Where are the little bass?

[Sea of Atlas]

24 to 30" is the average for Maine this year, however more recently I have found a school with lots of smaller fish 15" to 22". For me 3 to 5 years ago there were a lot more shorts around in bigger numbers, not sure of the cause, that seems open for debate.

[tattoobob]

Originally Posted by Sea of Atlas

24 to 30" is the average for Maine this year, however more recently I have found a school with lots of smaller fish 15" to 22". For me 3 to 5 years ago there were a lot more shorts around in bigger numbers, not sure of the cause, that seems open for debate.

It's because all the 15 to 22 inch fish grew up now they're 24 to 30 inch fish, and a couple of years of bad yoy leaves no small fish

[Sea of Atlas]

Originally Posted by tattoobob

It's because all the 15 to 22 inch fish grew up now they're 24 to 30 inch fish, and a couple of years of bad yoy leaves no small fish

Understood. By cause I mean why does it seem that Maine does not have the numbers of small fish that are being reported in much larger populations elsewhere? If a couple of bad yoy is causing reduced numbers in Maine then I would assume that would affect the numbers that are being reported elsewhere. I still have a lot to learn about migratory factors but I guess being on the fringe in Maine I'm just going to have to learn to be more migratory myself.

[JakeF]

Originally Posted by Sea of Atlas

Understood. By cause I mean why does it seem that Maine does not have the numbers of small fish that are being reported in much larger populations elsewhere? If a couple of bad yoy is causing reduced numbers in Maine then I would assume that would affect the numbers that are being reported elsewhere. I still have a lot to learn about migratory factors but I guess being on the fringe in Maine I'm just going to have to learn to be more migratory myself.

Maine, being at the north end of the migration, will logically see the effects of bad YOY #s before most other areas, especially considering the dismal spawning results in the Kennebeck.

Take a look at this graph put out recently by the ASMFC.



This is a snapshot of the estimated TOTAL coastal numbers.
In 1988 the Recruitment (YoY) was at approx. 5 million fish. During that same year, the Female SSB (Spawning Stock Biomass) was also right at 5 million fish. So in 1988 you have biomass of approx. 10 million pounds of spawning females, and end up with an additional 5 million YoY fish as a result.

In stark contrast is the year 2007. In 2007, we had an estimated 120 million pounds of Female SSB, yet we had a Recruitment level of only 5 million fish, same as 1988.

That's scary to me... and just another indication that something is seriously wrong in the spawning grounds....

During the recent Rhode Island hearing on Addendum II to Amendment 6, I asked Ms. Meserve of the ASMFC, and the RI appointees to the ASMFC, about this specifically and asked if they could give us any information on why the recruitment level is SO low, given the current level of female Spawning Stock Biomass.

They did not have an answer for me. Ms. Meserve DID speculate that it is most likely due to environmental issues in the spawning grounds and confirmed that the fishery is NOT being replenished at anywhere close the the same rate at which it is being depleted, as indicated by the dropping red line on the graph above showing the TOTAL abundance of striped bass in coastal waters.

[Bronko]

I am with you Paul, 1 @ 36 has worked before, and worked well. It is at least a starting point and they can head in either direction as they see fit. But lets put it in action NOW!