| |
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
| |
| Political Threads This section is for Political Threads - Enter at your own risk. If you say you don't want to see what someone posts - don't read it :hihi: |
02-16-2013, 08:47 AM
|
#1
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Mansfield
Posts: 4,834
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by spence
. A major news outlet probably isn't going to report on it unless there's some credibility
-spence
|
Spence, I want to thank you for bringing me to tears with this beauty. You are one funny bastard 
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
|
|
|
|
|
02-16-2013, 08:55 AM
|
#2
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: RI
Posts: 21,503
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by buckman
Spence, I want to thank you for bringing me to tears with this beauty. You are one funny bastard
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Believe it or not they do have standards. Doesn't mean they don't report on some stupid stuff but an allegation with criminal reprocess ions has a very high threshold.
Hey, did you know that guy in your avatar was for gun bans? Just saying...
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
|
|
|
|
|
|
02-16-2013, 12:23 PM
|
#3
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Mansfield
Posts: 4,834
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by spence
Believe it or not they do have standards. Doesn't mean they don't report on some stupid stuff but an allegation with criminal reprocess ions has a very high threshold.
Hey, did you know that guy in your avatar was for gun bans? Just saying...
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
Hey, go look up the Gun Owners Protection Act . I believe it passed in 86'.
Your wrong but I understand
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
|
|
|
|
|
|
02-16-2013, 12:37 PM
|
#4
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: RI
Posts: 21,503
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by buckman
Hey, go look up the Gun Owners Protection Act . I believe it passed in 86'.
Your wrong but I understand
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Reagan supported the FAWB.
-spence |
|
|
|
|
|
|
02-16-2013, 01:39 PM
|
#5
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Mansfield
Posts: 4,834
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by spence
Reagan supported the FAWB.
-spence
|
No. A Democrat named Hughes sleezed in an amendment at the 11th hour banning i believe true machine guns. Reagan did take some heat for signing the bill that had this amendment attached .
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
|
|
|
|
|
|
02-16-2013, 01:49 PM
|
#6
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: RI
Posts: 21,503
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by buckman
No. A Democrat named Hughes sleezed in an amendment at the 11th hour banning i believe true machine guns. Reagan did take some heat for signing the bill that had this amendment attached .
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
You're mixing legislation. Ronald Reagan, your hero and avatar, openly supported the 1994 FAWB.
Perhaps it was just old age.
-spence |
|
|
|
|
|
|
02-16-2013, 02:07 PM
|
#7
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Mansfield
Posts: 4,834
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by spence
You're mixing legislation. Ronald Reagan, your hero and avatar, openly supported the 1994 FAWB.
Perhaps it was just old age.
-spence
|
Yes, my old age and you are correct. He did support the Brady bill
He did however have a profound impact on the 2nd amendment by appointing Scalia and Kennedy. Without them we almost lost the
2 nd amendment
Still my hero
Now back to the thread 😄
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
|
|
|
|
|
|
02-16-2013, 12:33 PM
|
#8
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Mansfield, MA
Posts: 5,238
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by spence
Believe it or not they do have standards.
|
No. They do not. Their only standards are "what panders best to our target audience" and "what furthers the agendas of our executives". Anyone who thinks differently has allowed them to pull the wool over your eyes.
There's a reason I refuse to call them "news organizations". They are nothing more than editorialized, agenda-driven sources for propaganda... all of them. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
02-16-2013, 01:48 PM
|
#9
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,444
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by spence
Believe it or not they do have standards. Doesn't mean they don't report on some stupid stuff but an allegation with criminal reprocess ions has a very high threshold.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
Tell that to the Duke lacrosse team whose lives were ruined.
Spence, what you mean to say is, there are high thresholds when the criminal is sympathetic to the liberal agenda.
You don't believe that the underage pristitute thiing is part of the investigation. Which FBI agent told you this? Or are you, as always, dismissive of that which makes your side look immoral and stupid? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
02-16-2013, 12:11 PM
|
#10
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Mansfield
Posts: 4,834
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by spence
Believe it or not they do have standards. Doesn't mean they don't report on some stupid stuff but an allegation with criminal reprocess ions has a very high threshold.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
I know a certain group of college lacrosse players that would disagree. I also remember several suicides by wrongly accused by the media, individuals.
Your blind faith does however explain a lot of your positions
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:02 AM.
|
| |
Hybrid Mode