The Fisherman Mag

[spence]

Wow, so I guess now like all my other spots are going to get burned as well?





Good luck.

-spence

[tlapinski]

Congrats and good luck Dave.

[JohnR]

Originally Posted by spence

Wow, so I guess now like all my other spots are going to get burned as well?





Good luck.

-spence

That's OK - I'll just leverage HIS spots

[Skitterpop]

And....

anyplace to suscribe online? bought a bunch here and there off and on over the years from the stands then found OTW and was temporarily smitten for 8 years.


Sounds good .

[Mr. Sandman]

Dave,

Congrats! on the new job. I bet the deadlines of a weekly make for some high pressure moments. Again, congrats and good luck with it. Been a subscriber for decades.

My only gripe is I would like some way to look up (or search for) past articles. But I realize how this is structured and it probably can't be done easily.

All the best.

[flatts1]

Congrats Dave!!

I haven't subscribed for a while myself, but that was because I could always check it out at the Barber shop or at a co-worker's office.

I didn't think it was bad in the past and I am curious to get folks' take on what was wrong with it in the past and why it is so much better now. I ask because the last issue I read was 3 weeks back.

Beyond the Editor's Log, are there different/new folks submitting different/new articles now? Are there less Ads now? Have new sections been added? What is different enough to make folks want to subscribe now as opposed to before?

Best,
Mike F.

[Bazza]

Congradulations Dave!! Good luck as the new editor.

[blue oyster]

congrats and good luck , please look into the delivery system like others have said sometimes it does not come for weeks or not at all , they have been great when you call and send them right back out but still a pain .

[NIB]

Originally Posted by flatts1

Congrats Dave!!

I haven't subscribed for a while myself, but that was because I could always check it out at the Barber shop or at a co-worker's office.

I didn't think it was bad in the past and I am curious to get folks' take on what was wrong with it in the past and why it is so much better now. I ask because the last issue I read was 3 weeks back.

Beyond the Editor's Log, are there different/new folks submitting different/new articles now? Are there less Ads now? Have new sections been added? What is different enough to make folks want to subscribe now as opposed to before?

Best,
Mike F.

I have to say every week there is a article that gets my interest..I like Zach he is a young guy with young person energy.It seems to rub off some. I deffintely notice the difference..Between NJ and NE..
Add to that there is a new bunch of writers submitting there thoughts.. More new blood.I do like Timmy Coleman an Charlie Soares also...
Other than that the layout appears to be the same..
The New Jersey edition seems to have quite a few of the same articles rehashed over and over.
I live in NJ.I don't really care if its a few days late the report section really means nothing to me.Just something to read at lunchtime.

It looks like they developed a new position for Zach Senior Field Editor..
Thats good I hope he sticks around..