Quote:
Originally Posted by zimmy
"the real criminals?" They are criminals, yes, but the real criminals implies that the guy who follows and shoots an unarmed kid is not a criminal. That isn't what you meant, is it?
|
Zimmy, you liberals crack me up. You all still have egg dripping on your faces from the Duke lacrosse case. Remember that? In the immediate aftermath of that accusation, all the liberals were crucifying the accused lacrosse players, the NAACP established a college scholarship fund for the victim (who turned out to be a murderer). Do ANY liberals remember how that turned out?
Despite recent empirical evidence showing how stupid it is to jump to conclusions, all of the same liberal hucksters are now saying the exact same things about this case. Earth to liberals...they are investigating. A special state prosecutor has been assigned, and the Justice Dept is looking into federal violations. If Zimmerman broke the law, he'll answer for that. But how about we let the pro's determine which, if any, laws were actually broken here. There is a presumption of innocence in this country, and that applies even when the deceased happens to be black.
Threaded Mode