|
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Movies, Classics to Less than Normal By request - Grab your Popcorn. New Movie forum (for those that have given up fishing this year). (No P 0rn) |
 |
12-26-2012, 12:05 PM
|
#1
|
Not Jack
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Other Cape
Posts: 1,239
|
I'm with RIJ. Thought it was pretty mediocre, actually.
It seemed like they were trying SO hard to tie it into LOTR- unnecessary, it just detracted from the story. It's way too long- the movie smacks of hollywood producers saying "the last three movies made us a bajillion dollars, lets make this one a trilogy too!" Nevermind the fact that the Hobbit is about a half of the length of a single LOTR entry... They added too much unnecessary backstory to the Hobbit to stretch it out, and cut too much out of LOTR to fit it in...
Plus, I really think there was just too much fighting. I'm all for action, there was just gratuitous amounts. Part of the charm of the Hobbit was how they solve problems with wit versus weapons- the troll camp, for example. In the movie it's just "RAWR LETS HIT IT WITH AN AXE". I know they need to make it more "actiony" for the big screen but it seemed to do a disservice to the source material.
But for all of this, it's good to see Tolkien on the big screen. I'll still see the other entries because I'm a Tolkien nut. Definitely recommend just seeing the 2D version- there really wasn't anything added in the iMax 3d version other than a couple arrows whizzing by. Save the loot.
6/10
|
|
|
|
12-27-2012, 11:56 AM
|
#2
|
sick of bluefish
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 8,672
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JackK
I'm with RIJ. Thought it was pretty mediocre, actually.
It seemed like they were trying SO hard to tie it into LOTR- unnecessary, it just detracted from the story. It's way too long- the movie smacks of hollywood producers saying "the last three movies made us a bajillion dollars, lets make this one a trilogy too!" Nevermind the fact that the Hobbit is about a half of the length of a single LOTR entry... They added too much unnecessary backstory to the Hobbit to stretch it out, and cut too much out of LOTR to fit it in...
Plus, I really think there was just too much fighting. I'm all for action, there was just gratuitous amounts. Part of the charm of the Hobbit was how they solve problems with wit versus weapons- the troll camp, for example. In the movie it's just "RAWR LETS HIT IT WITH AN AXE". I know they need to make it more "actiony" for the big screen but it seemed to do a disservice to the source material.
But for all of this, it's good to see Tolkien on the big screen. I'll still see the other entries because I'm a Tolkien nut. Definitely recommend just seeing the 2D version- there really wasn't anything added in the iMax 3d version other than a couple arrows whizzing by. Save the loot.
6/10
|
wow, good synopsis! I too thought it was too action oriented. I explained to my kids that the Hobbit was sort of a witty, humorous adventure story. All the LOTR tie ins detracted from the main story. Im with you also on Tolkien on the big screen, I really enjoy watching after growing up on these books.
|
making s-b.com a kinder, gentler place for all
|
|
|
12-27-2012, 12:25 PM
|
#3
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Libtardia
Posts: 21,694
|
violence sells.
|
|
|
|
12-27-2012, 10:49 PM
|
#4
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: orange ct
Posts: 2,992
|
I have not seen it yet. Any sign of the Ent wives?
|
|
|
|
12-30-2012, 05:54 AM
|
#5
|
........
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 22,805
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nebe
violence sells.
|
Nothing beats the Lopping OFF of ORC heads
except Thorin admitting he was WRONG about Bilbo baggins
his Burglur.... and the subsequent Big Hug for the little brave guy 
|
|
|
|
 |
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:00 AM.
|
| |