Striper Talk Striped Bass Fishing, Surfcasting, Boating

     

Left Nav S-B Home FAQ Members List S-B on Facebook Arcade WEAX Tides Buoys Calendar Today's Posts Right Nav

Left Container Right Container
 

Go Back   Striper Talk Striped Bass Fishing, Surfcasting, Boating » Striper Chat - Discuss stuff other than fishing ~ The Scuppers and Political talk » Political Threads

Political Threads This section is for Political Threads - Enter at your own risk. If you say you don't want to see what someone posts - don't read it :hihi:

 
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 09-06-2009, 10:36 PM   #1
Cool Beans
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
Cool Beans's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,044
Quote:
Originally Posted by stripersnipr View Post
I think we've got a couple of posters here that are fully qualified to step into Jones' shoes.
So are we nominating Spence to the position?
Cool Beans is offline  
Old 09-07-2009, 06:42 AM   #2
spence
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
spence's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: RI
Posts: 21,483
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cool Beans View Post
So are we nominating Spence to the position?
Unfortunately, Jones was extremely well qualified for the position of Green Jobs Czar. I'm not...

-spence
spence is offline  
Old 09-07-2009, 10:20 AM   #3
justplugit
Registered Grandpa
iTrader: (0)
 
justplugit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: east coast
Posts: 8,592
This Czar stuff is a bunch of baloney.

Just a way of Obama creating job titles to employ his friends, imho.

Another example of, "you can tell a man's character by the friends he keeps. "

" Choose Life "
justplugit is offline  
Old 09-07-2009, 01:55 PM   #4
Cool Beans
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
Cool Beans's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,044
Quote:
Originally Posted by spence View Post
Unfortunately, Jones was extremely well qualified for the position of Green Jobs Czar. I'm not...

-spence
Are you serious? Just cause hes a huge protester and communist, doensnt make him qualified. You are much more qualified that Jones....You are not a communist and you're my favorite tree hugging left wing nut out there...

I vote for Spence!!
Cool Beans is offline  
Old 09-08-2009, 09:22 AM   #5
justplugit
Registered Grandpa
iTrader: (0)
 
justplugit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: east coast
Posts: 8,592
It's been reported that he never filled out the vetting paper work.
Who ever got a job without filling out the application?

" Choose Life "
justplugit is offline  
Old 09-08-2009, 10:16 AM   #6
spence
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
spence's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: RI
Posts: 21,483
Quote:
Originally Posted by justplugit View Post
It's been reported that he never filled out the vetting paper work.
Who ever got a job without filling out the application?
From what I heard the paperwork is more for appointees who require confirmation. The czar positions are a little more relaxed.

-spence
spence is offline  
Old 09-08-2009, 02:52 PM   #7
justplugit
Registered Grandpa
iTrader: (0)
 
justplugit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: east coast
Posts: 8,592
Quote:
Originally Posted by spence View Post
The czar positions are a little more relaxed.

-spence
Ya, i agree Spence, they couldn't get much more relaxed then that.

Last edited by justplugit; 09-08-2009 at 03:06 PM.. Reason: wrong icons

" Choose Life "
justplugit is offline  
Old 09-09-2009, 08:46 AM   #8
fishbones
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
fishbones's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Easton, MA
Posts: 5,737
Quote:
Originally Posted by spence View Post
From what I heard the paperwork is more for appointees who require confirmation. The czar positions are a little more relaxed.

-spence
That's exactly why Obama has so many Czars. They don't have to be approved or confirmed like cabinet members. I'm sure if you looked into the backgrounds of a lot of his Czar cronies, you'd find things that would prevent them from being confirmed by even liberal members of the Senate.

Conservatism is not about leaving people behind. Conservatism is about empowering people to catch up, to give them tools at their disposal that make it possible for them to access all the hope, all the promise, all the opportunity that America offers. - Marco Rubio
fishbones is offline  
Old 09-09-2009, 10:28 AM   #9
JohnnyD
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
JohnnyD's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Mansfield, MA
Posts: 5,238
Quote:
Originally Posted by fishbones View Post
That's exactly why Obama has so many Czars. They don't have to be approved or confirmed like cabinet members. I'm sure if you looked into the backgrounds of a lot of his Czar cronies, you'd find things that would prevent them from being confirmed by even liberal members of the Senate.
Eh. Bush had over 30 different czars during his time in office, none of which were official vetted.

This isn't a brand new thing in the executive branch. This czar business developed during the early years of the Bush administration. The Republican Congress changed the regulations for presidential advisers, giving person advisers to the president "executive privilege" (Cheney's favorite buzz-phrase) and not being required to have background checks or be approved.

Entertainingly, Glenn Beck (who's started a lot of the yelling about czars) states that George Bush had 4 czars and Obama has "16 and counting." "Fair and Balanced" my ass.

A bigger concern for me is Obama appointing a former UAW member as Manufacturing Czar. I believe the UAW to be a figurative bucket of concrete in which the automotive companies feet were cemented into before they went overboard.
JohnnyD is offline  
 

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:28 PM.


Powered by vBulletin. Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Please use all necessary and proper safety precautions. STAY SAFE Striper Talk Forums
Copyright 1998-20012 Striped-Bass.com