Striper Talk Striped Bass Fishing, Surfcasting, Boating

     

Left Nav S-B Home FAQ Members List S-B on Facebook Arcade WEAX Tides Buoys Calendar Today's Posts Right Nav

Left Container Right Container
 

Go Back   Striper Talk Striped Bass Fishing, Surfcasting, Boating » Main Forum » StriperTalk!

StriperTalk! All things Striper

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-15-2008, 02:58 PM   #1
spence
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
spence's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: RI
Posts: 21,464
As long as the money goes towards conservation I couldn't really care less.

-spence
spence is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2008, 03:04 PM   #2
Nebe
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
Nebe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Libtardia
Posts: 21,694
Quote:
Originally Posted by spence View Post
As long as the money goes towards conservation I couldn't really care less.

-spence
same here.
Nebe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2008, 05:10 PM   #3
Mike P
Jiggin' Leper Lawyer
iTrader: (0)
 
Mike P's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: 61° 30′ 0″ N, 23° 46′ 0″ E
Posts: 8,158
Florida has had a SW license for close to 20 years, and it doesn't seem to hurt the tourist trade one single bit. Also, the federal registration isn't going to be necessary to fish--only to keep any bass or shad that you catch. They can't stop you from fishing for "bluefish" as long as you release any bass that you "accidently" catch

The simple fact of the matter is that in Florida and along the Gulf Coast, not only didn't a license stop people from fishing, but in every instance fishing got better after a license was instituted. The fisheries were managed better. It let the politicians know how many people fish. For many years in Florida, the commercial netters blocked attempts to institute an inshore net ban by backroom deals in Tallahassee. The Florida Sportsman took a look at how mnay licenses were issued, and figured that getting a net ban on the referendum ballot, as an amendment to the state constitution, was feasible. They did, and it passed with 72% of the votes.

Wise men speak because they have something to say; Fools, because they have to say something.
Mike P is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2008, 02:01 AM   #4
vanstaal
woody
iTrader: (0)
 
vanstaal's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Port St Lucie Fla.
Posts: 1,062
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Thursday June 12, 2008

MA Salt Water Fishing Registry (aka: License) Process to Begin

A statement from the Massachusetts Striped Bass Association

This morning, in newspapers across the state, it is being reported that
beginning in 2009, the federal government has announced a plan through
NOAA/Fisheries to institute a recreational angler registry in states
that do not have a salt water angler registration (read: license), and
this includes MA. This action is the result of a requirement in the
Magnuson-Stevens Reauthorization Act passed in congress last year and
has been anticipated for some time. This announcement will without a
doubt trigger the formal process of MA considering developing a salt
water fishing license.

There are many unanswered questions and issues involved in and related
to the upcoming process and MSBA has been preparing our involvement for
over a year. Over the past winter on behalf of the club I approached
both the head of the MA DMF Sport Fishing Program, Dr. Mike Armstrong
and MA DMF Director Paul Diodati and suggested that the DMF not wait to
be forced into this process by a federal proposal and be proactive and
convene a committee of recreational fishing representatives to explore
options for MA recreational anglers. I am happy to report that last
week, MSBA was invited to participate in just such a committee. MSBA
President Bill Prodouz has appointed MSBA Past President and Gov't
Affairs Officer Patrick Paquette to represent and also educate and
inform the MSBA membership throughout this process.

Historically, MSBA has been opposed to a Salt Water Fishing License
and that position will not change without a vote of the MSBA Membership.
Conversations with and between members both on and off the floor of MSBA
monthly meetings indicates the MSBA membership is open minded to some
sort of registry/license if it contained certain details that would
benefit our fishing community and would not result in just another tax.
Being affiliated nationally with the Recreational Fishing Alliance also
has enabled MSBA to learn about registry/license details that have and
have not worked in other states. In the coming months, MSBA will
communicate accurate information to our membership via our newsletter
and website www.msba.net and will undergo the process of making
decisions and taking positions. As always, MSBA is prepared for the
coming process and will help lead the MA recreational fishing community
through the upcoming process.

One note of caution: In the coming days and weeks there will be a great
deal of speculation, rumor, confusion and mis-information written in
newspapers and on the internet about the "pending" registry/license and
related processes. MSBA urges all MA recreational anglers to avoid
joining the inevitable emotional roller coaster and resist the urge to
react to every bit of information. Our state has a fifty plus year
history of organized recreational fishing organizations and the best way
to address the issues is through these organizations that have the
experience and relationships needed to navigate through the political
process we now face.

In addition to participating on the MA DMF committee mentioned above,
MSBA has already taken action to provide our membership with accurate
information. At the MSBA membership meeting on June 25th, in addition to
the monthly entertainment, this month supplied by Armand Tetreault of
Rhode Island Poppers, MSBA will shorten it's regular business meeting in
order to hear a 20 minute presentation, without debate, from the federal
agencies developing the angler registration program announced today.




__._,_.___

You can go anywhere you want if you look serious and carry a
Clipboard.
vanstaal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2008, 09:01 AM   #5
k-e-v-i-n
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
k-e-v-i-n's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 47
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nebe View Post
same here.
same with Nebe... if the money is for a good cause then I am all for it... I have always had to pay for freshwater all my life... however, remember MA and RI are one of FEW states that don't require a salt license... so we all know its bound to happen at some point...
k-e-v-i-n is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2008, 10:58 AM   #6
Swimmer
Retired Surfer
iTrader: (0)
 
Swimmer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Sunset Grill
Posts: 9,511
KarlF I didn't mean to introduce this as a new idea. Only to say that in the article that VanStal was kind enough to post in its entirety, it seems that the license is coming to fruition.

I know its like beating a dead horse with all the banter we have had around here about it. But this time it seems like its right around the corner.

Swimmer a.k.a. YO YO MA
Serial Mailbox Killer/Seal Fisherman
Swimmer is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:46 PM.


Powered by vBulletin. Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Please use all necessary and proper safety precautions. STAY SAFE Striper Talk Forums
Copyright 1998-20012 Striped-Bass.com