|
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Political Threads This section is for Political Threads - Enter at your own risk. If you say you don't want to see what someone posts - don't read it :hihi: |
09-21-2009, 05:27 PM
|
#1
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 3,650
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by detbuch
Although there have been periodic Republican burps to the right, especially in rhetoric, in practice, due to election necessities, the Republicans have been drifting to the left for a few decades. Before Bush II, I thought that the Republican party was similar to the Democratic party under JFK. And the Democrats have moved, progressively, to the left of that position. Bush II may well have moved to the left of Kennedy. And the Democrats may be well on the way to picking up the broken pieces of European, British, and Canadian quasi-socialism and expanding it to further depths. For a statistical, analytical, too hard to read work on what I consider the moving "center," see MacKuen & Parker-Stephen, The Left Shift in American Politics. ABSTRACT: "Here we examine the "Left Shift" in American politics. The Left Shift refers to the fact that policy position attributions of left groups--we examine the Democratic Party case--are consistently further left-of-center than group members own preferences, but that this same mismatch does not apply to attributions of the political right. We show how partisan asymmetries in affect, which are steeped in personality differences, combine with the ideological tenor of media messages to produce pervasive asymmetric attribution bias in American politics--that is, Left Shift."
|
Eeek - what a confusing paste job.
I know what the words "pervasive asymmetric attribution bias" mean individually, but collectively, I'm kind of expecting you to want check my prostate.
|
|
|
|
09-21-2009, 07:02 PM
|
#2
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 7,725
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe
Eeek - what a confusing paste job.
I know what the words "pervasive asymmetric attribution bias" mean individually, but collectively, I'm kind of expecting you to want check my prostate.
|
Yes, it is, as I said, too hard to read. I see, however, that you didn't respond to my plain English opinion that preceded the "confusing paste job." Contrary to your assertion that Republicans have been refusing to step to the center, they have not only stepped to it, but passed over to the left side of it, so that the "center" has shifted, and continues to shift leftward. Which presents a problem in determining "balance" if everytime you "bend" or "moderate" the center moves. What's the point of being "Republican" if it only means you've become what the "Dems" used to be? If the shift is constantly in that direction, the Dems clearly deserve the title "progressive" and the Repubs are merely come-lately imitators. If Repubs are not going to be opposing enough to create a stable center between the two parties, why exist?
Last edited by detbuch; 09-21-2009 at 08:52 PM..
Reason: spelling
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:45 AM.
|
| |