Striper Talk Striped Bass Fishing, Surfcasting, Boating

     

Left Nav S-B Home FAQ Members List S-B on Facebook Arcade WEAX Tides Buoys Calendar Today's Posts Right Nav

Left Container Right Container
 

Go Back   Striper Talk Striped Bass Fishing, Surfcasting, Boating » Main Forum » StriperTalk!

StriperTalk! All things Striper

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-20-2009, 06:38 PM   #1
Sea Dangles
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
Sea Dangles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 8,718
This is an outstanding idea and will prove fruitful for fish and man alike.

PRO CHOICE REPUBLICAN
Sea Dangles is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2009, 09:32 AM   #2
MikeToole
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: N. H. Seacoast
Posts: 368
rec vs comm? not the issue.

I do not think this even compares with the issues of protecting fish to ensure we have enough. I can work around not having lead, but I can not work around no fish.

First off I do not agree with stopping the use of lead over 1 oz but this is no giant show stopper.

Yesterday I bought Sluggo weights and they were lead free weight with little difference in cost. All of the weights sold in NH under an oz are non-lead so availability has not been an issue. Other then Cod fishing I have not used lead sinkers over the past few years, use iron (up to 6 oz) at no cost. I do not see this increasing thecost of plugs that much, we're not going to be using gold. May be harder to put a bigger size weght in a plug in some cases but in most cases it can be done.

Jigs will be the real issue for the people who make their own. But there are other metals available that manufactures can use that won't increase the price that much, except for the people who need a couple of hundred a year.
MikeToole is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2009, 04:31 PM   #3
MakoMike
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
MakoMike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Newtown, CT
Posts: 5,659
Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeToole View Post
I do not think this even compares with the issues of protecting fish to ensure we have enough. I can work around not having lead, but I can not work around no fish.

First off I do not agree with stopping the use of lead over 1 oz but this is no giant show stopper.

Yesterday I bought Sluggo weights and they were lead free weight with little difference in cost. All of the weights sold in NH under an oz are non-lead so availability has not been an issue. Other then Cod fishing I have not used lead sinkers over the past few years, use iron (up to 6 oz) at no cost. I do not see this increasing thecost of plugs that much, we're not going to be using gold. May be harder to put a bigger size weght in a plug in some cases but in most cases it can be done.

Jigs will be the real issue for the people who make their own. But there are other metals available that manufactures can use that won't increase the price that much, except for the people who need a couple of hundred a year.
I'm guessing you don't bottom fish with sinkers from 2 to 20 ounces?

****MakoMike****

Http://www.Makomania.net

Official S-B Sponsor
MakoMike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2009, 05:13 PM   #4
freebie
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
freebie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Hull, MA
Posts: 512
at least it will help stop the netters, they use lead to get their nets down don't they? what will they use now?, I'm not giving up my lead and neither is anyone I know
freebie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2009, 07:29 PM   #5
MikeToole
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: N. H. Seacoast
Posts: 368
Quote:
Originally Posted by MakoMike View Post
I'm guessing you don't bottom fish with sinkers from 2 to 20 ounces?
You guess wrong. I still use lead for cod fishing but steel, up to 6 oz, from the beach and boat. I'm not supporting this rule change, just saying it is something I could live with and not as big a deal as the first poster made it out to be.
MikeToole is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2009, 02:38 PM   #6
cape2fish
Ahi
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Cape Cod
Posts: 13
Entrepreneurs

I think it is inevitable so we will need to adjust. Some folks will even profit from the change. Take a look at an alternative that was given out at last year's Vineyard Derby.

http://www.pallatrax.co.uk/Products/StonzeSystem.aspx

I haven't tried them yet but folks that make their own sinkers could switch to rocks and wouldn't have to worry about the toxic fumes of lead!
cape2fish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2009, 03:18 PM   #7
MikeToole
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: N. H. Seacoast
Posts: 368
Red face

Quote:
Originally Posted by cape2fish View Post
I think it is inevitable so we will need to adjust. Some folks will even profit from the change. Take a look at an alternative that was given out at last year's Vineyard Derby.
See, problem solved
MikeToole is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2009, 09:17 PM   #8
clambelly
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
clambelly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Cape Cod
Posts: 210
Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeToole View Post
I do not think this even compares with the issues of protecting fish to ensure we have enough. I can work around not having lead, but I can not work around no fish.

First off I do not agree with stopping the use of lead over 1 oz but this is no giant show stopper.

Yesterday I bought Sluggo weights and they were lead free weight with little difference in cost. All of the weights sold in NH under an oz are non-lead so availability has not been an issue. Other then Cod fishing I have not used lead sinkers over the past few years, use iron (up to 6 oz) at no cost. I do not see this increasing thecost of plugs that much, we're not going to be using gold. May be harder to put a bigger size weght in a plug in some cases but in most cases it can be done.

Jigs will be the real issue for the people who make their own. But there are other metals available that manufactures can use that won't increase the price that much, except for the people who need a couple of hundred a year.

i think the original posters intention in saying rec v. comm?not the issue, was that we have bigger things to worry about, like our own Gov't legislating us up the ass. comms and recs alike need to be very wary of any new legislation that comes down the pike, because it is likely to effect both sides in a negative way..

friggin liberals...
clambelly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2009, 10:25 AM   #9
maddmatt
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 352
Quote:
Originally Posted by clambelly View Post
i think the original posters intention in saying rec v. comm?not the issue, was that we have bigger things to worry about, like our own Gov't legislating us up the ass. comms and recs alike need to be very wary of any new legislation that comes down the pike, because it is likely to effect both sides in a negative way..

friggin liberals...
exactly clam belly

while we're argueing they're banning our right to be out there




"never met a bluefish i wouldn't sell"
maddmatt is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:56 AM.


Powered by vBulletin. Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Please use all necessary and proper safety precautions. STAY SAFE Striper Talk Forums
Copyright 1998-20012 Striped-Bass.com