He pulled the race card

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by scottw

it's not a matter of hiding it, it's to what degree you will be held accountable based on your political persuasion....

democrats may engage in nearly any form of transgression and their supporters in the public and press will overlook, excuse and defend pretty much anything...

you mentioned Nixon...he left office

wanna make a list....????

you make your list of republicans that did bad things and note how it ended for them

I'll make my list and you will see that bad behavior by dems is usually defended and then rewarded

mine is going to take a while so many reprobates, so little time

I'm not a miserable petty ideologue like you who keeps track of things like that. I think both parties are just as bad. I vote for a candidate, not a party. You just thing that I vote all dem. but it is only over the last few years when I think the rep. have swung too far right for me.

[scottw]

Originally Posted by PaulS

I'm not a miserable petty ideologue like you .

right...you are none of those

if your contention is "I think both parties are just as bad."...

prove it .... rather than hurl insults...

let's compare the Tea Party and the Occupiers while we are at it in your non-idealouge, unmiserable, not-even-a-bit-petty and very even-minded thinking approach to everything....since we are also told that both of those "parties" are both "just as bad"


Paul S. QUOTES
" That is not how RIJimmy sees it. As he repeatedly does, if he can find a video or a report of someone from the party he hates, he states it is indicitive of that whole party.

The demographics seem much different b/t the 2 groups. The teabaggers where much older folks so comparing income levels is laughable.

And the teabaggers demands can be summed up in "I don't want to pay any taxes for anything or want any of my taxes to go to support anyone less fortunate than myself"

Every newscast I have seen of the occupiers is of 20 somethings with a small mixture of older folks. The teabaggers were much, much older - and from many of the comments I saw, I would call them idiots, morans, selfish bastards, etc. HA, HA, HA"

The distinction shows up in many ways, not least in the latest police reports.


http://www.bostonglobe.com/opinion/e...LEL/story.html

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by scottw

right...you are none of those

if your contention is "I think both parties are just as bad."...

prove it .... rather than hurl insults...

I'm just telling you how you come across. I have no need to spend time researching which party has more people that commit bad deeds - or searching what was posted in other threads - but if it makes you feel better about yourself, knock yourself out.

If you want to start a thread about the 2 parties, go ahead but stop trying to derail my thread.

Did you see how Cain is now blaming someone from Perry's campaign who use to work previously for Cain? Funny how Cain says he discussed it with him in 2003 or but earlier this week denied knowing anything about it. Maybe this will increase his donations some more?

[scottw]

Originally Posted by PaulS

I'm just telling you how you come across. I have no need to spend time researching which party has more people that commit bad deeds - or searching what was posted in other threads - but if it makes you feel better about yourself, knock yourself out. thanks for the heads up...next time you slither up the pedestal of supposed impartiality and fire off insults it might be good to look inward first

If you want to start a thread about the 2 parties, go ahead but stop trying to derail my thread. I don't think this is YOUR thread

Did you see how Cain is now blaming someone from Perry's campaign who use to work previously for Cain? Funny how Cain says he discussed it with him in 2003 or but earlier this week denied knowing anything about it. Maybe this will increase his donations some more?

maybe

I think "YOUR THREAD" is the one where you declared Cain a sexual harasser without any evidence

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by scottw

maybe

I think "YOUR THREAD" is the one where you declared Cain a sexual harasser without any evidence

your right - sorry about that. I should have said "a thread".

You want me to present evidence Where have you been the last week

[scottw]

Originally Posted by PaulS

your right - sorry about that. I should have said "a thread".

You want me to present evidence Where have you been the last week

if unnamed sources quoting unidentified women speaking on conditions of annonymity about something that we have almost no details of is your standard for "evidence"...and with that you conclude that he is a "sexual harasser"

some might consider that a lynch mob mentality

[Fly Rod]

Regardless of what is being said about Herman Cain recently the latest poll taken Wednesday still has him as the front runner at 26% and Newt is third.

ScottW, you always bring up interesting points about the opposition which the liberal news media never mentions and the liberals seem to forget, maybe a case of altimers.

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by scottw

if unnamed sources quoting unidentified women speaking on conditions of annonymity about something that we have almost no details of is your standard for "evidence"...and with that you conclude that he is a "sexual harasser"

some might consider that a lynch mob mentality

So now that Herman has admitted there was a settlement for sexual harassment, you want other evidence? Maybe there is video evidence?