so when you're waiting in line...

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by scottw

Obamarons:

Like I've said before, your one of the least classy people here.

RIJimmy - covering preventive will have a positive ROI after the first year by catching and allowing us to nip major cost illnesses in the bud.

[spence]

Originally Posted by PaulS

RIJimmy - covering preventive will have a positive ROI after the first year by catching and allowing us to nip major cost illnesses in the bud.

Ok Mr. MBA and your catchy "business lingo"

Your investment has a payback of NEVER

The NPV on this SCANDAL is NEGATIVE

Here's your ROI

Scum s#^&#^&#^&#^&#^&g leeches / Hard earned TAXPAYER DOLLARS = SOCIALISM

What don't you get?

-spence

[scottw]

Originally Posted by PaulS

Like I've said before, your one of the least classy people here.

C'MON....coming from you??? one of the least informed people here ...that means absolutely nothing...beyond the admission that you are infact...an "Obamoron" you can't stand the fact that I force you to look at the truth...

"covering preventative"??? you mean, the Obama government forcing private companies, insurance companies, employers...whoever...and ultimately the people paying taxes to "cover preventative" with no co-pay charged... the next thing you need to do is to force/mandate that the people actually to go and get their "free preventative somebody else paid preventative care" on a regular basis or be fined for this to be truly effective...there is really no end to what they can impose and force on the public now...thanks Obamorons

gotta give you guys credit for persistence, you cling desperately to an insane and demonstrably failing and failed ideaology...but you have the little talking points well rehearsed and continue to mock and ridicule those that point out that with facts you are infact socialists and worse (a little honesty would be nice if you are going to continue to bark like a socialist) ...I think that's Rules for Radicals #5 or so...

Rule 5: Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon. It’s hard to counterattack ridicule, and it infuriates the opposition, which then reacts to your advantage

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by scottw

C'MON....coming from you??? one of the least informed people here ...that means absolutely nothing...beyond the admission that you are infact...an "Obamoron" you can't stand the fact that I force you to look at the truth...

[/B]

Why who do I insult here? Anyone who knows me, says I'm low key and even tempered. It seems like your always insulting people. I'm just glad I was raised never to have the hate you (and a couple others) seem to exhibit every day.

I'm one of the least informed why b/c I don't cut and paste all day like you

I just shake my head when I see many of your posts.

[RIJIMMY]

Originally Posted by PaulS

Why who do I insult here? Anyone who knows me, says I'm low key and even tempered. It seems like your always insulting people. I'm just glad I was raised never to have the hate you (and a couple others) seem to exhibit every day.

I'm one of the least informed why b/c I don't cut and paste all day like you

I just shake my head when I see many of your posts.

for the record, you often take a condescending and insulting tone. And unfortunately live up to the liberal stereotype.
Other libs out here at least try to have a dialog.

[The Dad Fisherman]

Originally Posted by RIJIMMY

for the record, you often take a condescending and insulting tone.

How does someone have a "Tone" in a typed message?

[RIJIMMY]

Originally Posted by The Dad Fisherman

How does someone have a "Tone" in a typed message?

whatever.

[detbuch]

Originally Posted by The Dad Fisherman

How does someone have a "Tone" in a typed message?

Plagiarized from Wickipedia (but not cut and pasted, so presumably ok and suitable for PaulS to read):

"Tone is a literary technique that is part of a composition, which encompasses the attitude toward the subject and toward the audience implied in a literary work. Tone may be formal, informal, solemn, somber, playful, serious, ironic, condescending, or many other possible attitudes. . . . All pieces of literature, even official documents, have some sort of tone."

When PaulS accuses ScottW of being one of the least classy people on this site, that has a formal, serious and condescending tone.

Condescension is one of the least classy tones.

[scottw]

Originally Posted by detbuch

Plagiarized from Wickipedia (but not cut and pasted, so presumably ok and suitable for PaulS to read):

"Tone is a literary technique that is part of a composition, which encompasses the attitude toward the subject and toward the audience implied in a literary work. Tone may be formal, informal, solemn, somber, playful, serious, ironic, condescending, or many other possible attitudes. . . . All pieces of literature, even official documents, have some sort of tone."

When PaulS accuses ScottW of being one of the least classy people on this site, that has a formal, serious and condescending tone.

Condescension is one of the least classy tones.

it's OK, I don't take it personally...I think PaulS is funny and I'm sure he's a great guy....and VERY classy.....everytime someone mentions "classy", for some reason, all I can think of is Will Farrell dressed up in a bad 70's outfit....if that's classy, I'm cool w/not being that

TDF sets his "tone" with his avatar, everytime he drops an amusing one-liner observation I glance at Archie and laugh my ass off...good stuff

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by detbuch

Plagiarized from Wickipedia (but not cut and pasted, so presumably ok and suitable for PaulS to read):

"Tone is a literary technique that is part of a composition, which encompasses the attitude toward the subject and toward the audience implied in a literary work. Tone may be formal, informal, solemn, somber, playful, serious, ironic, condescending, or many other possible attitudes. . . . All pieces of literature, even official documents, have some sort of tone."

When PaulS accuses ScottW of being one of the least classy people on this site, that has a formal, serious and condescending tone.

Condescension is one of the least classy tones.

I never said C&Ps, I said C&Ps from biased sites and I don't consider Wikiepedia biased. I've agreed some of my posts prob. are condescending. I still rather be cond. than outright rude and insulting.

[scottw]

Originally Posted by PaulS

Why who do I insult here? Anyone who knows me, says I'm low key and even tempered. It seems like your always insulting people. I'm just glad I was raised never to have the hate you (and a couple others) seem to exhibit every day.

I'm one of the least informed why b/c I don't cut and paste all day like you

I just shake my head when I see many of your posts.

WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA....he can dish but is WAAAY touchy
I cut and paste to back up assertions rather than just repeating tired talking points like"some"...would you prefer video?

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by RIJIMMY

for the record, you often take a condescending and insulting tone. And unfortunately live up to the liberal stereotype.
Other libs out here at least try to have a dialog.

Your prob. right. I come here and most of the time I just see insults so I say why bother trying to have a dialog when its frequently met w/insults.

Originally Posted by scottw

WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA....he can dish but is WAAAY touchy
I cut and paste to back up assertions rather than just repeating tired talking points like"some"...would you prefer video?

As I said, I don't think I insult people the way you do (although I agree with Jimmy, I'm prob. condescending. Anyone can find a c&p from a biased site so why bother?

[scottw]

Originally Posted by PaulS

Your prob. right. I come here and most of the time I just see insults so I say why bother trying to have a dialog when its frequently met w/insults.



As I said, I don't think I insult people the way you do (although I agree with Jimmy, I'm prob. condescending. Anyone can find a c&p from a biased site so why bother?

yes, you should stop it with the hatey-hate-hater insults...

why c/p?....anyone can throw out a talking point with no facts to back it up...so why bother?