a poem for Al Gore

[scottw]

Originally Posted by spence

Perhaps you just spelled it wrong...

http://www.striped-bass.com/Stripert...-pagliuca.html

-spence

nope, spelled it twice as intended this morning....#^&#^&#^&#^&#^&#^&#^& referred to the voters of Mass. who display diminished mental capacity, brought on by the spread of liberalism and evidenced in their continuing to vote for the most loathsome people on the planet to represent them....

libterd, which you improperly referred to refers to a liberal who demeans and impunes the intelligence and motivations of those who disagree with them and attack the knowledege and comprehension of others while displaying little of their own...

both are scientific terms and neither is directed toward "developmentally disabled kids and adults", but don't let that stop you from making the inference, hope you were equally offended by Obama's callous Special Olympic's reference...

I asked your wife...she told me that she's married to a terd...

I know the difference between an a and an e...you appear to be struggling

you should refrain from quoting someone, then changing the spelling of one of their words, then taking them them to task for your new spelling...it's very dishonest...it's like manipulating climate data...

[spence]

Originally Posted by scottw

#^&#^&#^&#^&#^&#^&#^& referred to the voters of Mass. who display diminished mental capacity, brought on by the spread of liberalism and evidenced in their continuing to vote for the most loathsome people on the planet to represent them....

libterd, which you improperly referred to refers to a liberal who demeans and impunes the intelligence and motivations of those who disagree with them and attack the knowledege and comprehension of others while displaying little of their own...

By using "tard" you are in fact behaving as a "terd".

This is of course using your own definitions.

Sounds pretty hypocritical and inconsistent, which fits JD's analysis of your opinions on climate change.

-spence

[scottw]

Originally Posted by spence

By using "tard" you are in fact behaving as a "terd".

This is of course using your own definitions.

Sounds pretty hypocritical and inconsistent, which fits JD's analysis of your opinions on climate change.

-spence

I would never claim to be above some hypocricy or inconsistency as I would never assume to be smarter than the next guy ...that's for the terd's although I'm happy to poke fun at the guy who claims to be both...

My reference to the Mass. voters (and I should include RI for sending and/or returning the the likes of Patrick Kennedy and Sheldon Whitehouse) was based on the result of their voting record and the demonstrably despicable people that they put into office, I even offered them the liberals favorite excuse for bad behaviour which was the ability to claim victimhood from some invented disease....

a terd would have dismissed them as ignorant and uneducated and possibly suggested that they not be allowed to vote until they passed a competency test.....sound familiar? the terd goes far beyond poking fun, the terd need to completely discredit you and generally not based on your arguments but by cornering you as a racist, bigot, denier, truther, etc........or worst of all ..a conservative...

I don't claim to have all of the answers regarding climate change/global warming...I do have a lot of questions and a healthy skepticism for the arrogant pukes who have decided that there is no debate and it's their way or the highway...

this has become familiar and is repeated here, in Washington and with the Climate questions....one side has decided that it's their way and there will be no debate, the terd bristles when his world view is challenged and to do so illicits some very vicious attacks, the libterds currently operate as thugs...they have to operate this way because it's the most efficient way to carry the constant promotion of their propoganda and lies, manitaining lies is hard work, time is showing their world view to be quite faulty but they are in so deep that they can only ratchet up the rhetoric.....it will be interesting to see how it plays out....not going so well in Copenhagen or Washington at the moment despite the "we are right and everyone else is lying" approach....

JD's analysis....that's funny...lot's of assumptions there as well...but maybe I just don't understand

[scottw]

On Tuesday, the Moscow-based Institute of Economic Analysis (IEA) issued a report claiming that the Hadley Center for Climate Change based at the headquarters of the British Meteorological Office in Exeter (Devon, England) had probably tampered with Russian-climate data.

The IEA believes that Russian meteorological-station data did not substantiate the anthropogenic global-warming theory. Analysts say Russian meteorological stations cover most of the country's territory, and that the Hadley Center had used data submitted by only 25% of such stations in its reports. Over 40% of Russian territory was not included in global-temperature calculations for some other reasons, rather than the lack of meteorological stations and observations.

The data of stations located in areas not listed in the Hadley Climate Research Unit Temperature UK (HadCRUT) survey often does not show any substantial warming in the late 20th century and the early 21st century.

The HadCRUT database includes specific stations providing incomplete data and highlighting the global-warming process, rather than stations facilitating uninterrupted observations.