|
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
StriperTalk! All things Striper |
 |
12-07-2008, 06:37 PM
|
#1
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: RI
Posts: 21,496
|
I think people who surfcast in a wetsuit are typically arrogant, selfish and otherwise rude people.
That being said, can anyone suggest a decent wetsuit that won't break the bank?
-spence
|
|
|
|
12-07-2008, 06:59 PM
|
#2
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: New Haven Ct
Posts: 957
|
just becuase you have on a wetsuit does not mean your swimming far out.Heck I know of spots like charles island in ct. and many other sand bars that people wade very far from shore in waders a wetsuit in on of those spots would be a better choice.
|
|
|
|
12-07-2008, 07:01 PM
|
#3
|
Frank Capone
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Hamden, Connecticut
Posts: 2,229
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by spence
I think people who surfcast in a wetsuit are typically arrogant, selfish and otherwise rude people.
That being said, can anyone suggest a decent wetsuit that won't break the bank?
|
Too funny.
Good point about Skiishing ( or I guess those who wear wetsuits and need to swim to point B ).
|
|
|
|
12-07-2008, 07:18 PM
|
#4
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,139
|
In the Montauk Locals Tournament, wetsuits have been put into a separate category from waders because wetsuiters are seen as having an advantage.
|
|
|
|
12-07-2008, 07:50 PM
|
#5
|
Frank Capone
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Hamden, Connecticut
Posts: 2,229
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by flyvice11787
In the Montauk Locals Tournament, wetsuits have been put into a separate category from waders because wetsuiters are seen as having an advantage.
|
...and that's the gist of this post. I'm just wondering if others see it that way
|
|
|
|
12-07-2008, 08:19 PM
|
#6
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,139
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by emgred
I put on a dry top and waders and I'm 60yds from shore on a bar in a back bay in chest deep water. Still surfcasting?
I'm 40 yds out on a rock, again dry top and waders, surfcasting?
I'm 40 yds out on the same rock in a wetsuit because it is more comfortable, surfcasting?
I don't use a wet suit when I fish, but do use waders and a dry top so I'm just posing questions.
If you don't have to swim to where you are going to fish, I think you can still call it surfcasting.
|
Emgred's answer hits it right on the head.
Quote:
Originally Posted by fcap60
For example, if I took a kayak or small boat 25-50-75 yards from shore in order to fish a couple of big rocks or island that I could not otherwise get to in my waders, I'm not sure if that is truly surfcasting. Afterall, in this example, the "surf" in "surfcasting" would be missing.
What are your thoughts ?
|
In your example, the boat/kayak would be considered transportation. Not much different than getting off a boat at Cuttyhunk or any other island not connected to the mainland or a spot that's unreachable by car or foot (getting around private property to a public spot). You would still end up surfcasting, right  ?
|
|
|
|
12-07-2008, 08:24 PM
|
#7
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 3,650
|
A distinct sub-culture, and a unofficial cadre of leadership, has already formed around it.
I think there will be a split, but it will be as a result of the sport taking on its own identity, rather than as a result of the traditional surfcasting community rejecting the wetsuiters. In other words, I don't see a surfcasting "purist" movement arising.
It will happen organically. Somebody will write a skishing book, a skishing-specific website will form, skishing tournaments will arise, etc.
Its a very effective method of fishing and the people participating are usually very good fishermen and they definitely have balls.
|
|
|
|
12-07-2008, 09:11 PM
|
#8
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,139
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe
A distinct sub-culture, and a unofficial cadre of leadership, has already formed around it.
I think there will be a split, but it will be as a result of the sport taking on its own identity, rather than as a result of the traditional surfcasting community rejecting the wetsuiters. In other words, I don't see a surfcasting "purist" movement arising.
It will happen organically. Somebody will write a skishing book, a skishing-specific website will form, skishing tournaments will arise, etc.
Its a very effective method of fishing and the people participating are usually very good fishermen and they definitely have balls.
|
Maybe Paul Melnyk will revive his site and organize some of his rants into a book after that  .
|
|
|
|
12-08-2008, 09:31 AM
|
#9
|
Curmudgeon
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Patchogue & NYC
Posts: 203
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by flyvice11787
Maybe Paul Melnyk will revive his site and organize some of his rants into a book after that  .
|
FYI
Melnyk just redid his sight.
http://www.surfcasting.com/
|
I'd rather be fishing!
|
|
|
 |
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:23 AM.
|
| |