Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
Sorry Zimmy, it's not that I don't get it, it's that I proved you wrong...
The facts may not support your Marxist narrative Zimmy, but them there is still the facts.
If I'm wrong, show me some different facts. I am rational and persuadable.
|
You are also very humble
I said a return to the tax rates on the wealthy of Reagan, Clinton, or Bush 1 for that matter would affect the
YEARLY DEFICITS. We need to reduce the borrowing first. I then followed with
long term deficit reduction requires both tax increases and cuts. Just because you don't understand that, does not mean your statements are facts. I guess supporting the tax policies of each of the last presidents except GWB makes me a Marxist. I am a big boy, you aren't going to make me feel sad or inferior with your name calling. Actual taxes paid by the wealthy has declined since 1995. Why hasn't that policy created a booming economy? Oh wait, Obama wrecked the economy, that's right. I think JohnR's thoughts on capital gains taxes are right on target. The most reasonable analysis of economics, in my opinion (I guess if they were your ideas, they would be facts), is that both taxes and cuts are necessary to solve the long term budget issues. That is not an original idea of mine, but it makes sense based on mathematics. I will admit, you are right, just taxes can't do it. I have pointed that out each time I have posted. Maybe you missed that
Threaded Mode