MSBA's role in Striper Hearings?.....and a proposal.

[JohnnyD]

Originally Posted by fishsmith

I don't favor stripers being designated a game fish, and agree with the words of this charter captain.

Peter Kelly, a charter captain from Marion, said he has been fishing in Massachusetts waters for more than 45 years. He theorized that the warmer water in the past few years was driving more fish further off the coast. That is why recreational fishermen, who cannot afford to fuel boats to go further out, may be seeing less fish, he said.

“As fuel keeps going up, recreational catches are going to keep going down,” Kelly said.

Sounds like just another unsupported claim. Tens of thousands of square miles of ocean, one person's or a few people's experience isn't valid.

It's like looking at the stars through a pinhole in a piece of paper and claiming that you can make valid estimates about the cosmos based on that pinhole view.

[fishsmith]

Originally Posted by JohnnyD

It's like looking at the stars through a pinhole in a piece of paper and claiming that you can make valid estimates about the cosmos based on that pinhole view.

We all have our opinions. I second the belief that the fish have moved offshore based on my own experience, and if my opinion is a pinhole in a piece of paper, so be it. but my pinhole view is becuase I've focused more on tuna fishing fishing than bass fishing. While dropping butterfly's or sluggos looking for tuna on many days has led to bass on every drop. If using live pogies on these same days, it's torture, what would normally be a 'best day ever' landing 30+lb bass is disappointing because your $5 pogie is not getting hit by a BFT and you're landing bass on 50wt gear.

Counting fish is no where near accurate, if it was, why was there a moratorium on dogfishing (another topic, but I think those things are big reason for poor cod stocks)? Dogs can regularly be seen finning on top from p-town to cape ann.

[JohnnyD]

Originally Posted by fishsmith

Counting fish is no where near accurate, if it was, why was there a moratorium on dogfishing (another topic, but I think those things are big reason for poor cod stocks)? Dogs can regularly be seen finning on top from p-town to cape ann.

If counting fish is no where near accurate, then how can anecdotal stories of a few people that saw a lot of bass be any more valid?

[fishsmith]

Originally Posted by JohnnyD

If counting fish is no where near accurate, then how can anecdotal stories of a few people that saw a lot of bass be any more valid?

Good we agree.

Let's work on that world peace issue next.

Fisherman for Romney in 2012

[big jay]

Originally Posted by JohnnyD

If counting fish is no where near accurate, then how can anecdotal stories of a few people that saw a lot of bass be any more valid?

Anecdotal stories and innuendo is the only thing you've brought to table for the last 2 weeks of this conversation.

I guess that's
only allowed if the person agrees with you.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[JohnnyD]

Originally Posted by big jay

Anecdotal stories and innuendo is the only thing you've brought to table for the last 2 weeks of this conversation.

I guess that's
only allowed if the person agrees with you.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

The last two weeks? Mostly.

Before that? I've brought up the pathetic YOY numbers relative to the spawning stock size, the very significant risk that Myco is creating with 70+% of the bass in the Chesapeake, the close relationship between widespread reports before the last crash and recent seasons, the widespread slaughter of big bass in the EEZ down south, not to mention the blatant poaching that's met with a slap on the wrist... not much innuendo in any of those points.

Yet the counterargument to any of the above by those blinded by dollars is "there was a huge school off Chatham all season" or "from what I saw, the bass are fine" or my favorite "well that one survey shows that the bass stocks haven't reached critical levels yet."