A different take on Iraq

[Nebe]

I know what is at stake and i would like to see things keep on keepin on over there. However, our current leadership base has proven time and time agian that they are inempt at proper decision making at so many different levels.

A democrat lead whitehouse will be much better at getting us out of this mess that has been created. Getting us out of this mess means not staying the course, but making INTELEGENT decisions and choices that hopefully will be based on the well being of the citizens of Iraq, and not based on which decisions will help US based contractors make the highest profits.

[stripersnipr]

Originally Posted by Nebe

I know what is at stake and i would like to see things keep on keepin on over there. However, our current leadership base has proven time and time agian that they are inempt at proper decision making at so many different levels.

A democrat lead whitehouse will be much better at getting us out of this mess that has been created. Getting us out of this mess means not staying the course, but making INTELEGENT decisions and choices that hopefully will be based on the well being of the citizens of Iraq, and not based on which decisions will help US based contractors make the highest profits.

I guess thats the difference. Some want "to get out of a mess" others want to win a War.

[spence]

Originally Posted by stripersnipr

I guess thats the difference. Some want "to get out of a mess" others want to win a War.

Pfffttttt...just fluffy manipulative rhetoric from page 33 of the GOP talking points.

On Meet the Press yesterday Sen. Dole actually had the stones to say that "Democrats were content with defeat" in Iraq.

I thought Russert was going to toss her out of the studio for insulting his debate with that BS. It's a crock and the American people are the loosers.


-spence

[stripersnipr]

Originally Posted by spence

Pfffttttt...just fluffy manipulative rhetoric from page 33 of the GOP talking points.

-spence

Yeah, kind of like: "Blood for Oil", "Bush Lied Troops Died", "Paid RNC Posters", "Hurricane conspiracies", "9/11 Conspiracies", Haliburton Conspiracies, :Big Oil Conspiracies", and all the rest of the Soros Mantra you guys provide us with. But it does provide normal people with some laughs.

[spence]

Originally Posted by stripersnipr

Yeah, kind of like: "Blood for Oil", "Bush Lied Troops Died", "Paid RNC Posters", "Hurricane conspiracies", "9/11 Conspiracies", Haliburton Conspiracies, :Big Oil Conspiracies", and all the rest of the Soros Mantra you guys provide us with. But it does provide normal people with some laughs.

You guys? Don't think I've been pushing those slogans.

Sounds like you've been had by the GOP and various shock-jock punditry. You see, not everyone who's critical of the Bush Administration is a radical liberal...

-spence

[stripersnipr]

Originally Posted by spence

You see, not everyone who's critical of the Bush Administration is a radical liberal...

-spence

Spence your absolutely right. The big fallacy Radical Liberals are banking on right now is their mistaken belief that if someone is critical of Bush they are in support of the far Left Wing ideology. Far from it. Moderate voters determine the outcome of all elections. The voice of moderate Democrats has been muffled by the high pitched screech of that far Left minority and its kind of a shame. And to deny that a portion of the "New" Democratic party would not be extremely satisified with a complete and immediate withdrawal from Iraq despite any potential consequences is just silly.

[spence]

Originally Posted by stripersnipr

The big fallacy Radical Liberals are banking on right now is their mistaken belief that if someone is critical of Bush they are in support of the far Left Wing ideology.

You just made that up didn't you.

-spence