Jeb Bush says Reagan would have no place in current GOP

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by PaulS

We're at this site b/c we love the outdoors, yet if someone proposes a law to help protect it, he gets bricks thrown at him.
.

You're saying that conservatives resort to anarchy when we don't get our way? That's a good one.

Paul, please tell me what percentage of violent riots you think are led by angry conservatives?

Liberals resort to environmental terrorism, not conservatives.

As usual, you literally could not be more wrong in your statement.

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by detbuch

How has the Democrat party been less partisan than the Republican?

Do the Dem. leaders make idiotic statements like the most imp. thing is to defeat the pres- not the economy, not the war?

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

You're saying that conservatives resort to anarchy when we don't get our way? That's a good one. I forgot where I said that- can you point it out? Is that what you think "throwing bricks" means?

Paul, please tell me what percentage of violent riots you think are led by angry conservatives? Where did that idiotic question come from? How about what percentage of teabaggers are racist? Or how about what percentage of pres. death threats are by angry conservates?

Liberals resort to environmental terrorism, not conservatives.You mean taking off the top of mountains in WV?

As usual, you literally could not be more wrong in your statement.

And as usual your wrong and come across as an angry, pathetic, partisan person. I don't rant, you do. Look at all your posts. 99% of them are in the political forum and are usually crying about some percieved action by liberals. Post some more b/c I enjoy seeing the anger which seems to drive you. I could care less if you want to Alaska. Tell us more about your military or church service.

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by PaulS

Do the Dem. leaders make idiotic statements like the most imp. thing is to defeat the pres- not the economy, not the war?



And as usual your wrong and come across as an angry, pathetic, partisan person. I don't rant, you do. Look at all your posts. 99% of them are in the political forum and are usually crying about some percieved action by liberals. Post some more b/c I enjoy seeing the anger which seems to drive you. I could care less if you want to Alaska. Tell us more about your military or church service.

Paul, you said that if someone proposed a clean water act, a conservative would throw a brick at them. That's anarchy. Stop obsessing about the hyper-technical details...the point is, your post painted conservatives as some cartoonish, dastardly capitalist dedicated to raping the land. Sorry, no truth, or very little truth at best, to that.

"Do the Dem. leaders make idiotic statements"

Actually, yes. Just this week, Obama said "the private sector is doing fine". Tell that to the millions of people looking for work in the private sector. Last week, Obama said something "idiotic" about Polish death camps...

You don't admit that Joe Biden (the VP certainly counts as a democratic leader) makes idiotic statements?

How many examples do you want of Democratic leaders making idiotic statements? Conservatives believe that everyone, even Catholics, have the right to practice religion. For that, democrat leaders say that conservatives have waged a "war against women"? Most conservatives believe that public unionized benefits need to be curtailed, because states simply cannot pay for them. For that, democrat leaders claim that conservatives "only care about the rich". Those are idiotic, partisan statements. Finally, when Paul Ryan points out that Medicare is going bankrupt, democratic leaders make a commercial of him pushing an old lady off a cliff. That's not idiotic? Is that the democrat's idea of reaching across the aisle to work with conservatives? That's designed to encourage thoughtful debate?

When people like me say "Obama must be defeated", it's synonymous with saying "the economy needs to be fixed". In our opinion, Obama's agenda is causing serious harm to the economy. You. however, cannot accept the fact that we have reasonable justification to say "Obama must be defeated", you assume that statement must be based on racism.

Paul, you said conservatives would throw a brick if someone proposed a clean water act. I asked you to support that, and all you can do is call me a hate-monger. That's precisely what liberals do when they have backed themselves into an intellectual corner from which there is no escape.

No anger or hate in my posts here. I simply asked you to support your deranged claims.

[Jim in CT]

PaulS accuses me of hate, and then he posts this...

"How about what percentage of teabaggers are racist?"

He posts this bile, and still has the chutzpah to accuse me of hate.

How long, O' Lord?

Paul, I'll talk about race all day long. Are there racists in the Tea Party? Yes. Is it widespread? No. Here's proof...the tea party ideals are exactly what poor blacks need to embrace, in order to escape the shackles of poverty. We want as many blacks as possible to be self-supporting and wealthy. If I was racist, I'd be supporting liberal policies at the top of my lungs, policies which have encouraged blacks to become addicted to welfare, and encouraged blacks to have illegitimate kids. That all but guarantees poverty.

You want to see genuine, widespread racism? You won't see it at the Tea Party. Try Rev Wright's church.

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

PaulS accuses me of hate, and then he posts this...

"How about what percentage of teabaggers are racist?"

He posts this bile, and still has the chutzpah to accuse me of hate.
Just responding in kind to your hate. Tell us again how involved you are in your church and what a good guy you are
How long, O' Lord?

Paul, I'll talk about race all day long. Are there racists in the Tea Party? Yes. Is it widespread? No. Sure it is. They had local teabag leaders with signs. Then when the heat got to be too much, everyone got the teabaggers to lay off with the racist signs.

Is that bile also?

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

Paul, you said that if someone proposed a clean water act, a conservative would throw a brick at them. That's anarchy. So again I ask is that what you think "throwing bricks" means?Stop obsessing about the hyper-technical details...Coming from someone who constantly posts part of a Dems. statements and crying about it? Seems like your the one "obsessing about details"the point is, your post painted conservatives as some cartoonish, dastardly capitalist dedicated to raping the land where did I say that? I gave you a few example of great environ. acts by past Repub. leaders. Where are the great environmentalist in the Repub. party today? . Sorry, no truth, or very little truth at best, to thatAgain, I've already asked you a few times to show me where I've said something or to clarify exactly what you think a term is b/c you seem to be trying to twist things..

No anger or hate in my posts here. I simply asked you to support your deranged claims.

So what was "deranged"? The statement that if someone proposed the clean water act today, people would throw bricks at them?

I think an unbiased person would looking at both our post history would say your the one with a lot of anger and hate.