|
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
StriperTalk! All things Striper |
 |
|
01-30-2007, 04:24 PM
|
#1
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Newtown, CT
Posts: 5,659
|
what would you like to see in a licensing system
I don't want to divert the menhaden bill thread so I'll start a new one.
You may or may not know that the recently enacted Magnesson-Stevens act calls for a "registry" of saltwater anglers to be established and for the feds to work with the states in developing state licensing plans that the feds can use for their registry. New Hampshire has already cited that provision while defending its current salt water licensing proposal. I have some views on the issue, but beofre I state my views I would like ot hear what everyone else thinks. what say you?
|
|
|
|
01-30-2007, 04:28 PM
|
#2
|
end of the fence guy
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: tiverton ri
Posts: 749
|
i hope with the revenue the licences bring in we can get some wardens out and checking for short fish
|
|
|
|
01-30-2007, 04:32 PM
|
#3
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Plymouth, Ma
Posts: 1,405
|
Thats easy. 100% return of licensing fee's to fisheries protection. But what we can expect is the promise of that minus the 95% cost of administering the licensing program.
|
|
|
|
01-30-2007, 04:36 PM
|
#4
|
Seal Control
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Caver, Ma.
Posts: 3,875
|
All moneys stay in the fishery, More Wardens, More access to the water, Dragger's out past 3 mile limit, Only hook fishing inshore to protect the inshore fishery!
|
"All my friends are Flakes!!"
BOATLESS
|
|
|
01-30-2007, 04:40 PM
|
#5
|
It's about respect baby!
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: ri
Posts: 6,358
|
Enforcement 
|
Domination takes full concentration..
|
|
|
01-30-2007, 04:46 PM
|
#6
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: newport
Posts: 1,136
|
NO LICENSE. There are not enough people now to enforce the regulations,there certainly will not be enough money to hire enough officers to go through the exercise of checking all of the fishermen out there.The ocean is there for all of us to fish ,we should not need permission from the state to do so.
|
|
|
|
01-30-2007, 04:47 PM
|
#7
|
Canceled
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: vt
Posts: 13,425
|
Let's see, I live in VT and last year fished in ME, NH, Mass, RI and NY.
How much will this cost me? Which states will go first cause they will be the first off my list for economic reasons.
|
Frasier: Niles, I’ve just had the most marvelous idea for a website! People will post their opinions, cheeky bon mots, and insights, and others will reply in kind!
Niles: You have met “people”, haven’t you?
Lets Go Darwin
|
|
|
01-30-2007, 04:50 PM
|
#8
|
President - S-B Chapter - Kelly Clarkson Fan Club
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Rowley
Posts: 3,781
|
a salt water license is riddled with problems, not the least of which is that it is just basically another tax we will have to pay that will most likley just go into a general fund and maybe 1% will go towards our already underfunded wildlife enforcement. It's like, we pay 5% in Mass in sales tax at the B&T and the license fee, same thing.
|
|
|
|
01-30-2007, 04:56 PM
|
#9
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 5,945
|
ACCESS.. Keep what we have open and get more back..
And by Access, I mean, ORV, foot, and the ability to launch a boat.
More Parking.. for fishermen, More Ramps, and areas to park your rig with trailer, hassle free.
Enforcement of existing laws, i.e. poachers, and highgraders..
And Education, so people know the laws....
Also.. the $ should go into a dedicated fund.. for DEM, or F&W.. whoever is going to enforce the regs.. NO GENERAL FUND.. if the $ goes into the GF.. not one penny will come back to the fishermen...
|
|
|
|
01-30-2007, 05:12 PM
|
#10
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: S. Yarmouth, MA
Posts: 1,604
|
I was thinking along the lines of bluefishercat and maybe reciprocity should be considered. I guess the funds could go to the state in which the license was bought, but going to another state wouldn't mean buying a new license, just obeying thelaws of that state.
|
|
|
|
01-30-2007, 05:58 PM
|
#11
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 374
|
I think the best case would be if the states used the money for enforcement, education, clean ups, etc. But I don't think that will happen. I'm not trying to be senselessly negative, but NJ, MA, RI haven't historically done a very good job of spending money on society's "givers".
So, assuming the money will be wasted anyway, I'd rather there be a federal license so that fishers can move between states without needing separate licenses with as small a fee as possible. If the registration is done online, meaning no people are involved, my Kentucky windage math says the license should cost about $5.
|
|
|
|
01-30-2007, 06:01 PM
|
#12
|
...
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: MA/RI
Posts: 2,411
|
Here is an idea, the rec. license will allow that the holder of such license to sell their fish to regulated seafood buyers with a percentage of the monies going back to the fund.
|
|
|
|
01-30-2007, 06:39 PM
|
#13
|
........
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 22,805
|
i was thinking of a federal license to fish in any states waters.
that way.... a lawbreaker (poacher) can't fish anywhere without it.
otherwise... no salt license at all.
and....
a web site to report violators and submit photo's too
...even short video's of violators and or poachers in the act.
just my .04 cents
and what Karl Said 
Last edited by Raven; 01-30-2007 at 06:53 PM..
|
|
|
|
01-30-2007, 06:50 PM
|
#14
|
BigFish Bait Co.
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Hanover
Posts: 23,392
|
Funny....the thought have having to pay another fee to fish in the ocean! I pay $150.00 to fish Race Point (when I can get out there because of the freakin birds).......so on top of that I will have to pay another fee? How about the guys with boats??? They have the boat payment, gas, insurance, maintenance, slip fees if they have them and....oh yeah.....now they will have to pay for the priviledge of fishing off the side of their boat!?!?!?!?! Sorry....I think some things in life should be unencumbered and.....FREE!!!! Like fishing!!!! When is enough enough??? Us poor shore guys can't get enough freakin access as it is and they are gonna want us to pay for the right to fish the few places we can go now???? They want to open up more access to folks to fish from shore.....I am all for it but as it stands now.....NOPE! 
|
Almost time to get our fish on!!!
|
|
|
01-30-2007, 07:55 PM
|
#15
|
Finally
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: FL
Posts: 7,181
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigFish
Funny....the thought have having to pay another fee to fish in the ocean! I pay $150.00 to fish Race Point (when I can get out there because of the freakin birds).......so on top of that I will have to pay another fee? How about the guys with boats??? They have the boat payment, gas, insurance, maintenance, slip fees if they have them and....oh yeah.....now they will have to pay for the priviledge of fishing off the side of their boat!?!?!?!?! Sorry....I think some things in life should be unencumbered and.....FREE!!!! Like fishing!!!! When is enough enough??? Us poor shore guys can't get enough freakin access as it is and they are gonna want us to pay for the right to fish the few places we can go now???? They want to open up more access to folks to fish from shore.....I am all for it but as it stands now.....NOPE! 
|
%$#@! 'em Larry, let 'em find us.. 
|
F-18®
It IsWhat It Is
¸.·´Ż`·.¸><((((ş>¸.·´Ż`·.¸><((((ş>¸.·´Ż`·.¸><((((ş >¸.·´Ż`·.¸><((((ş>¸.·´Ż`·.¸><((((ş>¸.·´Ż`·.¸><(((( ş>
|
|
|
01-30-2007, 08:05 PM
|
#16
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Newport, RI
Posts: 2,316
|
Read my signature.
In other words, the federal gov't can screw.
Some things were just meant to be public and free.
|
|
|
|
01-30-2007, 08:18 PM
|
#17
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 629
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pete_G
Read my signature.
In other words, the federal gov't can screw.
Some things were just meant to be public and free.
|
NIIIIIIIIIIICE,Pete.It was only a couple months ago they refused to change our constitution for a casino.
|
|
|
|
01-30-2007, 08:18 PM
|
#18
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Cape Cod
Posts: 172
|
You need a license to hunt bambi and friends , a license for freshwater and soon ( so it seems) one for Saltwater. One day you will need a license to get a license.....
|
|
|
|
01-30-2007, 08:25 PM
|
#19
|
Super Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Middleboro MA
Posts: 17,125
|
I am against a saltwater license but if they pass the law for one, then it should be one federal nationwide license, not state.
And what Big K said
Quote:
Originally Posted by Karl F
ACCESS.. Keep what we have open and get more back..
And by Access, I mean, ORV, foot, and the ability to launch a boat.
More Parking.. for fishermen, More Ramps, and areas to park your rig with trailer, hassle free.
Enforcement of existing laws, i.e. poachers, and highgraders..
And Education, so people know the laws....
Also.. the $ should go into a dedicated fund.. for DEM, or F&W.. whoever is going to enforce the regs.. NO GENERAL FUND.. if the $ goes into the GF.. not one penny will come back to the fishermen...
|
A license will most likely hurt the economy by discouraging the casual rec fisher from bothering to buy fishing stuff to only go on a whim or once or twice a year, so it better not be a lot of dough to buy one , or it should last 2 or 3 years maybe.
|
The United States Constitution does not exist to grant you rights; those rights are inherent within you. Rather it exists to frame a limited government so that those natural rights can be exercised freely.
1984 was a warning, not a guidebook!
It's time more people spoke up with the truth. Every time we let a leftist lie go uncorrected, the commies get stronger.
|
|
|
01-30-2007, 08:49 PM
|
#20
|
Seal Control
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Caver, Ma.
Posts: 3,875
|
I going to fish with out it!! If they no like they can put me in Jail and feed me 3 times a day for free, O yea and put my kids on there pay roll also!
I No PAY!! 
|
"All my friends are Flakes!!"
BOATLESS
|
|
|
01-30-2007, 09:27 PM
|
#21
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 179
|
no way do we need to pay to fish in our bay,,, can you see the wait at the boat ramps,,,, just don't see what it would do for me
|
take your kids fishing
|
|
|
01-30-2007, 10:13 PM
|
#22
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2000
Posts: 3,036
|
As much as I am against it, it is coming so like it or not may as well shoot for something positive, I would rather see a state licence so long as the money generated goes into perserving and maintaining the marines fisheries, they just want to put the money in the "General fund" to bail out other areas.Thats why it failed last time..
But I do think the Ocean should be free to fish.....
|
|
|
|
01-30-2007, 10:59 PM
|
#23
|
Soggy Bottom Boy
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Billerica, Ma.
Posts: 7,260
|
The only reason I don't like the idea is that I don't want to have to buy a lic. for every state I fish in 3 fresh water Lic. 3 saltwater lic. it gets costly
It is just another way for big brother to keep track of us, and remember only the honest people follow the rules.
|
Surfcasting Full Throttle
Don't judge me Monkey
Recreational Surfcaster 99.9% C&R
|
|
|
01-30-2007, 11:24 PM
|
#24
|
...
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: MA/RI
Posts: 2,411
|
Instead of a license for everyone, the money can be raised by increasing the fees for boaters since they use more of the states resources as oppose to a man or child that just wants to catch a few fish from the shoreline.
Having said that.
I'll oppose any salt water license and any increase in boater fees.
|
|
|
|
01-30-2007, 11:40 PM
|
#25
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Burlington
Posts: 2,290
|
What Karl said................ 
|
low & slow 37
|
|
|
01-31-2007, 08:23 AM
|
#26
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: in a structure with a roof
Posts: 6,049
|
a license is only one ,ore tax that will never go back into the fisheries . just like freshwater , clamming etc etc all goes into general fund so they can waste it .
I carry way to many now and there are a # I dont have .
How come there isnt a license for people to be parents and even a test . I know I wouldnt have passed .
|
|
|
|
01-31-2007, 09:30 AM
|
#27
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Newtown, CT
Posts: 5,659
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Redsoxticket
Instead of a license for everyone, the money can be raised by increasing the fees for boaters since they use more of the states resources as oppose to a man or child that just wants to catch a few fish from the shoreline.
Having said that.
I'll oppose any salt water license and any increase in boater fees.
|
RST,
Not singleng you out, but your post seems to representative of some of the posts on this thread. I don't know what I have to do to get through to you guys ITS ALREADY PASSED, IT"S THE LAW, YOU DON'T HAVE A CHOICE AS TO WHETHER OR NOT THERE WILL BE A LICENSE What I'm trying to get a feel for is what would you like the licensing system to be like. While we have lost the battle over whether or not we should have a license we can influence what the system will ultimately look like.
|
|
|
|
01-31-2007, 09:35 AM
|
#28
|
Also known as OAK
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Westlery, RI
Posts: 10,408
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Redsoxticket
Instead of a license for everyone, the money can be raised by increasing the fees for boaters since they use more of the states resources as oppose to a man or child that just wants to catch a few fish from the shoreline.
Having said that.
I'll oppose any salt water license and any increase in boater fees.
|
Vic;
you have got to be sh-tting me!
Fees for boaters only?
The mindset of 'he has a boat he can afford it?'
What about taxes, registrations, safety equipment, gas etc.. and you think guys in boats should pay more? What about the man or child that wants to take his 13ft whaler out and catch a few fish... I live for the surf but spend a fair amount of time boating as well... thats beyond ignorant...
Like most have said I'm not pro-license, but if it is passed as a law then so be it. I go to Florida, I pay the fee to fish. for people to say they aren't going to pay, good luck, hopefully the license pays for more enforcement, just hope you don't get caught. 'I wont pay until all dragger's are 3mi out isnt a viable defense....)
|
Bryan
Originally Posted by #^^^^^^^^^^^&
"For once I agree with Spence. UGH. I just hope I don't get the urge to go start buying armani suits to wear in my shop"
|
|
|
01-31-2007, 10:16 AM
|
#29
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Cumberland, RI
Posts: 2,264
|
I Hope they don't shaft out of staters... F'ng stickey fingered B@$tards.
|
Good judgement comes from experience, and experience comes from bad judgement -- Keith Benning
|
|
|
01-31-2007, 10:30 AM
|
#30
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Ocean County , N.J.
Posts: 262
|
Personally I just do not trust any federal,state or local goverment to use the entire proceeds of a fishing license towards our fishery..
Somehow,Someway those funds will get lost somewhere.....
It would be great to see the funds go into better law enforcement
and to help protect the enviorment inwhich we fish,not to mention
research to help protect and continue our fisheries for the future...
Prove to me that these things will be 100% completely funded buy this additionial fee/tax ,and I will signup and be pro-active about it around my home waters....
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:43 PM.
|
| |