Striper Talk Striped Bass Fishing, Surfcasting, Boating

     

Left Nav S-B Home FAQ Members List S-B on Facebook Arcade WEAX Tides Buoys Calendar Today's Posts Right Nav

Left Container Right Container
 

Go Back   Striper Talk Striped Bass Fishing, Surfcasting, Boating » Main Forum » StriperTalk!

StriperTalk! All things Striper

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-30-2007, 04:24 PM   #1
MakoMike
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
MakoMike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Newtown, CT
Posts: 5,659
what would you like to see in a licensing system

I don't want to divert the menhaden bill thread so I'll start a new one.

You may or may not know that the recently enacted Magnesson-Stevens act calls for a "registry" of saltwater anglers to be established and for the feds to work with the states in developing state licensing plans that the feds can use for their registry. New Hampshire has already cited that provision while defending its current salt water licensing proposal. I have some views on the issue, but beofre I state my views I would like ot hear what everyone else thinks. what say you?

****MakoMike****

Http://www.Makomania.net

Official S-B Sponsor
MakoMike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2007, 04:28 PM   #2
snake slinger
end of the fence guy
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: tiverton ri
Posts: 749
i hope with the revenue the licences bring in we can get some wardens out and checking for short fish
snake slinger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2007, 04:32 PM   #3
stripersnipr
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
stripersnipr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Plymouth, Ma
Posts: 1,405
Thats easy. 100% return of licensing fee's to fisheries protection. But what we can expect is the promise of that minus the 95% cost of administering the licensing program.
stripersnipr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2007, 04:36 PM   #4
macojoe
Seal Control
iTrader: (1)
 
macojoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Caver, Ma.
Posts: 3,875
Send a message via AIM to macojoe Send a message via Yahoo to macojoe
All moneys stay in the fishery, More Wardens, More access to the water, Dragger's out past 3 mile limit, Only hook fishing inshore to protect the inshore fishery!

"All my friends are Flakes!!"

BOATLESS
macojoe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2007, 04:40 PM   #5
ThrowingTimber
It's about respect baby!
iTrader: (0)
 
ThrowingTimber's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: ri
Posts: 6,358
Blog Entries: 1
Enforcement

Domination takes full concentration..
ThrowingTimber is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2007, 04:46 PM   #6
Pt.JudeJoe
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
Pt.JudeJoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: newport
Posts: 1,136
NO LICENSE. There are not enough people now to enforce the regulations,there certainly will not be enough money to hire enough officers to go through the exercise of checking all of the fishermen out there.The ocean is there for all of us to fish ,we should not need permission from the state to do so.
Pt.JudeJoe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2007, 04:47 PM   #7
Pete F.
Canceled
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: vt
Posts: 13,425
Let's see, I live in VT and last year fished in ME, NH, Mass, RI and NY.
How much will this cost me? Which states will go first cause they will be the first off my list for economic reasons.

Frasier: Niles, I’ve just had the most marvelous idea for a website! People will post their opinions, cheeky bon mots, and insights, and others will reply in kind!

Niles: You have met “people”, haven’t you?

Lets Go Darwin
Pete F. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2007, 04:50 PM   #8
Rockport24
President - S-B Chapter - Kelly Clarkson Fan Club
iTrader: (0)
 
Rockport24's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Rowley
Posts: 3,781
a salt water license is riddled with problems, not the least of which is that it is just basically another tax we will have to pay that will most likley just go into a general fund and maybe 1% will go towards our already underfunded wildlife enforcement. It's like, we pay 5% in Mass in sales tax at the B&T and the license fee, same thing.
Rockport24 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2007, 04:56 PM   #9
Karl F
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
Karl F's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 5,945
ACCESS.. Keep what we have open and get more back..
And by Access, I mean, ORV, foot, and the ability to launch a boat.
More Parking.. for fishermen, More Ramps, and areas to park your rig with trailer, hassle free.
Enforcement of existing laws, i.e. poachers, and highgraders..
And Education, so people know the laws....
Also.. the $ should go into a dedicated fund.. for DEM, or F&W.. whoever is going to enforce the regs.. NO GENERAL FUND.. if the $ goes into the GF.. not one penny will come back to the fishermen...
Karl F is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2007, 05:12 PM   #10
Jimbo
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: S. Yarmouth, MA
Posts: 1,604
I was thinking along the lines of bluefishercat and maybe reciprocity should be considered. I guess the funds could go to the state in which the license was bought, but going to another state wouldn't mean buying a new license, just obeying thelaws of that state.
Jimbo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2007, 05:58 PM   #11
wheresmy50
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 374
I think the best case would be if the states used the money for enforcement, education, clean ups, etc. But I don't think that will happen. I'm not trying to be senselessly negative, but NJ, MA, RI haven't historically done a very good job of spending money on society's "givers".

So, assuming the money will be wasted anyway, I'd rather there be a federal license so that fishers can move between states without needing separate licenses with as small a fee as possible. If the registration is done online, meaning no people are involved, my Kentucky windage math says the license should cost about $5.
wheresmy50 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2007, 06:01 PM   #12
Redsoxticket
...
iTrader: (0)
 
Redsoxticket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: MA/RI
Posts: 2,411
Here is an idea, the rec. license will allow that the holder of such license to sell their fish to regulated seafood buyers with a percentage of the monies going back to the fund.
Redsoxticket is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2007, 06:39 PM   #13
Raven
........
iTrader: (0)
 
Raven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 22,805
Blog Entries: 1
i was thinking of a federal license to fish in any states waters.
that way.... a lawbreaker (poacher) can't fish anywhere without it.
otherwise... no salt license at all.

and....
a web site to report violators and submit photo's too
...even short video's of violators and or poachers in the act.

just my .04 cents

and what Karl Said

Last edited by Raven; 01-30-2007 at 06:53 PM..
Raven is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2007, 06:50 PM   #14
BigFish
BigFish Bait Co.
iTrader: (1)
 
BigFish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Hanover
Posts: 23,392
Send a message via AIM to BigFish
Funny....the thought have having to pay another fee to fish in the ocean! I pay $150.00 to fish Race Point (when I can get out there because of the freakin birds).......so on top of that I will have to pay another fee? How about the guys with boats??? They have the boat payment, gas, insurance, maintenance, slip fees if they have them and....oh yeah.....now they will have to pay for the priviledge of fishing off the side of their boat!?!?!?!?! Sorry....I think some things in life should be unencumbered and.....FREE!!!! Like fishing!!!! When is enough enough??? Us poor shore guys can't get enough freakin access as it is and they are gonna want us to pay for the right to fish the few places we can go now???? They want to open up more access to folks to fish from shore.....I am all for it but as it stands now.....NOPE!

Almost time to get our fish on!!!
BigFish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2007, 07:55 PM   #15
fishaholic18
Finally
iTrader: (0)
 
fishaholic18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: FL
Posts: 7,181
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigFish View Post
Funny....the thought have having to pay another fee to fish in the ocean! I pay $150.00 to fish Race Point (when I can get out there because of the freakin birds).......so on top of that I will have to pay another fee? How about the guys with boats??? They have the boat payment, gas, insurance, maintenance, slip fees if they have them and....oh yeah.....now they will have to pay for the priviledge of fishing off the side of their boat!?!?!?!?! Sorry....I think some things in life should be unencumbered and.....FREE!!!! Like fishing!!!! When is enough enough??? Us poor shore guys can't get enough freakin access as it is and they are gonna want us to pay for the right to fish the few places we can go now???? They want to open up more access to folks to fish from shore.....I am all for it but as it stands now.....NOPE!
%$#@! 'em Larry, let 'em find us..

F-18®
It IsWhat It Is


¸.·´Ż`·.¸><((((ş>¸.·´Ż`·.¸><((((ş>¸.·´Ż`·.¸><((((ş >¸.·´Ż`·.¸><((((ş>¸.·´Ż`·.¸><((((ş>¸.·´Ż`·.¸><(((( ş>
fishaholic18 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2007, 08:05 PM   #16
Pete_G
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
Pete_G's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Newport, RI
Posts: 2,316
Read my signature.

In other words, the federal gov't can screw.

Some things were just meant to be public and free.
Pete_G is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2007, 08:18 PM   #17
animal
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 629
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pete_G View Post
Read my signature.

In other words, the federal gov't can screw.

Some things were just meant to be public and free.
NIIIIIIIIIIICE,Pete.It was only a couple months ago they refused to change our constitution for a casino.
animal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2007, 08:18 PM   #18
Tburg
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
Tburg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Cape Cod
Posts: 172
You need a license to hunt bambi and friends , a license for freshwater and soon ( so it seems) one for Saltwater. One day you will need a license to get a license.....
Tburg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2007, 08:25 PM   #19
Slipknot
Super Moderator
iTrader: (0)
 
Slipknot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Middleboro MA
Posts: 17,125
I am against a saltwater license but if they pass the law for one, then it should be one federal nationwide license, not state.

And what Big K said


Quote:
Originally Posted by Karl F View Post
ACCESS.. Keep what we have open and get more back..
And by Access, I mean, ORV, foot, and the ability to launch a boat.
More Parking.. for fishermen, More Ramps, and areas to park your rig with trailer, hassle free.
Enforcement of existing laws, i.e. poachers, and highgraders..
And Education, so people know the laws....
Also.. the $ should go into a dedicated fund.. for DEM, or F&W.. whoever is going to enforce the regs.. NO GENERAL FUND.. if the $ goes into the GF.. not one penny will come back to the fishermen...

A license will most likely hurt the economy by discouraging the casual rec fisher from bothering to buy fishing stuff to only go on a whim or once or twice a year, so it better not be a lot of dough to buy one , or it should last 2 or 3 years maybe.

The United States Constitution does not exist to grant you rights; those rights are inherent within you. Rather it exists to frame a limited government so that those natural rights can be exercised freely.

1984 was a warning, not a guidebook!

It's time more people spoke up with the truth. Every time we let a leftist lie go uncorrected, the commies get stronger.
Slipknot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2007, 08:49 PM   #20
macojoe
Seal Control
iTrader: (1)
 
macojoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Caver, Ma.
Posts: 3,875
Send a message via AIM to macojoe Send a message via Yahoo to macojoe
I going to fish with out it!! If they no like they can put me in Jail and feed me 3 times a day for free, O yea and put my kids on there pay roll also!

I No PAY!!

"All my friends are Flakes!!"

BOATLESS
macojoe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2007, 09:27 PM   #21
fishermanjim
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
fishermanjim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 179
no way do we need to pay to fish in our bay,,, can you see the wait at the boat ramps,,,, just don't see what it would do for me

take your kids fishing
fishermanjim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2007, 10:13 PM   #22
eelman
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Posts: 3,036
As much as I am against it, it is coming so like it or not may as well shoot for something positive, I would rather see a state licence so long as the money generated goes into perserving and maintaining the marines fisheries, they just want to put the money in the "General fund" to bail out other areas.Thats why it failed last time..

But I do think the Ocean should be free to fish.....
eelman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2007, 10:59 PM   #23
tattoobob
Soggy Bottom Boy
iTrader: (0)
 
tattoobob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Billerica, Ma.
Posts: 7,260
The only reason I don't like the idea is that I don't want to have to buy a lic. for every state I fish in 3 fresh water Lic. 3 saltwater lic. it gets costly

It is just another way for big brother to keep track of us, and remember only the honest people follow the rules.

Surfcasting Full Throttle

Don't judge me Monkey

Recreational Surfcaster 99.9% C&R
tattoobob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2007, 11:24 PM   #24
Redsoxticket
...
iTrader: (0)
 
Redsoxticket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: MA/RI
Posts: 2,411
Instead of a license for everyone, the money can be raised by increasing the fees for boaters since they use more of the states resources as oppose to a man or child that just wants to catch a few fish from the shoreline.

Having said that.
I'll oppose any salt water license and any increase in boater fees.
Redsoxticket is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2007, 11:40 PM   #25
gone fishin
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
gone fishin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Burlington
Posts: 2,290
What Karl said................

low & slow 37
gone fishin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2007, 08:23 AM   #26
chris L
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
chris L's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: in a structure with a roof
Posts: 6,049
a license is only one ,ore tax that will never go back into the fisheries . just like freshwater , clamming etc etc all goes into general fund so they can waste it .

I carry way to many now and there are a # I dont have .

How come there isnt a license for people to be parents and even a test . I know I wouldnt have passed .
chris L is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2007, 09:30 AM   #27
MakoMike
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
MakoMike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Newtown, CT
Posts: 5,659
Quote:
Originally Posted by Redsoxticket View Post
Instead of a license for everyone, the money can be raised by increasing the fees for boaters since they use more of the states resources as oppose to a man or child that just wants to catch a few fish from the shoreline.

Having said that.
I'll oppose any salt water license and any increase in boater fees.
RST,
Not singleng you out, but your post seems to representative of some of the posts on this thread. I don't know what I have to do to get through to you guys ITS ALREADY PASSED, IT"S THE LAW, YOU DON'T HAVE A CHOICE AS TO WHETHER OR NOT THERE WILL BE A LICENSE What I'm trying to get a feel for is what would you like the licensing system to be like. While we have lost the battle over whether or not we should have a license we can influence what the system will ultimately look like.

****MakoMike****

Http://www.Makomania.net

Official S-B Sponsor
MakoMike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2007, 09:35 AM   #28
RIROCKHOUND
Also known as OAK
iTrader: (0)
 
RIROCKHOUND's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Westlery, RI
Posts: 10,408
Quote:
Originally Posted by Redsoxticket View Post
Instead of a license for everyone, the money can be raised by increasing the fees for boaters since they use more of the states resources as oppose to a man or child that just wants to catch a few fish from the shoreline.

Having said that.
I'll oppose any salt water license and any increase in boater fees.
Vic;
you have got to be sh-tting me!
Fees for boaters only?
The mindset of 'he has a boat he can afford it?'
What about taxes, registrations, safety equipment, gas etc.. and you think guys in boats should pay more? What about the man or child that wants to take his 13ft whaler out and catch a few fish... I live for the surf but spend a fair amount of time boating as well... thats beyond ignorant...

Like most have said I'm not pro-license, but if it is passed as a law then so be it. I go to Florida, I pay the fee to fish. for people to say they aren't going to pay, good luck, hopefully the license pays for more enforcement, just hope you don't get caught. 'I wont pay until all dragger's are 3mi out isnt a viable defense....)

Bryan

Originally Posted by #^&#^&#^&#^&#^&#^&#^&#^&#^&#^&#^&
"For once I agree with Spence. UGH. I just hope I don't get the urge to go start buying armani suits to wear in my shop"
RIROCKHOUND is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2007, 10:16 AM   #29
JFigliuolo
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
JFigliuolo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Cumberland, RI
Posts: 2,264
I Hope they don't shaft out of staters... F'ng stickey fingered B@$tards.

Good judgement comes from experience, and experience comes from bad judgement -- Keith Benning
JFigliuolo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2007, 10:30 AM   #30
NIGHT STRIKES
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
NIGHT STRIKES's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Ocean County , N.J.
Posts: 262
Personally I just do not trust any federal,state or local goverment to use the entire proceeds of a fishing license towards our fishery..

Somehow,Someway those funds will get lost somewhere.....

It would be great to see the funds go into better law enforcement
and to help protect the enviorment inwhich we fish,not to mention
research to help protect and continue our fisheries for the future...

Prove to me that these things will be 100% completely funded buy this additionial fee/tax ,and I will signup and be pro-active about it around my home waters....
NIGHT STRIKES is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:43 PM.


Powered by vBulletin. Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Please use all necessary and proper safety precautions. STAY SAFE Striper Talk Forums
Copyright 1998-20012 Striped-Bass.com