety precautions. STAY SAFE Striper Talk Forums
Copyright 1998-20012 Striped-Bass.com