Bunker bill info

[RIROCKHOUND]

Animal I replied on the other site. I DID read the whole thing and responded multiple times to your responses. I told you i couldn't figure out how to post the whole article for everyone to read. I outlined it over there but it seems your goal has been to get me to say I am Anti-ban.

OK.
"Hi, my name is Bryan, and I am against the RISAA sponsored bill the proposes to ban the taking of Pogies in the bay using purse seines."

whew, feel better now.

[CaptDom]

Here you go Bryan. I too am against the RISAA sponsored bills.....The science in this 11 page document is pretty spot on.

The reduction boats got kicked outta jersey what, 4 years back?, and thats why the huge influx the past few years. The weiwantic was loaded with them last year, and the Merrimack saw a good push for the first time in many years, as they extend their range north, the numbers will continue to increase.......Besides which, the Freedom to Fish Act was a RISAA supported move if I'm not mistaken?

[CaptDom]

next 2

[CaptDom]

pages 5-6

[CaptDom]

next

[CaptDom]

9-10

[CaptDom]

last page

[animal]

Originally Posted by RIROCKHOUND

Animal I replied on the other site. I DID read the whole thing and responded multiple times to your responses. I told you i couldn't figure out how to post the whole article for everyone to read. I outlined it over there but it seems your goal has been to get me to say I am Anti-ban.

OK.
"Hi, my name is Bryan, and I am against the RISAA sponsored bill the proposes to ban the taking of Pogies in the bay using purse seines."

whew, feel better now.

Uh,actually Bryan.Takke a look at who posted these threads on both forums.You(on both sites)tried to post a single paragraph,and called it "the whole document".So seeing as how it's MY thread,you are posting MISLEADING info in,I see it as my RESPONSIBILITY,to correct you.Have a nice evening.

[JoeP]

Originally Posted by animal

Uh,actually Bryan.Takke a look at who posted these threads on both forums.You(on both sites)tried to post a single paragraph,and called it "the whole document".So seeing as how it's MY thread,you are posting MISLEADING info in,I see it as my RESPONSIBILITY,to correct you.Have a nice evening.

Animal-

You are dead-wrong and way out of line making statements such as "misleading" about Bryan's comments. Why don't you try to read everything and then comment so you don't sound so foolish.

One of the first comments Bryan made on the other site was:

"Lets make sure we read the whole report people."

That's been his take the entire time - READ the whole thing. The simple fact that he wasn't able to "technologically" attach the entire article means nothing. He was not trying to insinutate that the paragraph he posted was the entire article. Even a 3rd-grader could figure that out.

His comments are what counts. And I agree with his premise. I do think that some sort of limitation needs to be placed upon the taking of pogies, but it needs to be scientifically supported with ample evidence in order to be successful. RISAA apparently didn't do enough homework and may now have lost this battle even if its heart was in the right place.

So next time you want to cast aspersions at another member of this Board why don't you read his posts twice and make an educated comment.

And yeah - he's a friend of mine - but that did not change my opinion of your out-of-line comments.

Joe

[animal]

Originally Posted by JoeP

Animal-

You are dead-wrong and way out of line making statements such as "misleading" about Bryan's comments. Why don't you try to read everything and then comment so you don't sound so foolish.

One of the first comments Bryan made on the other site was:

"Lets make sure we read the whole report people."

That's been his take the entire time - READ the whole thing. The simple fact that he wasn't able to "technologically" attach the entire article means nothing. He was not trying to insinutate that the paragraph he posted was the entire article. Even a 3rd-grader could figure that out.

His comments are what counts. And I agree with his premise. I do think that some sort of limitation needs to be placed upon the taking of pogies, but it needs to be scientifically supported with ample evidence in order to be successful. RISAA apparently didn't do enough homework and may now have lost this battle even if its heart was in the right place.

So next time you want to cast aspersions at another member of this Board why don't you read his posts twice and make an educated comment.

And yeah - he's a friend of mine - but that did not change my opinion of your out-of-line comments.

Joe

Uhhh,ok.I have read "everything"twice.I'm the one who e-mailed the report to Bryan.This thread was posted to keep people in touch with what's going on,not for two or three guys(myself included)to have a pissing contest.Bryan's against the bill.Great.Big deal.I am not.I'm in contact with Rep Ray Gallison,and Jim Donofrio of the RFA.Ray has already sent his reply to Director Sullivan,in it is enclosed the section of our state constitution,which outlines the legislatures ABSOLUTE AUTHORITY over the goings on in our states fisheries management.We'll have to see how it turns out.I will continue to do my part for the bills passage.You can do as you wish.Anyhow,I will continue to count you among my friends.