|
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Political Threads This section is for Political Threads - Enter at your own risk. If you say you don't want to see what someone posts - don't read it :hihi: |
03-07-2007, 08:22 AM
|
#1
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Libtardia
Posts: 21,711
|
spence took the words out of my mouth yet agian.. fall guy.
at least the bush administration has finally been held acountable for something.
|
|
|
|
03-07-2007, 08:25 AM
|
#2
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Cranston
Posts: 1,029
|
Sorry to say, but, this time I agree with everything said. I think that it has been Cheney all along.
Last edited by "uffah!!"; 03-07-2007 at 10:42 AM..
|
"Non temere mai Roma, il serpente rimane attorcigliato a Napoli!"
"Baci Mio Culo"
|
|
|
03-07-2007, 08:30 AM
|
#3
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 374
|
"Well, they got the right guy...from a legal standpoint under the scope of the investigation."
How do you figure that?
He was convicted of purjury, not for the original crime (i.e. the scope of the investigation).
From what I've read, several people had inconsistencies in their testimony, but they went after Libby and not the rest. If that's true, it does raise some questions.
|
|
|
|
03-07-2007, 09:58 AM
|
#4
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: RI
Posts: 21,496
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by wheresmy50
How do you figure that?
He was convicted of purjury, not for the original crime (i.e. the scope of the investigation).
From what I've read, several people had inconsistencies in their testimony, but they went after Libby and not the rest. If that's true, it does raise some questions.
|
Libby was found guilty of obstructing justice (etc...) in the original investigation...just because there were not other indictments could mean there weren't other crimes, or the prosecutor didn't feel he had a strong enough case to bring to a grand jury.
Think about it, if you're going to go after Rove for instance...you'd better know you're going to win.
-spence
|
|
|
|
03-07-2007, 10:47 AM
|
#5
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Cranston
Posts: 1,029
|
Well why shouldn't Bush pardon him? Clinton pardoned every Tom,#^^^^&,and Harry before he left office , at $100,000 each
Its no wonder he's worth millions now!!
,
Last edited by "uffah!!"; 03-07-2007 at 11:08 AM..
|
"Non temere mai Roma, il serpente rimane attorcigliato a Napoli!"
"Baci Mio Culo"
|
|
|
03-07-2007, 10:54 AM
|
#6
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: RI
Posts: 21,496
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by "uffah!!"
Well why shouldn't Bush pardon him? Clinton pardoned every Tom,#^^^^&,and Harry before he left office , at $100,00.00 each
Its no wonder he's worth millions now!!
,
|
Clinton certainly had some pardons deserving of negative critique.
But to say this is justification for a Bush pardon for Libby, a man who's guilty of lying to cover up the marketing effort for the war...is just stoopid talk.
-spence
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:26 PM.
|
| |