Quote:
Originally Posted by stripersnipr
"I's been reported"? Sounds like spin to me.
|
Follow the link, read the quotes, do some work instead of just ignoring the evidence and reciting anything,
anything you can scrounge up to obfuscate the situation.
Did Clinton mislead Congress as to the motivation for his firings? Did Clinton dismiss prosecutors mid-term so the rest had to watch their backs? When Reagan or Bush 41 or Bush 43 did the same thing did they interrupt any existing cases against government officials?
I'd bet they did.
Quote:
|
How about Jay Stephens who was midway through an investigation of Ways and Means Chairman Dan Rostenkowski who was indicted and convicted (and later pardoned of course) despite Clintons best effort to protect him. Does the fact he was one of 92 excuse that? Just routine right?
|
Clinton's own appointed replacement continued the investigation, indicted and convicted Rostenkowski!
The prosecutors appointed from both parties did their jobs in enforcing the laws. The Sentate provided oversight...
The system worked.
Why don't ya grab these...
-spence
Threaded Mode