|
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Political Threads This section is for Political Threads - Enter at your own risk. If you say you don't want to see what someone posts - don't read it :hihi: |
01-25-2012, 09:19 AM
|
#1
|
sick of bluefish
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 8,672
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by scottw
yet you continue to fault Romney....
"Joe the Butcher may pay 24% of his salary while Mitt the millionaire pays 15% of his salary."
and for the...4th time?...he's not paying 15% of his salary, he's paying 15% or so on his capital gains from investments he made with after-tax earned income(salary) which was already taxed at the top maginal rate when it was earned...good grief  Joe the butcher is very likely paying little or no federal income tax when all is said and done if he is in the bottom 60% of earners
|
i never once faulted romney. How can I, he is following the rules?
I fault the rules. Not romney. As is stated earlier, its not just the %, its the deductions and other. A working family making 100K - 300K, while well off is getting SCREWED in taxes. The code is not fair and has not been adjusted.
Not romneys fault.
|
making s-b.com a kinder, gentler place for all
|
|
|
01-25-2012, 09:42 AM
|
#2
|
Registered Grandpa
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: east coast
Posts: 8,592
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RIJIMMY
i never once faulted romney. How can I, he is following the rules?
I fault the rules. Not romney. As is stated earlier, its not just the %, its the deductions and other.
|
Who in their right mind is not going to take advantage of an entitled tax
deduction if they know about it?
The whole progressive tax system needs to be completly overhauled and made into a flat or fair tax program.
It will never happen, too many lawyers, tax consultants and IRS employees
holding the power and Waaay too simple for the Govt. to want to understand.
|
" Choose Life "
|
|
|
01-25-2012, 12:33 PM
|
#3
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Mansfield, MA
Posts: 5,238
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RIJIMMY
i never once faulted romney. How can I, he is following the rules?
I fault the rules. Not romney. As is stated earlier, its not just the %, its the deductions and other. A working family making 100K - 300K, while well off is getting SCREWED in taxes. The code is not fair and has not been adjusted.
Not romneys fault.
|
After I get married next year, AMT is going to be a major concern of mine. But like you said, the rules are screwed up and because I do a lot of independent contract work, my CPA has advised me incorporate, work as an employee of that corporation and it will result in a portion of my earnings only being subject to Capitol Gains Tax, while also potentially helping us avoid AMT. All this work because the AMT is such a screw job.
Is is a messed up? Yup, certainly is.
As they say: don't hate the player, hate the game.
Quote:
Originally Posted by justplugit
It will never happen, too many lawyers, tax consultants and IRS employees
holding the power and Waaay too simple for the Govt. to want to understand.
|
If it's too simple, it can't be easily exploited.
|
|
|
|
01-25-2012, 09:16 PM
|
#4
|
Registered Grandpa
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: east coast
Posts: 8,592
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnnyD
If it's too simple, it can't be easily exploited.
|

|
" Choose Life "
|
|
|
01-26-2012, 08:25 AM
|
#5
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Mansfield
Posts: 4,834
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnnyD
If it's too simple, it can't be easily exploited.
|
Perfect JD. 
|
|
|
|
01-27-2012, 04:39 AM
|
#6
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 12,632
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RIJIMMY
i never once faulted romney. How can I, he is following the rules?
I fault the rules. Not romney. As is stated earlier, its not just the %, its the deductions and other. A working family making 100K - 300K, while well off is getting SCREWED in taxes. The code is not fair and has not been adjusted.
Not romneys fault.
|
you continue to perpetuate the myth that he's not paying as much as he should and that there is a fairness issue that he's on the wrong side of and now that somehow what he pays in capital gains tax actually results in other people, like you, getting screwed...thus we have Warren Buffet's secretary sitting where American Heros have traditionally sat during the State of the Union as a poster child for those paying a higher tax on their "income" than the rich SOB that employs them, of coures we only find out later that this "secretary" makes between 200,000-500,00 dollars a year....sorry Jimmy, but that's exactly what your arguments imply and you fall right into this fairness trap which gets entirely away from the actual issue...
you are getting "screwed" because we have a government that is massively unfunded due to bloat and the current and future promises of entitlement programs...if they decide to tax capital gains on Romney types at 100%(and if you check there are only a small portion of "the rich" that fall into the capital gains class, the rest are paying the top marginal rate on earned income)....you will continue to be screwed because it will not solve the issue....the only serious cuts that Obama has proposed to date are military cuts which will in turn fund Obama Care, so we are gutting the military to create another unaffordable bureaucracy....some here have pointed out the reasons that taxes on capital gains are different than earned income.... do you want your capital gains or retirement investment dividends to be highly taxed at your retirement? I can easily make a credible argument as to why you should pay higher rates based on fairness and the needs of the government bureaucracy and in fairness to those that you have stood on the backs of to get where you are presently...
"adjusting the tax code" so that Romney pays more will not result in you paying less, they have no intention of allowing you to pay less because they have no intention of reducing government, and the nearly half of Americans earning incomes below you while paying little or no federal taxes need your generous contributions because they are enjoying unprecedented govenment benefits ...they will most likely ask you to pay more in the future..it's a fairness thing
"Joe the Butcher may pay 24% of his salary while Mitt the millionaire pays 15% of his salary. That doesn't sit right with most people."
I checked...the average salary for a butcher nationwide is around $30,000...
BLS data reveals that the mean annual wage for butchers and meat cutters is $30,190. Those in the 10th percentile earn $18,060; in the 25th percentile they average $21,850; in the 50th percentile $28,600; in the 75th percentile butchers average $37,380 and in the 90th percentile the average annual salary is $45,500. Most experienced union butchers likely make in the upper range of the bureau's salary spectrum.
Industries
The majority of butchers work for grocery stores, with 89,550 workers earning an annual mean wage of $30,550. Specialty food stores employ 12,770 butchers and meat cutters, who earn an average $27,910. Animal slaughtering and processing companies employ 11,010 workers, who average $27,380 per year. Other general merchandising stores employ 6,000 and pay $32,460 while wholesalers employ 3,220 with average earnings of $30,750. The industry paying the most, the federal government, employs 1,160 butchers and pays an average of $44,270 annually.
I think someone that posts frequently here can tell you what his federal tax liability is very quickly....if you check the tax rates he's likely paying 15% before deductions and eligible for a whole host of benefits
I suppose you can now complain about the inherent unfairness of "Millionaire Mitt" paying the same tax rate on his "salary" as Joe the Butcher  although that would still be only partially credible if at all
congrats JD, to you and your future bride...that is great news... 
Last edited by scottw; 01-27-2012 at 07:18 AM..
|
|
|
|
01-27-2012, 07:31 AM
|
#7
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 12,632
|
Romney's Wiki page is very interesting...no community organizing or terrorist friends in the neighborhood or radical anti-American spiritual advisor "uncles"
In 1990, Romney was asked to return to Bain & Company, which was facing financial collapse.[52] He was announced as its new CEO in January 1991[64][65] (but drew only a symbolic salary of one dollar).[52] Romney managed an effort to restructure the firm's employee stock-ownership plan, real-estate deals and bank loans, while rallying the firm's thousand employees, imposing a new governing structure that included Bain and the other founding partners giving up control, and increasing fiscal transparency.[43][47][52] Within about a year, he had led Bain & Company through a turnaround and returned the firm to profitability without further layoffs or partner defections.[47] He turned Bain & Company over to new leadership and returned to Bain Capital in December 1992.
Millionaire Romney screwed the government out of tax revenue by working for $1!!!!!!
|
|
|
|
01-27-2012, 09:24 AM
|
#8
|
Hardcore Equipment Tester
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Abington, MA
Posts: 6,234
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by scottw
Romney's Wiki page is very interesting...no community organizing or terrorist friends in the neighborhood or radical anti-American spiritual advisor "uncles"
In 1990, Romney was asked to return to Bain & Company, which was facing financial collapse.[52] He was announced as its new CEO in January 1991[64][65] (but drew only a symbolic salary of one dollar).[52] Romney managed an effort to restructure the firm's employee stock-ownership plan, real-estate deals and bank loans, while rallying the firm's thousand employees, imposing a new governing structure that included Bain and the other founding partners giving up control, and increasing fiscal transparency.[43][47][52] Within about a year, he had led Bain & Company through a turnaround and returned the firm to profitability without further layoffs or partner defections.[47] He turned Bain & Company over to new leadership and returned to Bain Capital in December 1992.
Millionaire Romney screwed the government out of tax revenue by working for $1!!!!!!
|
Sounds like the right guy to lead this country out of the crapper. Obama has no business experience like this.
|
Bent Rods and Screaming Reels!
Spot NAZI
|
|
|
01-27-2012, 09:30 AM
|
#9
|
sick of bluefish
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 8,672
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by scottw
you continue to perpetuate the myth that he's not paying as much as he should and that there is a fairness issue that he's on the wrong side of and now that somehow what he pays in capital gains tax actually results in other people, like you, getting screwed...thus we have Warren Buffet's secretary sitting where American Heros have traditionally sat during the State of the Union as a poster child for those paying a higher tax on their "income" than the rich SOB that employs them, of coures we only find out later that this "secretary" makes between 200,000-500,00 dollars a year....sorry Jimmy, but that's exactly what your arguments imply and you fall right into this fairness trap which gets entirely away from the actual issue...
you are getting "screwed" because we have a government that is massively unfunded due to bloat and the current and future promises of entitlement programs...if they decide to tax capital gains on Romney types at 100%(and if you check there are only a small portion of "the rich" that fall into the capital gains class, the rest are paying the top marginal rate on earned income)....you will continue to be screwed because it will not solve the issue....the only serious cuts that Obama has proposed to date are military cuts which will in turn fund Obama Care, so we are gutting the military to create another unaffordable bureaucracy....some here have pointed out the reasons that taxes on capital gains are different than earned income.... do you want your capital gains or retirement investment dividends to be highly taxed at your retirement? I can easily make a credible argument as to why you should pay higher rates based on fairness and the needs of the government bureaucracy and in fairness to those that you have stood on the backs of to get where you are presently...
"adjusting the tax code" so that Romney pays more will not result in you paying less, they have no intention of allowing you to pay less because they have no intention of reducing government, and the nearly half of Americans earning incomes below you while paying little or no federal taxes need your generous contributions because they are enjoying unprecedented govenment benefits ...they will most likely ask you to pay more in the future..it's a fairness thing
"Joe the Butcher may pay 24% of his salary while Mitt the millionaire pays 15% of his salary. That doesn't sit right with most people."
I checked...the average salary for a butcher nationwide is around $30,000...
BLS data reveals that the mean annual wage for butchers and meat cutters is $30,190. Those in the 10th percentile earn $18,060; in the 25th percentile they average $21,850; in the 50th percentile $28,600; in the 75th percentile butchers average $37,380 and in the 90th percentile the average annual salary is $45,500. Most experienced union butchers likely make in the upper range of the bureau's salary spectrum.
Industries
The majority of butchers work for grocery stores, with 89,550 workers earning an annual mean wage of $30,550. Specialty food stores employ 12,770 butchers and meat cutters, who earn an average $27,910. Animal slaughtering and processing companies employ 11,010 workers, who average $27,380 per year. Other general merchandising stores employ 6,000 and pay $32,460 while wholesalers employ 3,220 with average earnings of $30,750. The industry paying the most, the federal government, employs 1,160 butchers and pays an average of $44,270 annually.
I think someone that posts frequently here can tell you what his federal tax liability is very quickly....if you check the tax rates he's likely paying 15% before deductions and eligible for a whole host of benefits
I suppose you can now complain about the inherent unfairness of "Millionaire Mitt" paying the same tax rate on his "salary" as Joe the Butcher  although that would still be only partially credible if at all
congrats JD, to you and your future bride...that is great news... 
|
im not talking debt, Im not talking expense, Im talking tax code. The current tax code is not set up to properly tax today's population. This is not class warfare, this is not about Mitt. said it 10 times, you dont get it. the AMT screws working families.
|
making s-b.com a kinder, gentler place for all
|
|
|
01-27-2012, 03:55 PM
|
#10
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 12,632
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RIJIMMY
im not talking debt, Im not talking expense, Im talking tax code. The current tax code is not set up to properly tax today's population. This is not class warfare, this is not about Mitt. said it 10 times, you dont get it. the AMT screws working families.
|
I know...you've barely mentioned him...
isn't it ironic?
the AMT was created to properly tax yesterday's population and particularly targeted a few high earners, probably a fairness thing..... now it has you feeling all of this unfairness....there's a lesson there
Growth of the AMT
Although the AMT was originally enacted to target 155 high-income households, it now affects millions of middle-income families each year. The number of households that pay the tax has increased significantly in the last decade: In 1997, for example, 605,000 taxpayers paid the AMT;[49] by 2008, the number of affected taxpayers jumped to 3.9 million, or about 4% of individual taxpayers.[50] A total of 27% of households that paid the AMT in 2008 had adjusted gross income of $200,000 or less.
Last edited by scottw; 01-28-2012 at 09:17 AM..
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:23 PM.
|
| |