|
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
StriperTalk! All things Striper |
 |
01-29-2006, 12:47 PM
|
#1
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: RI
Posts: 5,705
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by tlapinski
|
Good article.Certainly easier and a little cheaper to rig them according to the article.
I did notice no mention of adding weight(other than the hook).How well does this cast compared to the double hook weighted sluggo?
|
|
|
|
01-29-2006, 03:23 PM
|
#2
|
All up in the Interweb!
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: In the dog house.
Posts: 5,205
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by basswipe
Good article.Certainly easier and a little cheaper to rig them according to the article.
I did notice no mention of adding weight(other than the hook).How well does this cast compared to the double hook weighted sluggo?
|
They don't have quite as much weight rigged that way, but you can add weight if you want. The single hook on its own is heavier than the two hook combined. You really only need to add tail weight. When I rigged them this way, I seldom used weights. When I did, I would use nails. As #^^^^^^& said, they are not as dense as the lead so you need to use larger or more of them to get the same effect. It is, however, a viable option. I seriously doubt a bass will care if you use a nail or lead or if your rig weigh .02 ounces less than the guy standing next to you.
By the way, Tim Coleman uses the single hook method and he has taken some impressive fish over the years on slug-gos rigged this way.
|
Co-Host of The Surfcast Podcast
"Out there in the surf is where it's at, that's where the line gets drawn in the sand between those who talk fishing and those who live it."
- a wise man.
One good fish, a sharpie does not make...
Certified rock hopping billy goat.
|
|
|
01-29-2006, 07:41 PM
|
#3
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: RI
Posts: 5,705
|
[QUOTE=tlapinski]They don't have quite as much weight rigged that way, but you can add weight if you want. The single hook on its own is heavier than the two hook combined. You really only need to add tail weight. When I rigged them this way, I seldom used weights. When I did, I would use nails.
Access to nails is not a problem for me.They are in abundance all over the place on our sites!
I'm gonna rig up a few this week in weighted and unweighted.When we get a decent enough day I'll do a little experimenting.
|
|
|
|
01-29-2006, 07:52 PM
|
#4
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Libtardia
Posts: 21,692
|
just for the record, the lunker city nails are not lead. there might be a little bit of lead in them, but they are made out of a crappy alloy like a tire weight.
|
|
|
|
01-29-2006, 11:20 PM
|
#5
|
viva the plug-o-lution
Join Date: May 2002
Location: notsob
Posts: 3,476
|
ive used regular wood nails, they work. its nice having the sluggo ones though so you can break them if you think you need lees weight.
|
live to fish. fish to live. rod tips high.
|
|
|
01-30-2006, 06:52 AM
|
#6
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2000
Posts: 3,036
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by tlapinski
They don't have quite as much weight rigged that way, but you can add weight if you want. The single hook on its own is heavier than the two hook combined. You really only need to add tail weight. When I rigged them this way, I seldom used weights. When I did, I would use nails. As #^^^^^^& said, they are not as dense as the lead so you need to use larger or more of them to get the same effect. It is, however, a viable option. I seriously doubt a bass will care if you use a nail or lead or if your rig weigh .02 ounces less than the guy standing next to you.
By the way, Tim Coleman uses the single hook method and he has taken some impressive fish over the years on slug-gos rigged this way.
|
Toby, I agree the bass could care less but, I feel from seeing his results night after night, That the total package of the way Steve rigs them and fishes them works awesome. Could very well be that a minor change would take away from the action that he gets. So its the whole thing and not one thing that makes a difference. Tim has told me more than once that the only reason he does not rig them like steve is simply being lazy, while he has caught some impressive fish, the action is not the same . Steve has hit the perfect combination and total paclage that works perfect. As far as rigging them goes, once you get the hang of it its really easy and fast. Eben, you are right however there is something to it. Steve uses 3 of the large size could be the exact perfect weight..I dont know I just see the results..........Very Impressive.
So while a nail may seem like a minor difference, I think it could make all the difference in the overall action etc... But hey inovation and imagination are good and tinkering with the bait is half the fun, I have fished them with single and double, I prefer the double hook rig.
Still wont come close to a live eel  But then again...Nothing does................... You know Steve makes the comment at his shows, "No other artificial even comes close, the only thing better is the live eel" Thats a statement I agree with.
|
|
|
|
01-30-2006, 06:53 PM
|
#7
|
All up in the Interweb!
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: In the dog house.
Posts: 5,205
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by #^^^^^^&
So while a nail may seem like a minor difference, I think it could make all the difference in the overall action etc...
|
Why would a nail not work if it is the same mass as the slug-go weight?
|
Co-Host of The Surfcast Podcast
"Out there in the surf is where it's at, that's where the line gets drawn in the sand between those who talk fishing and those who live it."
- a wise man.
One good fish, a sharpie does not make...
Certified rock hopping billy goat.
|
|
|
01-30-2006, 07:00 PM
|
#8
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Libtardia
Posts: 21,692
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by tlapinski
Why would a nail not work if it is the same mass as the slug-go weight?
|
same mass different weight.
|
|
|
|
01-30-2006, 07:37 PM
|
#9
|
All up in the Interweb!
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: In the dog house.
Posts: 5,205
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nebe
same mass different weight.
|
But if it was same mass/size, it would be the same. No?
|
Co-Host of The Surfcast Podcast
"Out there in the surf is where it's at, that's where the line gets drawn in the sand between those who talk fishing and those who live it."
- a wise man.
One good fish, a sharpie does not make...
Certified rock hopping billy goat.
|
|
|
01-30-2006, 08:06 PM
|
#10
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Libtardia
Posts: 21,692
|
sure.. dont see why not
|
|
|
|
01-30-2006, 08:37 PM
|
#11
|
...
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: MA/RI
Posts: 2,411
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by tlapinski
But if it was same mass/size, it would be the same. No?
|
The weight of an object is defined as the force of gravity on the object and may be calculated as the mass times the acceleration of gravity, w = mg.
Weight of nail= (mass of nail) x (acceleration of gravity)
Like nebe said, in otther words the weight is different and so is the mass between the nail a lunker city nail since the acceleration of gravity (9.8 m/s sq.) is constant.
|
|
|
|
01-30-2006, 09:08 PM
|
#12
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Bethany CT
Posts: 2,883
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nebe
same mass different weight.
|
If the mass is the same, shouldn't the weight be the same, assuming both are on this planet? 
|
No, no, no. we’re 30… 30, three zero.
|
|
|
01-30-2006, 09:36 PM
|
#13
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Libtardia
Posts: 21,692
|
mass is the physical volume or bulk of a solid body. A nail made out of steel will never weigh as much as a nail made out of a heavier metal such as lead that is the same mass as the steel nail.
|
|
|
|
 |
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:32 PM.
|
| |