|
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
StriperTalk! All things Striper |
 |
11-04-2008, 01:42 PM
|
#1
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Hyde Park, MA
Posts: 4,152
|
(This is based on a spinning reel, not a bait casting reel)
With most spinning rod/reel matchups, the first guide should be as close to the size of the spool as possible. If the spool is bigger than the guide, when the speed of the line being pulled off the spool begins to slow down, the braid can/will have the tendency to loop over the first guide. This could be a cause. If the lure is heavy enough, it can cause the line to fly off of the reel in loops that are larger than the guide, causing friction/resistance, and may also be the cause of the line catching on a guide. (imaging spooling a spinning reel with 50-80lb. mono and casting a 3-5oz. jig. The line will come flying off the spool, and will eventually loop around the first guide.
One other problem would be having the braid loop over the bale while casting (I have 1st hand experience with this) and either snap your line or the bale, whichever is weakest.
I ALWAYS manually close the bale and apply tension to the line to prevent loose line from creating a potential "birdnest cast".
I hope this was helpful (to anyone).
|
|
|
|
11-04-2008, 01:50 PM
|
#2
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: cranston
Posts: 815
|
Sounds to me like you are getting wind knots. Try using fireline instead of powerpro.
|
|
|
|
11-04-2008, 02:49 PM
|
#3
|
Steve "Van Staal"
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Cranston
Posts: 544
|
Do yourself a favor, get rid of the Power pro!
|
|
|
|
11-04-2008, 03:16 PM
|
#4
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Newport, RI
Posts: 2,395
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by steve
Do yourself a favor, get rid of the Power pro!
|
I learned this lesson a while ago. Bad luck on the PP. made the switch to suffix. MMUUCCHH better.
P.S steve thanks for the HABS plug. Very nice. I appreciate it.
|
|
|
|
11-04-2008, 03:20 PM
|
#5
|
Respect your elvers
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: franklin ma
Posts: 3,368
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bassballer
I learned this lesson a while ago. Bad luck on the PP. made the switch to suffix. MMUUCCHH better.
P.S steve thanks for the HABS plug. Very nice. I appreciate it.
|
Surprised you guys don't like the PP. I've had great success with it. I also fish a sissy drag too, perhaps that accounts for the lack of breakoffs?
I put sufix on one of my spinners and it got AFU...go figure.
|
It's not the bait
At the end of your line
It's the fishing hole
Where all the fish is blind
|
|
|
11-04-2008, 03:44 PM
|
#6
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2004
Location: South of Boston
Posts: 2,605
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Back Beach
Surprised you guys don't like the PP. I've had great success with it. I also fish a sissy drag too, perhaps that accounts for the lack of breakoffs?
I put sufix on one of my spinners and it got AFU...go figure.
|
I have PP on all my spinning reels and love it, won't use anything else. I have Fireline on my conventionals because it is waaaaaaaaayyyy easier to pick out knots when the inevitable backlash occurs.
|
The charm of fishing is that it is the pursuit of what is elusive but attainable, a perpetual series of occasions for hope. ~John Buchan
|
|
|
11-04-2008, 03:57 PM
|
#7
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Newport, RI
Posts: 2,395
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Back Beach
Surprised you guys don't like the PP. I've had great success with it. I also fish a sissy drag too, perhaps that accounts for the lack of breakoffs?
I put sufix on one of my spinners and it got AFU...go figure.
|
Mike I used power pro for a bit with a cabo i was using then when I loaded it on my VS i was having issues with it. Switched to Suffix no more issues. It might be pure preference and just in my head though.
|
|
|
|
11-05-2008, 06:53 AM
|
#8
|
Respect your elvers
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: franklin ma
Posts: 3,368
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bassballer
It might be pure preference and just in my head though.
|
Same here. They're both very similar.
|
It's not the bait
At the end of your line
It's the fishing hole
Where all the fish is blind
|
|
|
11-06-2008, 12:37 PM
|
#9
|
Very Grumpy bay man
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 10,876
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by steve
Do yourself a favor, get rid of the Power pro!
|
AMEN!!!
Power Pro is nothing but problems. Spectron or FireLine for braid. Ande Back Country for mono.
Last edited by piemma; 11-06-2008 at 12:39 PM..
Reason: sp
|
No boat, back in the suds. 
|
|
|
11-04-2008, 03:45 PM
|
#10
|
Oblivious // Grunt, Grunt Master
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: over the hill
Posts: 6,682
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by FishermanTim
(This is based on a spinning reel, not a bait casting reel)
With most spinning rod/reel matchups, the first guide should be as close to the size of the spool as possible. If the spool is bigger than the guide, when the speed of the line being pulled off the spool begins to slow down, the braid can/will have the tendency to loop over the first guide. This could be a cause. If the lure is heavy enough, it can cause the line to fly off of the reel in loops that are larger than the guide, causing friction/resistance, and may also be the cause of the line catching on a guide. .
I hope this was helpful (to anyone).
|
Be careful here. What is happening to RIfoosball is that he is getting a guide loop 1/2 way out the rod, exactly because the first guide is too large. Guide systems need to handle braid differently than mono. Because of its memory and relative stiffness, mono needs to be gradually reduced as it travels out the rod, starting with a large first guide. Braid, however is too limp and prone to pile on itself as it meets each guide. High speed photos show loops of braid flopping ahead of the guide before they are pulled through. The goal with braid is to get it damped down and under control as quickly as possible. Hence new guide systems for rods dedicated to braid start with 1st guides about 1/2 the spool diameter, and quickly taper down to small guides (size 10 or smaller) out the rest of the rod. If you do not get braid under control quickly, as it meets a smaller guide (or even the tip top) out the rod, it overlaps the guide and breaks. That is the noise RIF is hearing, line ripping itself off the base of a guide. Switching to fireline helps because it is less limp, but the real answer is rewrapping the rod with smaller guides.
|
|
|
|
11-04-2008, 06:30 PM
|
#11
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Boston, PRofMA
Posts: 276
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by numbskull
rods dedicated to braid start with 1st guides about 1/2 the spool diameter, and quickly taper down to small guides (size 10 or smaller) out the rest of the rod.
|
Does that mean that if you fill a spin reel w/ braid, you can use it on a conventional rod if the 1st guide is half the spool diameter?
|
|
|
|
11-04-2008, 06:50 PM
|
#12
|
Oblivious // Grunt, Grunt Master
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: over the hill
Posts: 6,682
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by kenyee
Does that mean that if you fill a spin reel w/ braid, you can use it on a conventional rod if the 1st guide is half the spool diameter?
|
Sometimes. The longest casting guide setups are called Lowriders used on rods 11 feet and up, and the largest guide is often a 25mm, that typically is mounted more than 47" from the spool lip. These rods can be fished dual use (conventional or spinning). Most rods, however, use a shorter distance to the first guide, in which case elevation above the blank to prevent line slap becomes an issue. Also, the next two guides after the collector guide usually step down to smooth the transition to the first small guide on the rod (called the choke guide), so a spinner set up for braid is not the same as a standard conventional with a large first guide. In RIF's case, it is likely that the spool diameter is too small for the first guide, so the line sails through the first guide without being restricted, and collides with the second or third guide at high velocity and overwraps.
|
|
|
|
11-07-2008, 04:03 AM
|
#13
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Upper Bucks County PA
Posts: 234
|
Going smaller is the answer but it's not just the size of the guide, an even greater factor in eliminating guide wraps is distance of the first guide from the reel.
Moving the first guide out uses the effect of the payload straightening the line (and decreasing the contact angle of the line to the guide) to smooth line flow. Because the "coils" are smaller in diameter and longer in length the further from the reel, one can use smaller guides.
So, I am a big proponent of smaller guides on spinning rods using braid when matched with reels with the proper spool profile. Again it is best to be smaller rather than bigger; for top braid performance reels should have a small diameter (and in a perfect world, long and shallow). RIfoosball is in a better position to eliminate guide wraps with the use of the smaller diameter Penn 5500 then if he was using a big Greenie.
Casting performance is a fluid effect dependent on each component, reel, line, rod and guide design and layout and the interaction between them. If one wanted to build a drag racer it seems pointless to me to do the frame, transmission and engine work and then put a UPS box body on the chassis. Point being, blaming RI's problems on PowerPro is misapplying blame. Everything needs to work together and while a change to Fireline might lessen frequency the fundamental problem remains.
To the OP; if you would like to be even further confused there is another discussion of guide wraps on spinners and guide design and location over in the Rod Building Forum; check it out . . .
Last edited by ReelinRod; 11-07-2008 at 04:10 AM..
|
You can’t truly call yourself “peaceful” unless you are capable of great violence.
If you are incapable of violence, you are not peaceful, you are just harmless.
|
|
|
11-07-2008, 09:54 AM
|
#14
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: newport
Posts: 1,136
|
All good points above. I think a 5500 is a little small for a 9 ft rod.
|
|
|
|
11-07-2008, 09:59 AM
|
#15
|
Geezer Gone Wild
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 3,397
|
What Joe said...
An old 650SS or a 6500SS might be a better match - I use a 650SS on a 10' Lamiglas 120-1L for plugs and it works pretty well
|
"There is no royal road to this heavy surf-fishing. With all the appliances for comfort experience can suggest, there is a certain amount of hard work to be done and exposure to be bourne as a part of the price of success." From "Striped Bass," Scribner's Magazine, 1881.
|
|
|
11-07-2008, 07:18 PM
|
#16
|
Oblivious // Grunt, Grunt Master
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: over the hill
Posts: 6,682
|
Very well said, Reelin Rod. It seems that the reel manufacturers have quickly adapted to the need for new designs to get the most out of braided line, but the rod manufacturers (including most custom builders) are still putting out stuff that is at best a compromise to allow the use of both braid and mono....as well as accommodate many different sized reels. This results in a rod that is more tip heavy, less responsive, more problematic, and doesn't cast as far as one built solely to use braid. I expect that will soon change and companies like Shimano will introduce braid specific "Surf Systems". Seems like Lami has started in that direction with the SSU series, but even these rods have more and larger guides than necessary to still allow the use of mono without creating problems for braid.
|
|
|
|
11-07-2008, 07:34 PM
|
#17
|
I Had A BLAST!
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: I'm from Manhattan, Live in CT., but my heart is in SoCo!
Posts: 1,132
|
Sometimes braid will dig in. And when you let the line out, you feel it undigging itself. That's all. 
|
Be encouraging, not discouraging
<*((())))>< <*((())))><
|
|
|
 |
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:04 AM.
|
| |