|
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Political Threads This section is for Political Threads - Enter at your own risk. If you say you don't want to see what someone posts - don't read it :hihi: |
08-10-2012, 05:23 AM
|
#1
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 12,632
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by zimmy
Some might say pushing and signing a bill that will ensure health care for millions of people comes somewhat close to that.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
hope he tries to run on that one
The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA),[1] informally referred to as Obamacare,[2] is a United States federal statute signed into law by President Barack Obama on March 23, 2010
January 24, 2012
More Americans Uninsured in 2011
However, more adults aged 18 to 26 now covered
by Elizabeth Mendes
This is the first article in an in-depth series on the state of health insurance coverage in America. Future articles will explore trends in types of health insurance coverage and uninsured rates across states.
WASHINGTON, D.C. -- More American adults lacked health insurance coverage last year than in any year since Gallup and Healthways started tracking it in 2008. The uninsured rate has been increasing since 2008, climbing to 17.1% in 2011.
at least we're covering more "children" ages 18-26...good place to start or reinforce the road to government dependence  oh wait....we're actually forcing insurance companies to accept them as children so that they can stay on mommy and daddy's policy....
Young Adults Seem to Benefit From New Healthcare Law
U.S. adults aged 18 to 25 -- who are now allowed to stay on their parents' plans until age 26 because of a provision of the 2010 healthcare law -- are less likely to be uninsured than in previous years. The percentage of uninsured declined further in 2011 to 24.5%, from 27.6% in 2010 and 28.2% in 2009. Although this group is still among the most likely to be uninsured, it is the only group Gallup tracks that has seen a significant decline in the percentage uninsured in 2011.
should have made it 36.....then the numbers would be really inmpressive 
Last edited by scottw; 08-10-2012 at 05:28 AM..
|
|
|
|
08-10-2012, 08:27 AM
|
#2
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Bethany CT
Posts: 2,883
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by scottw
hope he tries to run on that one
The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA),[1] informally referred to as Obamacare,[2] is a United States federal statute signed into law by President Barack Obama on March 23, 2010
January 24, 2012
More Americans Uninsured in 2011
However, more adults aged 18 to 26 now covered
by Elizabeth Mendes
This is the first article in an in-depth series on the state of health insurance coverage in America. Future articles will explore trends in types of health insurance coverage and uninsured rates across states.
WASHINGTON, D.C. -- More American adults lacked health insurance coverage last year than in any year since Gallup and Healthways started tracking it in 2008. The uninsured rate has been increasing since 2008, climbing to 17.1% in 2011.
Most of the law isnt in effect. You wanted to point out that one of the few parts that went into effect has lowered the uninsured rate?
at least we're covering more "children" ages 18-26...good place to start or reinforce the road to government dependence  oh wait....we're actually forcing insurance companies to accept them as children so that they can stay on mommy and daddy's policy....
Young Adults Seem to Benefit From New Healthcare Law
U.S. adults aged 18 to 25 -- who are now allowed to stay on their parents' plans until age 26 because of a provision of the 2010 healthcare law -- are less likely to be uninsured than in previous years. The percentage of uninsured declined further in 2011 to 24.5%, from 27.6% in 2010 and 28.2% in 2009. Although this group is still among the most likely to be uninsured, it is the only group Gallup tracks that has seen a significant decline in the percentage uninsured in 2011.
should have made it 36.....then the numbers would be really inmpressive 
|
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
Most of the law isnt in effect. You wanted to point out that one of the few parts that went into effect has lowered the uninsured rate?
|
No, no, no. we’re 30… 30, three zero.
|
|
|
08-10-2012, 03:44 PM
|
#3
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 12,632
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by zimmy
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
Most of the law isnt in effect. You wanted to point out that one of the few parts that went into effect has lowered the uninsured rate?
|
I could be wrong but I'd be willing to bet that most of those 18-26 year olds would prefer a job to a free ride on their parents health insurance policy and a room in their basement 
|
|
|
|
08-10-2012, 04:01 PM
|
#4
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,441
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by scottw
I could be wrong but I'd be willing to bet that most of those 18-26 year olds would prefer a job to a free ride on their parents health insurance policy and a room in their basement 
|
I hope you're right. But the fact that a large majority of those 18-26 year olds will vote for Obama, makes me think they'd prefer a handout.
How do you add $4 trillion to the debt, and still have unemployment over 8%...Not much to show for that expenditure...
|
|
|
|
08-10-2012, 07:23 PM
|
#5
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Bethany CT
Posts: 2,883
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by scottw
I could be wrong but I'd be willing to bet that most of those 18-26 year olds would prefer a job to a free ride on their parents health insurance policy and a room in their basement 
|
Luckily, pretty soon after we got the current president, we stopped purging jobs. I know, don't blame Bush
" For each job the private sector cut under George W. Bush, the private sector gained~0.09 jobs under Barack Obama (if one attributes January 2009′s job losses to Obama, the private sector eliminated ~5 jobs for every job it created under Bush). The economy would need to destroy 701,000 private sector jobs for Bush to break even with Obama (not accounting for the 125,000 jobs that the economy must create each month just to keep pace with population growth)."
Bush vs. Obama: Unemployment (May 2012 Jobs Data) | Reflections of a Rational Republican
|
No, no, no. we’re 30… 30, three zero.
|
|
|
08-10-2012, 08:57 PM
|
#6
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 12,632
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by zimmy
Luckily, pretty soon after we got the current president, we stopped purging jobs. I know, don't blame Bush
" For each job the private sector cut under George W. Bush, the private sector gained~0.09 jobs under Barack Obama (if one attributes January 2009′s job losses to Obama, the private sector eliminated ~5 jobs for every job it created under Bush). The economy would need to destroy 701,000 private sector jobs for Bush to break even with Obama (not accounting for the 125,000 jobs that the economy must create each month just to keep pace with population growth)."
Bush vs. Obama: Unemployment (May 2012 Jobs Data) | Reflections of a Rational Republican
|
I hope he tries to run on that too
Obama’s remarks on worst job growth: Did he end it or should he own it? - The Washington Post
The Pinocchio Test
There’s no doubt that Bush owns an unimpressive record on job creation. But Obama comes in either last, second-to-last or in the bottom half among presidents since the Great Depression, depending on which way you look at the numbers. considering all of the money he spent saving and creating jobs..you'd think he'd have better results
The president said that policies from 2000 through 2008 produced the “most sluggish job growth we’ve ever seen.” Perhaps so, but the worst numbers on record occurred under his watch.
Obama chose a poor metric for measuring past administrations. To make his point with jobs data, he has to point to his own numbers and completely disavow much of them, or else ignore public-sector losses. We came close to thinking this was worth Three Pinocchios, but ultimately decided he was not necessarily including his record in the statement oh....just give him 4 he's earned it . Still, it’s a very fine line. The president should be much more careful about making such a sweeping claim.
|
|
|
|
08-10-2012, 09:15 PM
|
#7
|
Certifiable Intertidal Anguiologist
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Somewhere between OOB & west of Watch Hill
Posts: 35,273
|
Three pages and I have a headache - time to roll a new thread
|
~Fix the Bait~ ~Pogies Forever~
Striped Bass Fishing - All Stripers
Kobayashi Maru Election - there is no way to win.
Apocalypse is Coming:
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:28 PM.
|
| |