|
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Political Threads This section is for Political Threads - Enter at your own risk. If you say you don't want to see what someone posts - don't read it :hihi: |
11-05-2010, 08:57 AM
|
#1
|
lobster = striper bait
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Popes Island Performing Arts Center
Posts: 5,871
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
Just for ha-ha's, here is a link to a CNN website that says that Pres Bush paid over $220,000 in federal income taxes in 2007.
Bush earned $719,000 in 2007 - CNN
Is that just "spin"?
|
You pick the most scrutinized people in the country as examples?
Really?
YOU need the strong coffee this morning.
|
Ski Quicks Hole
|
|
|
11-05-2010, 09:01 AM
|
#2
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,441
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by likwid
You pick the most scrutinized people in the country as examples?
Really?
YOU need the strong coffee this morning.
|
Likwid, you said no one making that much pays that much in taxes. You never said anything about scrutinized people. Your changing your arguments afetr I refute them.
|
|
|
|
11-05-2010, 10:00 AM
|
#3
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Marshfield, Ma
Posts: 2,150
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by likwid
You pick the most scrutinized people in the country as examples?
Really?
YOU need the strong coffee this morning.
|
All I've read of your posts are you scutinizing others posts with one sentence questions and no answers or opinions with substance. Why not provide some substance instead of one line questions?
|
"I know a taxidermy man back home. He gonna have a heart attack when he see what I brung him!"
|
|
|
11-05-2010, 11:04 AM
|
#4
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 10,306
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Piscator
All I've read of your posts are you scutinizing others posts with one sentence questions and no answers or opinions with substance. Why not provide some substance instead of one line questions?
|
Why not ask the OP to provide some backup to his original statement that every single democrats has said that the tax cuts only benefit the rich.
B/c if he doesn't, he has no credibility in anything he ever posts.
|
|
|
|
11-05-2010, 11:32 AM
|
#5
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,441
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaulS
Why not ask the OP to provide some backup to his original statement that every single democrats has said that the tax cuts only benefit the rich.
B/c if he doesn't, he has no credibility in anything he ever posts.
|
Fair question Paul S. I watch Foxnews, CNN, and MSNBC regularly, and I've heard that claim a zillion times. I don't work in a TV studio, so I don't have access to years' worth of video footage. I googled it, and found a ton of sites that said "despite the fact that liberals claim the Bush tax cuts only benefit the rich, here is the proof that's not true...". Alas, I couldn't find a site that listed all of the people who have told that lie.
So my opinion (I can't prove it with physical evidence) is that the liberals invented that lie to further their cause. If you say you never heard anyone say that, I can't do anything about it.
Here are some of these sites I described. None listed specific liberals who said that lie, but all address it in general...
AP Shocker: Bush Tax Cuts Didn't Just Help The Rich
Why do so many liberals say that Bush's tax cuts only helped the wealthy? - Yahoo! Answers
Aren't liberals ignoring facts when claiming that Bush tax cuts helped the rich? - Yahoo! Answers
Tax cuts "for the rich" - Living Lake Country
American Thinker: Lying About Bush's Tax Cuts
Letting The Bush Tax Cuts Expire Will Only Hurt The Rich, Right? | Right Wing News
The Absurd Report Income Taxes: Liberal vs. Present
Did The Bush Tax Cuts Favor The Wealthy | Media | National Center for Policy Analysis | NCPA
from the last link...
""It is politically popular to say that tax cuts benefit the wealthy," said Michael D. Stroup, a Stephen F. Austin University economist who authored the NCPA report. "The accusation does not match the reality."
There are a ton of sites out there that dispel the lie that the Bush tax cuts only benefitted the rich. It stands to reason that something motivated all those people to do the research...i.e., there were those that claimed that the cuts only benefitted the wealthy.
As I said, I can't get youtube clips. But I've heard a million people say it, and it always bothered me. Take it or leave it, your choice.
|
|
|
|
11-05-2010, 11:35 AM
|
#6
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,441
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaulS
Why not ask the OP to provide some backup to his original statement that every single democrats has said that the tax cuts only benefit the rich.
B/c if he doesn't, he has no credibility in anything he ever posts.
|
In my humble opinion, if yuo deny that the Democrats and the media have been making that claim for years, you have no credibility. Because it was everywhere, until the cuts were about to expire, causing 100 percent of us to see tax increases, and thus that myth was exposed as the lie it was.
If you say I have no credibility, I'll have to try and soldier on somehow...
|
|
|
|
11-05-2010, 11:50 AM
|
#7
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 10,306
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
In my humble opinion, if yuo deny that the Democrats and the media have been making that claim for years, you have no credibility. Because it was everywhere, until the cuts were about to expire, causing 100 percent of us to see tax increases, and thus that myth was exposed as the lie it was.
If you say I have no credibility, I'll have to try and soldier on somehow...
|
The pres. said it correctly hundred of times. If you can't back up your original statement you have no credibility. Seems your the only one lying in this post.
|
|
|
|
11-05-2010, 12:02 PM
|
#8
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,441
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaulS
The pres. said it correctly hundred of times. If you can't back up your original statement you have no credibility. Seems your the only one lying in this post.
|
Your problem is, I'm not lying. Thousands of sites are out there to dispel that lie. A professor of economics said that it's "politically popular" to suggest that the cuts only benefitted the wealthy (see the link I posted before). What do you think he meant by that?
|
|
|
|
11-05-2010, 12:06 PM
|
#9
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 12,632
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
A professor of economics said that it's "politically popular" to suggest that the cuts only benefitted the wealthy (see the link I posted before). What do you think he meant by that?
|
dangerous question 
|
|
|
|
11-05-2010, 01:45 PM
|
#10
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 10,306
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
Your problem is, I'm not lying. Thousands of sites are out there to dispel that lie. A professor of economics said that it's "politically popular" to suggest that the cuts only benefitted the wealthy (see the link I posted before). What do you think he meant by that?
|
you said "every single democrat", not thousands of sites. See you have no credibility.
It must suck to have so much hate.
|
|
|
|
11-05-2010, 12:01 PM
|
#11
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 12,632
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaulS
Why not ask the OP to provide some backup to his original statement that every single democrats has said that the tax cuts only benefit the rich.
B/c if he doesn't, he has no credibility in anything he ever posts.
|
oooops...I think he got ya Jim...clearly only most single democrats and Barney Frank has said this....
was that classy?? 
|
|
|
|
11-05-2010, 01:43 PM
|
#12
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 10,306
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by scottw
oooops...I think he got ya Jim...clearly only most single democrats and Barney Frank has said this....
was that classy?? 
|
for you? 
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:20 AM.
|
| |