|
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
StriperTalk! All things Striper |
 |
06-04-2011, 05:53 AM
|
#1
|
Afterhours Custom Plugs
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: R.I.
Posts: 8,664
|
the 25 is the perfect size imho- i put it on 10'-12' rods.
|
|
|
|
06-04-2011, 07:52 AM
|
#2
|
Oblivious // Grunt, Grunt Master
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: over the hill
Posts: 6,682
|
I have both, a 1st gen 22 and a 25 (with a spare 27 spool I haven't felt a need to use).
I think the 25 is the most useful size.
With the 22, the ergonomics seem off and I find it a long reach to use the manual pickup (even though my 22 has a shorter stem than the newer versions).
A 27 might be usful somewhere, but I worry that the larger spool would require a larger collector guide, which in turn means a larger guide progression and heavier rod. Since I build my own rods with small Lowrider collectors (20 or 16M), I consider large spools are a disadvantage.
I like these reels very much, but I suggest learning to check and change seals yourself because eventually they, like all sealed reels, will leak. They are pretty easy to work on once you get the courage to try.
|
|
|
|
06-04-2011, 12:08 PM
|
#3
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: stoughton, ma
Posts: 494
|
I purchased a 25 and a spare 27 spool. After fishing both, I sold the 25 spool and now fish the 27 exclusively. The weight difference is minimal, there is a slight increase in yds/crank, but the casting distance is much better, even with a concept setup.
|
|
|
|
06-04-2011, 05:54 PM
|
#4
|
tapin' up the finger....
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Central NH
Posts: 156
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by rickhern
I purchased a 25 and a spare 27 spool. After fishing both, I sold the 25 spool and now fish the 27 exclusively. The weight difference is minimal, there is a slight increase in yds/crank, but the casting distance is much better, even with a concept setup.
|
what he said. mines a 27, and i have a spare 25 spool for it. you arent going to go wrong with either a 25 or 27. ive fished his also - and to be honest, youd have to be a lot more perceptive than me to tell the difference between the sizes throwing in the dark all night.....
ive used my 27 on rods just under 9 feet, all the way up t0 1322's, 10'6" legends, 132 1MH's and 126's great on all of them
good luck and enjoy!
|
|
|
|
06-05-2011, 09:58 PM
|
#5
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: stoughton, ma
Posts: 494
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Renegade6
what he said. mines a 27, and i have a spare 25 spool for it. you arent going to go wrong with either a 25 or 27. ive fished his also - and to be honest, youd have to be a lot more perceptive than me to tell the difference between the sizes throwing in the dark all night.....
ive used my 27 on rods just under 9 feet, all the way up t0 1322's, 10'6" legends, 132 1MH's and 126's great on all of them
good luck and enjoy!
|
Did you just agree with something I said?  And without any cynical undertones? You feeling OK?
|
|
|
|
06-06-2011, 07:57 AM
|
#6
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: stoughton, ma
Posts: 494
|
If I were only fishing the rocks, I might opt for the 22 but I spend a lot of time in the canal where the 27 gets paired with an Arra 1261MH for throwing big plugs and jigs. It casts VERY well, nearly as well as my emblem 5500 and has loads of cranking power.
|
|
|
|
06-06-2011, 04:21 PM
|
#7
|
Soggy Bottom Boy
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Billerica, Ma.
Posts: 7,260
|
27
|
Surfcasting Full Throttle
Don't judge me Monkey
Recreational Surfcaster 99.9% C&R
|
|
|
 |
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:05 PM.
|
| |