Location: I live in the Villiage of Hyannis in the Town of Barnstable in the Commonwealth of MA
Posts: 2,795
Ronnie,
I agree the us trade rules make no sense but that has NOTHING to do with the claim this plant is closing because of reduced herring regulations.
The herring (sardines are atlantic herring) regs wer cut back because the quota has not been filled (read...overfishing) and there is no getting around that.
The MWT fleet has recently supplied that plant and its a fact.
As far as being a zealot...you bet your ass...the america industrial herring fleet has damaged all of our fishing communities. They are screwing up our forage/bait and in few years when the science shows how this lack of herring is part of the reason less stripers are migrating to Maine you might start paying attention.
FYI...I work with reps from the small local fishing fleet in Port Clyde and others from all over Maine. We would all love to see some Maine recs come to any one of the many herring hearings in Portland.
"It is impossible to complain and to achieve at the same time"--Basic Patrick (on a good day)
Well Pat the sad part is that the foreign fleets are still there catching those same fish we try to protect and our poleticians give them the green light to do so while our boats have quotas and limited seasons. It's like me releasing fish up here so the comercials down there can catch them. So far I have 8 American Litoral tags from nice fish I landed and tagged returned by part time comercials. So much for my catch n release.
We need to deal with the whole problem not just our fishermen. The international boats do way more damage than ours cause they have no rules and all the exceptions like the 7 meter rule that alows small boats to catch all they want. They then go back to their 1000 ft plus mother ship to unload. Like those damn Russian factory ships that were off the coast of Maine in the 80's.The problem is that we tell our fishermen to go by the rules but oooppps we do nothing about their competition.Yup we need strong rules and enforcement but those fish don't just swim in our coastal waters.The enforcement can't just be on our fishermen, it has to be on all.
As far as making meetings well it would be a nice thing but having to work makes it very hard especially when they keep screwin with our pay to give more to those that don't won't work.Many of us can only do them up here where they;re held at night so workin people can make them. The poleticians had to be reminded up here they work for us not the other way around.
I agree it's good to be zealous about these things but we need to deal with the whole problem otherwise it gets like the striped bass. Complain about the comercial rod n reelers then the next day go to New Jearsy or Verginia and go out on a charter boat and catch striped bass in the EEZ an lie about it.Make nice pics till they tell you that you need to throw them overboard cause that speed boat comin your way is the marine police. The whole pic needs to be fixed including these back room treaties the take away from our fishermen no mater who they are for the foreign fishing fleets.
As far as the plant goes well it's done so more jobs are too. Still won't stop the importing of herring caight by foreign comercial boats within eye sight of our own fisherman.
But keep fighting we all do our part hopefully something changes for the good soon or it will all be moot.
Location: I live in the Villiage of Hyannis in the Town of Barnstable in the Commonwealth of MA
Posts: 2,795
basenjib....The sardine cannery is not in any way part the problem...that cannery is important and it is just the latest victim of the american industrial commercial fleet. The boogie many...sheeet...IF you would like tog et into a numbers debate I say you shoot first...I got my arguements complete.
Ronnie...FYI...The Canadians and actually most of the countries in the world have banned MWT and Pair Trawling...there are no "mother ships off our east coast in any way shape or form.
Your arguement is exactly correct if we were talking about Tuna and some other species but truth is Atlantic Herring, Cod and some other species getting less press have been screwed up by Americans and our system alone...at least those screwed up since the early 80s and that is most that are in trouble today. Hell, the Canadians think we are crazy and are causing all kinds of issues because they will not water down or change their science the way we do.
I feel your pain on having to work at times of most hearings. Just let me ask a follow up. IF you can't attend the hearings/meetings and it takes much longer to find and read the information then where is your information on the atlantic herring industry of today coming from. Pretty much every small boat commercial and rec and enviro group is on the same page...the numbers show all kinds of numbers of many many species in the by catch reports and many species turned downward hard aftr the MWT fleet arrived again in 1999. Their bycatch is ugly and does not descriminate.
I also agree there is more to the Maine striper thing as well but if you think that the shortage of herring off the inshore Maine coast is not a part of it you are in denial.
"It is impossible to complain and to achieve at the same time"--Basic Patrick (on a good day)
My son, who is now 17, has been sitting down with me and polishing off a can of sardines on crackers since he was 5. We like em with a dash of tabasco. Preferably Ritz crackers. I started eating them with my Dad when i was about 5. High protien, good fish oil, delicious.
Location: I live in the Villiage of Hyannis in the Town of Barnstable in the Commonwealth of MA
Posts: 2,795
SEAFOOD.COM NEWS [Letters] - April 16, 2010 - ''After 135 years, last US sardine cannery shutting down in Maine, Bumble Bee says quota cuts to blame.''
This story does not get to the root of the problems here. The truth is
the industrial herring fishery has not even caught close to its annual
target quota (e.g. 180,000 metric tons in 2004) for the last several
years. This indicates a problem with herring abundance, not with catch
limits. In fact, the 2010 catch limit was based on the average fleet
landings for the last three years. It is these vessels' exceptional
efficiency that has contributed to shrinking herring populations over
the past decade (a 24 percent decline since 2000).
Furthermore, poor monitoring of this fishery means scientific advisors
don't know exactly what is going on, which leads to a great deal of
uncertainty. Therefore, declining stocks plus uncertainty equals harvest
reductions. It's too bad that Bumble Bee has been fingering fisheries
managers for their problems, when the real culprits are their suppliers:
industrial trawlers. More importantly, it is terrible that so many jobs
will be lost in an area with little opportunity. With luck this factory
can be used for something else and bring jobs back to Maine.
Gary Libby
Lobster and groundfish fisherman
Captain of F/V MisKim and F/V Leslie and Jessica
Port Clyde, Maine
"It is impossible to complain and to achieve at the same time"--Basic Patrick (on a good day)
I was not looking for a fight. I was just upset and felt sorry for the guy that I spoke with about the Plant closing. I can see that you know more about this stuff than I ever will. I am sure you have sympathy for the people that lost jobs too. Thanks for the information...it really cleared things up for me. Sorry if I came acrossed like an ass, Joe.
Location: I live in the Villiage of Hyannis in the Town of Barnstable in the Commonwealth of MA
Posts: 2,795
Joe...my passion is driven by the fact that fishermen and others in traditional new england employment are victims (the people in the plant are amongst those). It is insanity to let these industrial operations gut our traditional ways and then blame everyone but themselves and their greedy operations. This fleet has done the same damage in every ocean it has been allowed to fish.
I applaud you for having the free mind to get into the conversation as that is how we will all learn and eventually change the non sustainable methods of the last 15 years or so.
FYI...Ronnie and I have been friends or years and he is someon I hae much respect for as he is what I call a local hero. He serves the local community in all he does and on this issue he is just confusing a couple fisheries issues. One of the many things he and I agree on is that our government has failed our fisheries and we have so very many issues all colliding and that makes for a confusing mess. I only have more knowledge on a few of these issues because it is part of what I get to do for a living and I am grateful to do what I love.
no biggie on my end...we debate and discuss and arrive at intelligent solutions...or we loose...i'd rather have the debate to win
Last edited by BasicPatrick; 04-19-2010 at 09:01 PM..
"It is impossible to complain and to achieve at the same time"--Basic Patrick (on a good day)
I am not one for engaging in these online discussions, but Basicpatrick has gone too far and it is insulting to Maine fishermen and especially to those in Prospect Harbor who have just lost their jobs - some of whom I have known for 25+ years. Basicpatrick and his like are just trying to displace the blame from their role in this plant closing. Their relentless attacks on the herring fishery - not supported by facts - have more to do with this plant closing than any science or facts about the fishery.
The inshore quota was not reduced because the fishery has not caught the total quota for the fishery - this is just total nonsense! Having attended all public meetings relative to this issue, this was never mentioned as a rational by anyone. Again, this is fabricated by those who attempt to displace their guilt onto others. The total quota was reduced becuase of scientific uncertainty and the inshore quota that Stinson's relied heavily on was drastically reduced because of a political campaign that Basicpatirck has been participating in for a number of years - along with Earth Justice, CHOIR and Pew - all friends of fishermen everywhere!
In fact, the resource is not overfished and overfishing is not occurring. While a number of issues did arise from the most recent stock assessment, it was a consensus of the participating scientists that the stock appears to be stable and that current removals from the fishery have maintained a relatively abundant stock size.
Basicpatrick is right - he is zealot and totally lacking in factual information. Bycatch in this fishery is not ugly - in fact information for the fishery indicates it is one of the cleanest in the region. People like Patrick just say "well we don't believe it." To say most countries ban midwater trawling is not correct. In fact, the largest fishery in the US ( BSAI pollock) is MSC certified as sustainable and prosecuted with midwater trawls. As for the GL letter he posted - I know Gary and do not believe he wrote it. I do beleive he signed it, but most likely written by Earth Justice.
As I said, I have never participated in these online forums but this spin goes way too far. The reality is people like Patrick felt way too comfortable going after the big bad boats and can't own up to their own part in the outcome of this plant closing. and blaming Maine herring fishermen to boot. Take a look in the mirror Patrick and then take a look at the people you hang out with. Every night before you go to bed think about the 140 people in Prospect who lost their jobs!
You state, as fact, that the quota is the reason the factory had to close, and that the quota is putting fishermen out of business.
Someone please correct me if I'm wrong but, the quota set in 2004 was 180,000 metric tons and has now been decreased to 91,000 metric tons.
According to statistics *From the State of Maine*:
Year Metric Tons Landed
2006 43367
2007 32935
2008 30048 http://www.maine.gov/dmr/commercialf...erring.tbl.pdf
So, explain to me where the issue is?
Also, bottom and midwater trawlers are a disgusting practice that should be completely banned. You want to complain about a group that has cost fishermen jobs - in addition to lowering the price of fish and wreaking havoc on the ecosystem all without regard for the fish and only for their wallet, you can start there.
Bycatch in this fishery is not ugly - in fact information for the fishery indicates it is one of the cleanest in the region.
Information from the fishery??? If it's so clean, why have you guys been fighting like hell for years to keep the observers off the boats? Or that nifty little trick you boys like - when there's an observer on one boat, you guys just pair trawl and then the other boat hauls back every time? Oh wait, it's for safety sake that you can just dump your cod end without taking it aboard when its loaded to the gills with haddock. That's right - it's bycatch if it hits the deck, but if you just dump a few metric tons of dead groundfish, its not "by-catch"
And the crowning glory - when there's 6 miles of DEAD FLOATING STRIPERS in the Great South Channel when you boys are busy destroying the fall tuna fishery - that's not discard, b/c you didn't out them on your boat.
And as for the plant closing, while I feel for the men that lost their jobs, - stop exporting the herring on that big freaking freighter that loads at norpel in NB and keep some product for the domestic cannery market. Its not the regs that closed you down - you got a better price overseas and F'd your workers.
Location: I live in the Villiage of Hyannis in the Town of Barnstable in the Commonwealth of MA
Posts: 2,795
Well...it didnt take the well funded mwt fleet long to find this thread.
I wonder what meherring gets paid to hop on the internet...Welcome
I wonder if meherring is the lobbiest that is always talking about how to fix river herring we need to increase the striped bass quota
OR is he the dc laywer that is bold enough to admit he is trying to get loopholes in the management plan
OR maybe he is the plant manager who after giving the speach about being an industry "on our knees" gets in his 50K 2009 Toyota Sequoia
OR the employee that likes to yell at people and try an intimidate them outside the hotels
Let's see what's will you say next...oh...I know...
The crime here is that your greedy industry is using the tragedy of this plant to push your agenda. Why is your press agent not pushing the positive effort to flip the plant into somehting more reliable
All you want the press to cover is the quota reduction...
The only guilt I feel is that I walked away for a while after we formed CHOIR and we failed at preventing your damage from going as far as it has and for that I feel guily
Hop on one of your vessels and sail off to your next MSC certified fishery that you are going to ruin. Go kill a whale or dump a bag of the wrong size herring or river herring or haddock over the side since that is what you truely do best.
Last edited by BasicPatrick; 04-20-2010 at 03:03 AM..
"It is impossible to complain and to achieve at the same time"--Basic Patrick (on a good day)
Maine sardines taste a lot better than the imports. Grew up on them an still love em. Shame the poleticians don't make free traders go by the agreement to improve standards in free trade countries. Drove our sardine industry out of the market as they couldn't compete with giant netters that didn't have to go by American fishery rules.MMMMMM No limits,no health care,no vacations,no OSHA,very little pay,no workers comp,no sick time an on an on. I wonder when they're gonna start worrying about our economy instead of everyone elses on the planet.Who gives a damn if theirs no work in China. The schmucks don't import hardly anything from here no how. Sorry but it's a sore point as every day another freind tells me they got laid off as their job has gone over seas. Ron
Our poleticians spend more time making rules that put our businesses out of business than they do trying to make things better and create more jobs. All for the benefit of foreign jobs to build economies elsewhere. I wonder how much they get paid to keep working for these foreign governments cause they sure as hell aren't doing a damn thing for our country anymore.Time to vote the whole bunch out of office and start from scratch.we need people working for us and not lining their own pockets at our countries expense.
Just coming up from the basement, sharpening the tines on the pitchfork.
Enjoy your Birkenstocks while you can my Liberal comrades.
The next Revolution draws nigh.
Information from the fishery??? If it's so clean, why have you guys been fighting like hell for years to keep the observers off the boats? Or that nifty little trick you boys like - when there's an observer on one boat, you guys just pair trawl and then the other boat hauls back every time? Oh wait, it's for safety sake that you can just dump your cod end without taking it aboard when its loaded to the gills with haddock. That's right - it's bycatch if it hits the deck, but if you just dump a few metric tons of dead groundfish, its not "by-catch"
And the crowning glory - when there's 6 miles of DEAD FLOATING STRIPERS in the Great South Channel when you boys are busy destroying the fall tuna fishery - that's not discard, b/c you didn't out them on your boat.
And as for the plant closing, while I feel for the men that lost their jobs, - stop exporting the herring on that big freaking freighter that loads at norpel in NB and keep some product for the domestic cannery market. Its not the regs that closed you down - you got a better price overseas and F'd your workers.
Just use the little "+" button next to the quote button. you select all the posts you want to quote then hit the Quote button on the last one. that way it puts them all in the same post like I just did with both of yours.
Quote:
Originally Posted by maddmatt
just trying to get my number of posts to 10,000 so i can be somebody
Then you can comment on each one......and you got a loooooong way to go to catch Bigfish in the Post count
"If you're arguing with an idiot, make sure he isn't doing the same thing."
You all are missing the point, the plant closing is not related to midwater trawling. Bumble Bee clearly stated that they will close because the reduced quota in the inshore GOM is not sufficient for them to be viable. While the State of Maine numbers appear to be correct, the federal area quotas are the ones to look at.
These fish have been supplied to the plant during the summer/fall season by purse seiners. The quota was drastically cut even though the science says the stock is stable, because of campaigns by the Pew, etc people.
The Norpel plant has nothing to do with this, nor does their fish caught in the winter and shipped oversees. It has to do with available quota in the GOM.
As for all the accusations about midwater trawling, there is no factual information to support the allegations. The fishery has bycatch, but when compared to others in the region it is a clean fishery. There is no factual information to support the striper bycatch in the Channel. In fact, the MA DMF investigated through VMS and found there where no herring boats in the area, but lets not let the facts get in the way.
All the sensational rhetoric "greedy, etc" does not overcome the facts.
The bottom line here is the plant has closed, 140 people have lost there jobs, and these campaigns attacking the fishery have devasted the Maine herring fishery. And as I said before, Patrick, you and your like, should look in the mirror. While the entire outcome can't be laid at anyones feet, you have had a hand in it.
I come from a Maine fishing family, I am not a lawyer, lobbiest or plant manager and don't have a press agent. I also don't plan on spending time arguing here with people who rely on internet forums for their information. Try reading something factual for a change at nefmc.org
You all are missing the point, the plant closing is not related to midwater trawling. Bumble Bee clearly stated that they will close because the reduced quota in the inshore GOM is not sufficient for them to be viable. While the State of Maine numbers appear to be correct, the federal area quotas are the ones to look at.
No, *you're* missing the point and then spinning your position as it's proven wrong and scientifically inaccurate.
If the Maine numbers appear correct, and the federal area quotas are the ones to look at, then why does your post and all the sob stories harp on Maine "decreasing the quota in half"?
Quote:
As for all the accusations about midwater trawling, there is no factual information to support the allegations. The fishery has bycatch, but when compared to others in the region it is a clean fishery. There is no factual information to support the striper bycatch in the Channel. In fact, the MA DMF investigated through VMS and found there where no herring boats in the area, but lets not let the facts get in the way.
Must've been an unreported oil spill or other disaster that caused miles of belly up stripers. Exactly what other fishery are you referring to that midwater trawling is "a clean fishery" relative to?
It has been working great for me. I did not realize that during "Mission Accomplished" jobs previously sent offshore came back to the US. Please enlighten us.
Production at Maine canneries has been sliding since peaking at 384 million cans in 1950. Faced with declining demand and a changing business climate, the plants went by the wayside one by one until, five years ago, the Stinson plant was the last one standing.
Quit being a tool and trying to politicize a dying business.
The total quota was reduced becuase of scientific uncertainty and the inshore quota that Stinson's relied heavily on was drastically reduced because of a political campaign that Basicpatirck has been participating in for a number of years - along with Earth Justice, CHOIR and Pew - all friends of fishermen everywhere!
I always find it amusing when the midwater lobby tries to paint those of us interested in seeing our forage fisheries managed sustainably as some of out of touch environmentalists.
Quote:
Originally Posted by meherring
...it is insulting to Maine fishermen"
You're kidding right?
The Maine fishermen have been some of the strongest folks leading the charge to bring some sanity to the sea herring fishery since the Midwater boats came.
Are you sure that you have attended all meetings on this issue as you mentioned, MEherring? When did you start? You know it doesn't help to attend these meetings if you don't pay attention.
Poor chum. Here, let me help you. Take a listen to the following audio clip from a September 2006 NEFMC meeting. It is only 5 minutes. Pay attention, now, and realize just how out of touch you really are.
MEherring in case you missed it Steve Weiner, the chairman of Choir, is the commercial tuna fisherman who spoke in that above audio clip. He is a Maine fisherman. Also note that the Maine Lobstermen's Association supported CHOIR's positions as well. Might I suggest you try expanding your circle of friends in the Maine fishing community.
I could introduce you to some at the next NEFMC meeting if you like.
Hope this helps.
Mike Flaherty
Wareham, MA
Last edited by flatts1; 04-21-2010 at 09:30 PM..
"Successful management of striped bass,
and all fish for that matter, is 90 percent
commonsense guesswork."
-- Ted Williams
And as I said before, Patrick, you and your like, should look in the mirror.
You're funny, MEherring.
Quote:
Lessons Learned From Herring Amendment 1
By Mike Flaherty
Commercial Fisheries News
February 2006
As someone who has been deeply interested and involved in the New England Fishery Management Council’s management of Atlantic herring, I appreciate the depth of coverage, analysis, and opinions that Commercial Fisheries News has devoted to this issue.
While I’m not a commercial fisherman or a processor or a paid lobbyist, at this time I would like to share with you some of my thoughts and observations as someone who has learned a lot during the Amendment 1 process. My hope is that folks will take some lessons learned here and apply them toward future management measures by working together not only on sea herring, but other species as well.
Here are the words New England council Chairman Frank Blount used at the Council’s November 2005 meeting in Hyannis, MA to describe his frustration at council members who could not agree on what to do with Amendment 1 to the Atlantic Herring Fishery Management Plan.
“I think it’s a pretty sad state of affairs when we can work on an amendment for three-and-a-half years and come up with seven alternatives, with input from everybody over years and years and years, and then come up and say at the final meeting that nobody supported any of them.”
By the end of that meeting, the council was persuaded by an overwhelming “tidal wave” of public support for Preferred Alternative 7, which proposed to establish a “buffer zone” to protect herring from the ultra-high efficiency of pair and single midwater trawlers.
As a result, the midwater herring trawl fleet found itself prohibited from the inshore Gulf of Maine—Area 1A—for four months of the year. Of course, midwater trawlers do have the option of switching over to purse seine gear, but that can be an investment upwards of $500,000.
A matter of scale
The premise behind the need to limit midwater trawl activity in Area 1A was based on reports that the gear employed by midwater trawlers, notably pair trawlers, is of a scale so large that its dead discard rate dwarfed that of the traditional purse seine gear, which at one time was the dominant gear type in the herring fishery.
Indeed, during the Amendment 1 process, many folks testified how they saw localized depletion of herring in the inshore Gulf of Maine as pair trawling increased while purse seining decreased. As a result, total mortality on herring from those midwater trawlers working in that area could actually be much higher than the 60,000 metric tons (mt) of total allowable catch (TAC) set for that area - a figure already described as being “of concern and may be excessive” by the Council’s own Scientific and Statistical Committee back in June of 2003.
Why it happened
The reason why the Amendment 1 process took so long and ended up as it did was due to many things. However, unquestionably the overriding factor was that a few powerful factions within the herring industry were unwilling to budge, even a little bit, when it came to working with many of the other valid stakeholders who rely so much on a healthy and abundant inshore herring resource.
I think lobbyist Jeff Kaelin summed up the position and attitude for the majority of the midwater fleet well on July 2004 when he testified, “We are very much opposed to any restrictions in Area 1A at all.”
The herring fishery is a public resource. The sooner the midwater lobby realizes this and opens up to the notion of cooperation and compromise, then the better for all.
Reduced TAC desired
During the herring specification process, which preceded the amendment process, it was the hope of commercial groundfishermen, tuna fishermen, environmentalists, recreational fishermen, whale watch groups, and a growing number of others to reduce the Area 1A TAC by 15,000 mt, equivalent to 25 percent.
This seemed reasonable since the long-term goal of the herring management plan was to develop the relatively untapped TACs in the offshore areas. In turn, this would also help spread fishing effort out.
When that motion failed, a very modest reduction of 5,000 metric tons (eight percent) was proposed.
At the time, the executive director of the Massachusetts Fisheries Recovery Commission, Vito Calomo, helped to derail the motion by imploring, “The 5,000 mt in the scope of the whole herring plan really isn't a lot, but the 5,000 mt taken out of 1A is a tremendous amount.”
When that motion also failed, the focus for many then turned toward limiting the impact of massive midwater trawlers inshore for the above stated reasons.
Too late
Now fast forward to November 2005 when the New England council was debating the merits of Alternative 7. When push came to shove and it was near certainty that the council was going to prohibit late entrants to the Area 1A herring fishery, suddenly Calomo saw the light.
“Reduce the TAC. Not reduce the people who fish for the TAC,” he insisted. “If we are concerned so much about Area 1A, reduce the TAC,” Calomo repeated. The fact of the matter is that this whole mess could have been avoided long ago if Calomo and others were just a wee bit more flexible and open to compromise and cooperation on reducing the Area 1A TAC over a year ago.
Unfortunately, since he and others shot that option down earlier on in the process, an Area 1A reduction wasn’t even on the table as part of any of the Amendment 1 alternatives. So by that point, the council couldn't have reduced the TAC even if it wanted to.
The missed opportunities for the herring lobby to work together with everyone else are endless. One can go as far back as four years ago to when representatives of the Coalition for the Atlantic Herring Fishery’s Orderly, Informed, and Responsible Long-Term Development (CHOIR) approached the East Coast Pelagic Association (ECPA) and others to hammer out a small, voluntary, five-square-mile area as an experimental buffer zone.
As CHOIR’s Rich Ruais testified at a May 2005 meeting of the herring oversight committee, “They walked away from us on that. Absolutely no help whatsoever. We repeatedly had meetings whether it was in Rockland, ME or Gloucester, MA. Absolutely nothing came from any effort to work with ECPA on this issue.”
Joe Jancewicz of the East Coast Tuna Association added, “I was at those meetings up in Rockland in the O'Hara building when we tried for the compromise. I was the one who drew out on the chart what would be nice to compromise with. We pretty much got laughed out of the building.”
Now ECPA and all other midwater trawlers are banned from all of Area 1A for four months of the year. I wonder if they now wish they gave more consideration to the much smaller area when they had the chance?
APA effort commended
Out of all of this, there was one very notable example of cooperation. In the hope of hammering out a “compromise alternative,” the herring boats based out of New Bedford and represented by Peter Moore of the American Pelagic Association (APA) did reach out to CHOIR. Tremendous credit needs to be given here to Moore as his actions were at APA’s peril of being perceived as breaking ranks with the remaining midwater lobby, which continued to cling to its hard-line positions.
As Moore described at the June 2005 New England council meeting in Portland, ME, “We’re really sticking our necks out here in trying to move this compromise ahead.”
The purpose of this “Alternative 8” was to allow midwater trawlers to fish in Area 1A, but only allow two trips per month during the peak season. Alternative 8 had very good support. Unfortunately, because of its late timing, it did not gain enough support from the full council to be included in Amendment 1, as it would have probably further delayed the amendment. However, it remains a shining example of what can be done if folks work together.
As we move forward, whether the topic is herring, groundfish, marine protected areas, or any of the other issues where so many different stakeholders are impacted, I hope that more folks take a moment to reach out to the other side to work on real and reasonable solutions.
"Successful management of striped bass,
and all fish for that matter, is 90 percent
commonsense guesswork."
-- Ted Williams
Well...it didnt take the well funded mwt fleet long to find this thread. 
Linear Mode
