|
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
StriperTalk! All things Striper |
 |
02-14-2012, 12:26 PM
|
#1
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Middletown, RI
Posts: 304
|
Something here doesn't make sense. The only link posted is to a secure website. Do the guys posting these graphs have any other links to the place where this is coming from?
These graphs certainly don't coincide with data put out by the Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission.
Ed B
|
|
|
|
02-14-2012, 12:54 PM
|
#2
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Bethany CT
Posts: 2,883
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ed B
Something here doesn't make sense. The only link posted is to a secure website. Do the guys posting these graphs have any other links to the place where this is coming from?
These graphs certainly don't coincide with data put out by the Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission.
Ed B
|
I assume they made the graphs with the NOAA data. Which ASMFC data are you talking about? The yoy index that dropped for years up until the most recent one?
|
No, no, no. we’re 30… 30, three zero.
|
|
|
02-14-2012, 06:50 PM
|
#3
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: N. H. Seacoast
Posts: 368
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ed B
Something here doesn't make sense. The only link posted is to a secure website. Do the guys posting these graphs have any other links to the place where this is coming from?
These graphs certainly don't coincide with data put out by the Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission.
Ed B
|
Not sure what happened to the first link but try the link below and select "catch" query. You should be able to get the tables I posted for each state.
You really need to look at the ASMFC tables closely. The 2006 to2011 data shows about a 33% decrease in recreational kept but then it shows about a 75% decrease in the release numbers. If you add the C&R numbers together you see a decrease of about 70% decrease. This is on page 18 of the 2011 assessment. If you look at the table on page 19 you will see that the states at the North and South ends of the range have seen the biggest drops.
ASMFC says that stripers are not overfished because the stock numbers are above the SSB Threshold. Problem is in my opinion if we drop the stock to the Threshold number Maine, NH, Mass North Shore, VA, NC will not have a migratory stripe bass fishery.
http://www.st.nmfs.noaa.gov/st1/recr...ies/index.html
|
|
|
|
02-15-2012, 09:56 AM
|
#4
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Middletown, RI
Posts: 304
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeToole
Not sure what happened to the first link but try the link below and select "catch" query. You should be able to get the tables I posted for each state.
You really need to look at the ASMFC tables closely. The 2006 to2011 data shows about a 33% decrease in recreational kept but then it shows about a 75% decrease in the release numbers. If you add the C&R numbers together you see a decrease of about 70% decrease. This is on page 18 of the 2011 assessment. If you look at the table on page 19 you will see that the states at the North and South ends of the range have seen the biggest drops.
ASMFC says that stripers are not overfished because the stock numbers are above the SSB Threshold. Problem is in my opinion if we drop the stock to the Threshold number Maine, NH, Mass North Shore, VA, NC will not have a migratory stripe bass fishery.
Recreational Fisheries Statistics Queries
|
Thanks for the link Mike. I have been running cases looking at angler effort. Something of note is that I see a significant reduction in Angler Effort for striped bass. Just a few years ago it looks like Angler Effort was in the order of 50% higher than what it was in 2011. Based on that, I would certainly expect a significant reduction in striped bass caught and also caught and released. I can see why the data as you queried shows a big drop, as fewer people pursue fewer fish.
Ed B
|
|
|
|
02-15-2012, 10:25 AM
|
#5
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Mass.
Posts: 12
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ed B
Thanks for the link Mike. I have been running cases looking at angler effort. Something of note is that I see a significant reduction in Angler Effort for striped bass. Just a few years ago it looks like Angler Effort was in the order of 50% higher than what it was in 2011. Based on that, I would certainly expect a significant reduction in striped bass caught and also caught and released. I can see why the data as you queried shows a big drop, as fewer people pursue fewer fish.
Ed B
|
I pulled the data from their site and calculated "Stripers per Trip" to account for the decline in fishing effort. The results still show a decline underway but it doesn't look as dramatic. Another trend that came out of this is the increasing percentage of fish that are harvested. This is not surprising given the big decline in small fish over the past few years.
|
|
|
|
02-15-2012, 12:39 PM
|
#6
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Bethany CT
Posts: 2,883
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alhbg
The results still show a decline underway but it doesn't look as dramatic.
|
Follow the curve. About 2 or 3 more seasons until we are back to 1984 levels. Not a pretty picture.
|
No, no, no. we’re 30… 30, three zero.
|
|
|
02-15-2012, 12:52 PM
|
#7
|
Oblivious // Grunt, Grunt Master
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: over the hill
Posts: 6,682
|
Last year's good YOY will provide plenty of fish in two to three years. The issue will be quality. It will be a decade before those fish are worth catching. What is left out there now will be long gone under current rules. So unnecessary, so stupid, so predictable.
|
|
|
|
02-15-2012, 12:48 PM
|
#8
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: N. H. Seacoast
Posts: 368
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ed B
Thanks for the link Mike. I have been running cases looking at angler effort. Something of note is that I see a significant reduction in Angler Effort for striped bass. Just a few years ago it looks like Angler Effort was in the order of 50% higher than what it was in 2011. Based on that, I would certainly expect a significant reduction in striped bass caught and also caught and released. I can see why the data as you queried shows a big drop, as fewer people pursue fewer fish.
Ed B
|
I guess you also have to look at why the effort numbers are so much lower. Last season on most nights I would only see a couple of people fishing, normally the same two guys. A few years ago it was normal to run into a dozen or more fisherman each night. During the day there was always some bait fisherman out but last year very few. The reason being is there just were to few fish around. Many of the people I knew who fish Maine, NH and Mass North shore have either stopped or greatly reduced their trips.
What is also happening is people like me are now making more trips to the canal and the cape. So as the fish range decreases you can expect to see an increase in the number of people fishing those areas.
|
|
|
|
02-15-2012, 01:23 PM
|
#9
|
Jiggin' Leper Lawyer
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: 61° 30′ 0″ N, 23° 46′ 0″ E
Posts: 8,158
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeToole
What is also happening is people like me are now making more trips to the canal and the cape. So as the fish range decreases you can expect to see an increase in the number of people fishing those areas.
|
For the first time in my life, I stopped fishing the Canal before Columbus Day, last fall. There were some fish to be caught, but it just wasn't worth the effort.
Even as late as 2009, I had 50-60 fish nights early in the fall run.
Guys I know who hit it hard every night between mid-September and the start of bird season had the worst fall of the last 25 years.
|
Wise men speak because they have something to say; Fools, because they have to say something.
|
|
|
 |
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:51 AM.
|
| |