Quote:
Originally Posted by ThrowingTimber
I wont even bother giving a theory too much thought, that doesnt account for losses.
So if in 1989 there were x amount of yoy, and they should be x length and weight by x year.
Where are the losses factored in?
I like the theory dont get me wrong just trying to bring up another point of view. Its almost like an IF nothing goes wrong with these fish theory?
Factor in a few metric tons of lost fish for the nets off nc and I'd be more onboard with the theory.
|
I think that the theory is including that...if year x had y amount of fish. and year x+1 had y+75 fish, then 10 years down the road, more fish from year X+1 should be around.
did that make any sense?
oke:
Threaded Mode