Quote:
Originally Posted by spence
plea for more security in Libya - The Washington Post[/url]
Same old story...let's rehash a sensitive subject just to create more confusion because it suits our purpose. Defeating Clinton in 2016.
-spence
|
I don't believe anyone previously claimed to have physical evidence that the Secretary of State lied under oath. So if this wasn't talked about before, that means this is a breaking story, and thus it's not a "re-hashing" of anything...
Spence, this is not a closed case. The administration has done everything they can to thwart attempts to figure out what happened.
"it suits our purpose. Defeating Clinton in 2016."
That's one way of looking at it. Another (more accurate) way of looking at it, is that your side is desperately trying to make this go away, in order to elect Clinton in 2016.
Spence, please answer one simple question...
If it turns out there are documents signed by her that reject requests for security, do you think that's worth discussing, given that she denied that under oath?
Threaded Mode