Sea Pirates?? Here's the real deal.

[4boats]

What you are describing is not even a salvage situation. The price for both TOW cases would be the same.The fee is not based on the wallet. If these two boats where in salvage situations the fee also would be the same. If you listen closely you may learn a little about salvage law. Sometimes the fee is based on hull value other times it could be based on a per foot basis. The insurance companies are willing to pay salvors for efforts that save the insurance companies money. The insurance company does not want a boat to get damaged,so they will gladly pay salvors that prevent that damage. I think everyone is trying to teach you a little bit about salvage law, because you dont agree with that law does not make the law wrong. Laws are Laws and we get paid based on the laws of salvage.

[Sea Dangles]

Don't bother Casey,Ed is a slow learner and historically reluctant to admit he is wrong.

[ecduzitgood]

Originally Posted by 4boats

What you are describing is not even a salvage situation. The price for both TOW cases would be the same.The fee is not based on the wallet. If these two boats where in salvage situations the fee also would be the same. If you listen closely you may learn a little about salvage law. Sometimes the fee is based on hull value other times it could be based on a per foot basis. The insurance companies are willing to pay salvors for efforts that save the insurance companies money. The insurance company does not want a boat to get damaged,so they will gladly pay salvors that prevent that damage. I think everyone is trying to teach you a little bit about salvage law, because you dont agree with that law does not make the law wrong. Laws are Laws and we get paid based on the laws of salvage.

If you see his post (post9) he does indeed say my scenerio would be considerred a salvage.
to qouteThis is indeed grounds for a salvage

Originally Posted by Sea Dangles

Don't bother Casey,Ed is a slow learner and historically reluctant to admit he is wrong.

I just wanted answer based upon what had already been said. Just because someone is persistant doesn't necessarily mean they are reluctant to admit they are wrong. We (seadogg and I)have discussed it through pm and guess what I chose do back off.
If I am so wrong please point out where or just back off like I have. In advance I thank for your understanding. Good enough?

[ecduzitgood]

Originally Posted by Sea Dangles

Don't bother Casey,Ed is a slow learner and historically reluctant to admit he is wrong.

Maybe it's the meds but I can't help but wonder what I have done to provoke you? Perhaps you can give an example so I may learn. Would you allow someone to say this about you without asking why or what they mean?
I am pretty sick and tired of catching crap from others just because I stand by my opinion. I don't recall many members here stepping up to defend me so basically it's time to see where I stand. Perhaps it's time for me to go, perhaps we should start a poll. You can kick a dog only so long before they fight back. When have I shown this level of disrespect?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[MakoMike]

Originally Posted by 4boats

What you are describing is not even a salvage situation. The price for both TOW cases would be the same.The fee is not based on the wallet. If these two boats where in salvage situations the fee also would be the same. If you listen closely you may learn a little about salvage law. Sometimes the fee is based on hull value other times it could be based on a per foot basis. The insurance companies are willing to pay salvors for efforts that save the insurance companies money. The insurance company does not want a boat to get damaged,so they will gladly pay salvors that prevent that damage. I think everyone is trying to teach you a little bit about salvage law, because you dont agree with that law does not make the law wrong. Laws are Laws and we get paid based on the laws of salvage.

Amen!