|
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
StriperTalk! All things Striper |
 |
01-29-2007, 09:00 AM
|
#1
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: jerseyshore
Posts: 4,949
|
Trust me on this ..
It is good to protect the pogies..
Write ur local representatives in support of this bill.
A list should be compiled an listed..
Large fishing groups an organizations should be herd from..
They listen to the votes..make it known u fish an u vote..
|
FORE!
It's usually darkest just before it turns Black..
|
|
|
01-29-2007, 10:31 AM
|
#2
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: marshfield,ma
Posts: 833
|
This is a very goood thing. Now how bout down in Virginia........ya right
|
|
|
|
01-29-2007, 10:35 AM
|
#3
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Holliston, Ma
Posts: 107
|
Hope it passes.
Now were talking . If you protect the bait the bass will survive. It's all about the habitat and the bait. FishHawk
|
|
|
|
01-29-2007, 10:39 AM
|
#4
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Cumberland, RI
Posts: 2,266
|
I agree, the bait should be protected. I also agree w/Eben though. The Surfacster will see little short term benefit (most likely detriment) as the fish last year were on the pogies in the bay.
|
Good judgement comes from experience, and experience comes from bad judgement -- Keith Benning
|
|
|
01-29-2007, 11:29 AM
|
#5
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2000
Posts: 3,036
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JFigliuolo
I agree, the bait should be protected. I also agree w/Eben though. The Surfacster will see little short term benefit (most likely detriment) as the fish last year were on the pogies in the bay.
|
I would think the overall good far outweighs a surfcaster not wanting the fish to follow the bait?? thats ridiculas, surfcasters will have to adapt and learn new places to fish, there is nothing wrong with fishing the bay and there are plenty of places to go, with a little effort and willingness to learn a new spots, the world does not revolve around gansett surf fisherman or from first rock to point judith...If this passes the bay will be like what it was a long time ago and, it was fantastic many many large bass were caught with regularity in the bay. This will change things no doubt but, for the good! From what I saw last year I wouldent move to South County now if I were paid to do so! It was that good, even with the bunker boat in the bay..Imagine without it!! everything has cycles and the pogies are back strong , with a little help they will thrive.
|
|
|
|
01-29-2007, 11:37 AM
|
#6
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,990
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by #^^^^^^&
I would think the overall good far outweighs a surfcaster not wanting the fish to follow the bait?? thats ridiculas, surfcasters will have to adapt and learn new places to fish, there is nothing wrong with fishing the bay and there are plenty of places to go, with a little effort and willingness to learn a new spots, the world does not revolve around gansett surf fisherman or from first rock to point judith...If this passes the bay will be like what it was a long time ago and, it was fantastic many many large bass were caught with regularity in the bay. This will change things no doubt but, for the good! From what I saw last year I wouldent move to South County now if I were paid to do so! It was that good, even with the bunker boat in the bay..Imagine without it!! everything has cycles and the pogies are back strong , with a little help they will thrive.
|
I agree 100% w/ what #^^^^^^& posted above. Although it may somewhat change the way everyone fishes, bringing bunker back in large #'s will outweigh (pun intended) any other effects.
In a few years you would also the see the effects on the ocean beaches
|
Sooner or later you're going to realize just as I did that there's a difference between knowing the path and walking the path. - Morpheus
|
|
|
01-29-2007, 11:51 AM
|
#7
|
Think of the fish
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: South County
Posts: 165
|
Cleaner Bay, more fish etc.
here we come.
#^^^^^^& has a good point about getting this to become law. You never know whats going to happen in the legislative process. However, these gents in the House that signed the bill are serious about the issue. They are committeed to getting this done and on the books. How do I know this you ask? I am proud to say that my brother is the co-sponsor. Hold on, this is going to be a good one. Kudo's to RISAA.
|
|
|
|
01-29-2007, 12:02 PM
|
#8
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Cumberland, RI
Posts: 2,266
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by #^^^^^^&
I would think the overall good far outweighs a surfcaster not wanting the fish to follow the bait?? thats ridiculas, surfcasters will have to adapt and learn new places to fish, there is nothing wrong with fishing the bay and there are plenty of places to go, with a little effort and willingness to learn a new spots, the world does not revolve around gansett surf fisherman or from first rock to point judith...If this passes the bay will be like what it was a long time ago and, it was fantastic many many large bass were caught with regularity in the bay. This will change things no doubt but, for the good! From what I saw last year I wouldent move to South County now if I were paid to do so! It was that good, even with the bunker boat in the bay..Imagine without it!! everything has cycles and the pogies are back strong , with a little help they will thrive.
|
I definitely agree w/the good outweighing the bad. I think I said that, or meant to. It just makes things a little more challenging for the shore bound. I don't quite see how you can disagree with that. Personally, I'm not a huge fan of flat water fishing. I prefer the open ocean. Doesn't mean I won't adapt, just means it's not my preference.
|
Good judgement comes from experience, and experience comes from bad judgement -- Keith Benning
|
|
|
01-29-2007, 12:22 PM
|
#9
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,990
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JFigliuolo
It just makes things a little more challenging for the shore bound. I don't quite see how you can disagree with that.
|
I do. Have you ever fished schools of bunker? Where theres bunker, theres fat hungry bass slamming just about anything you can put in front of them.
It makes pros out of goons, just look at me 
Only in NE would guys complain about bunker coming back
|
Sooner or later you're going to realize just as I did that there's a difference between knowing the path and walking the path. - Morpheus
|
|
|
01-29-2007, 01:44 PM
|
#10
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2000
Posts: 3,036
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JFigliuolo
I definitely agree w/the good outweighing the bad. I think I said that, or meant to. It just makes things a little more challenging for the shore bound. I don't quite see how you can disagree with that. Personally, I'm not a huge fan of flat water fishing. I prefer the open ocean. Doesn't mean I won't adapt, just means it's not my preference.
|
You must not have fished all that many years then, the presence of bunker make the shore fishing fantastic, in the 80s areas like fort Varnum were red hot due to all the bunker that were around, also you may want to take a closer look at the bay itself, there are plenty of places that have wave action, the bay goes all the way to its mouth at Beavertail light I would call that Surf in every sense of the word. The bay doesnt end at Conimicutt point...Anyway most of the 50lb fish landed in Rhode Island in the 70s and early 80s came from the bay and many of those came from shore fisherman..
This is a stupid argument and not on the right direction....The bottom line is that This bill is a great step forward and will benefit all fisherman.
|
|
|
|
 |
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:51 PM.
|
| |