| |
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
| |
| Political Threads This section is for Political Threads - Enter at your own risk. If you say you don't want to see what someone posts - don't read it :hihi: |
04-04-2016, 04:45 PM
|
#31
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,435
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by spence
No evidence of this Jim.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
Yes there is, and we have discussed this. There were at least 2 classified emails, flagged as classified, that made their way to her server. In order to make their way to her server, the flags had to have been removed. The intelligence in question was not generated by the State Dept, and only the agency that produced the intelligence, has the authority to remove the flag. Her defense of that, was her claim (I am trying to remember), something about the fact that what was in teh email, had been reported in the NY Times already?
Anyway, the FBI is part of the DOJ, which is headed by an OBama appointee. And they decided there was reason to spend a lot of time and manpower looking into this. They aren't doing it because Sean Hannity asked them to do it. But naturally, you know more about their procedures than anyone else... |
|
|
|
|
|
04-04-2016, 07:49 PM
|
#32
|
|
Super Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Georgetown MA
Posts: 18,189
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by spence
No evidence of this Jim.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
http://www.nationalreview.com/articl...-state-secrets
"Clinton’s flimsy claim never to have handled e-mails labeled classified imploded recently when an e-mail sent June 17, 2011, became public. That morning, Clinton’s aide Jacob Sullivan informed her that a document could not reach her via a secure fax. No sweat! Clinton replied, “ . . . turn into nonpaper w no identifying heading and send nonsecure.” So, Clinton knew about these classified markings and, even worse, instructed her staffer to cover them up and forward her that document via a fax machine vulnerable to spies. Clinton’s “gross negligence” may have violated the federal Espionage Act, 18 U.S. Code § 793."
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
"If you're arguing with an idiot, make sure he isn't doing the same thing."
|
|
|
|
|
04-04-2016, 07:54 PM
|
#33
|
|
Super Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Georgetown MA
Posts: 18,189
|
But if Hillary says she didn't do anything that should be good enough for everybody...
I mean Bill Cosby didn't do anything wrong.....it was those other 100+ women making crap up.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
04-04-2016, 09:22 PM
|
#34
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,435
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Dad Fisherman
But if Hillary says she didn't do anything that should be good enough for everybody...
I mean Bill Cosby didn't do anything wrong.....it was those other 100+ women making crap up.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
Meanwhile, thanks to you, "the narrative" just tried to commit suicide. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
04-04-2016, 09:25 PM
|
#35
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: RI
Posts: 21,231
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Dad Fisherman
http://www.nationalreview.com/articl...-state-secrets
"Clinton’s flimsy claim never to have handled e-mails labeled classified imploded recently when an e-mail sent June 17, 2011, became public. That morning, Clinton’s aide Jacob Sullivan informed her that a document could not reach her via a secure fax. No sweat! Clinton replied, “ . . . turn into nonpaper w no identifying heading and send nonsecure.” So, Clinton knew about these classified markings and, even worse, instructed her staffer to cover them up and forward her that document via a fax machine vulnerable to spies. Clinton’s “gross negligence” may have violated the federal Espionage Act, 18 U.S. Code § 793."
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
We've discussed this. The request was for unclassified talking points contained within a document on the classified system. That on its on is no indication of wrongdoing by anyone. I'd note the requested information was never even sent via email.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
Last edited by spence; 04-04-2016 at 09:41 PM..
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
04-04-2016, 10:09 PM
|
#36
|
|
time to go
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,318
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by spence
We've discussed this. The request was for unclassified talking points contained within a document on the classified system. That on its on is no indication of wrongdoing by anyone. I'd note the requested information was never even sent via email.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
She said to fax it, but you probably know better than Hillary what she said...oops I mean what she said in her email. Almost seems as though you hacked her emails also.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
|
|
|
|
|
|
04-05-2016, 10:58 AM
|
#37
|
|
Super Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Georgetown MA
Posts: 18,189
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by spence
We've discussed this. The request was for unclassified talking points contained within a document on the classified system. That on its on is no indication of wrongdoing by anyone. I'd note the requested information was never even sent via email.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
Newsflash......if it's on a classified system...it's a classified document. Until it has been OK'd for release from said system.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
"If you're arguing with an idiot, make sure he isn't doing the same thing."
|
|
|
|
|
04-05-2016, 06:52 PM
|
#38
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: RI
Posts: 21,231
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Dad Fisherman
Newsflash......if it's on a classified system...it's a classified document. Until it has been OK'd for release from said system.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
From what the State Department has said you will find unclassified information on the classified system and that doesn't mean it's illegal to talk about it.
Then again, the State Department review says the incident reported never happened regardless.
So I guess we should hold Clinton to a standard where she's liable for retroactive classification and emails that weren't even ever sent. Nice.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
Last edited by spence; 04-05-2016 at 07:02 PM..
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
04-05-2016, 07:41 PM
|
#39
|
|
Super Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Georgetown MA
Posts: 18,189
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by spence
From what the State Department has said you will find unclassified information on the classified system and that doesn't mean it's illegal to talk about it.
Then again, the State Department review says the incident reported never happened regardless.
So I guess we should hold Clinton to a standard where she's liable for retroactive classification and emails that weren't even ever sent. Nice.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
You will find unclassified on a classified system......but once it gets put on the classified system.....it is not allowed to leave without approval.....and Hillary is not the person allowed to provide that approval
I expect to hold Hillary to the same standards that everybody is held to who deals with classified material.....she's not exempt from proper security practices
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
"If you're arguing with an idiot, make sure he isn't doing the same thing."
|
|
|
|
|
04-05-2016, 07:54 PM
|
#40
|
|
Super Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Georgetown MA
Posts: 18,189
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Dad Fisherman
Newsflash......if it's on a classified system...it's a classified document. Until it has been OK'd for release from said system.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
My bad I guess.....I should have said it is "Considered" a classified document.....
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
"If you're arguing with an idiot, make sure he isn't doing the same thing."
|
|
|
|
|
04-05-2016, 08:48 PM
|
#41
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Libtardia
Posts: 21,591
|
Hillary just lost in Wisconsin. 
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
|
|
|
|
|
|
04-05-2016, 09:06 PM
|
#42
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: RI
Posts: 21,231
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Dad Fisherman
You will find unclassified on a classified system......but once it gets put on the classified system.....it is not allowed to leave without approval.....and Hillary is not the person allowed to provide that approval
|
You're contradicting yourself.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
|
|
|
|
|
|
04-06-2016, 06:33 AM
|
#43
|
|
Super Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Georgetown MA
Posts: 18,189
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by spence
You're contradicting yourself.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
No I'm not....
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
"If you're arguing with an idiot, make sure he isn't doing the same thing."
|
|
|
|
|
04-06-2016, 06:59 AM
|
#44
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Libtardia
Posts: 21,591
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Dad Fisherman
No I'm not....
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
You're not
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
|
|
|
|
|
|
04-06-2016, 09:52 AM
|
#45
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: RI
Posts: 21,231
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Dad Fisherman
My bad I guess.....I should have said it is "Considered" a classified document.....
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
My understanding is they were trying to use a secure fax to transmit unclassified talking points.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
|
|
|
|
|
|
04-06-2016, 11:06 AM
|
#46
|
|
Super Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Georgetown MA
Posts: 18,189
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by spence
My understanding is they were trying to use a secure fax to transmit unclassified talking points.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by spence
We've discussed this. The request was for unclassified talking points contained within a document on the classified system.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
Now who is contradicting themselves....or at the very least changing their story.
No such thing as non classified talking points on a classified document......if a document is labeled classified......everything with in it......including the page number......is classified
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
"If you're arguing with an idiot, make sure he isn't doing the same thing."
|
|
|
|
|
04-06-2016, 12:46 PM
|
#47
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: RI
Posts: 21,231
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Dad Fisherman
Now who is contradicting themselves....or at the very least changing their story.
No such thing as non classified talking points on a classified document......if a document is labeled classified......everything with in it......including the page number......is classified
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
I was referring to the secure fax as part of the system. There are multiple ways to transmit electronically as you're well aware.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
|
|
|
|
|
|
04-06-2016, 12:53 PM
|
#48
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: RI
Posts: 21,231
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nebe
Hillary just lost in Wisconsin.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
And Sanders picked up a massive 10 delegates. Didn't even budge the needle.
Nebe, did you see the interview Friday where Sanders couldn't even answer basic questions about how he would break up big banks...his signature policy issue?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
|
|
|
|
|
|
04-06-2016, 01:06 PM
|
#49
|
|
time to go
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,318
|
Well Sanders just said he believes gun dealers and gun manufacturers should be subject to victims of gun violence. That's going to cost him.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
04-06-2016, 02:12 PM
|
#50
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: RI
Posts: 21,231
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ecduzitgood
Well Sanders just said he believes gun dealers and gun manufacturers should be subject to victims of gun violence. That's going to cost him.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
Don't think he said that.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
|
|
|
|
|
|
04-06-2016, 02:32 PM
|
#51
|
|
Also known as OAK
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Westlery, RI
Posts: 10,369
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by spence
Don't think he said that.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
He said the opposite as I recall, that they COULD NOT be sued by the victims families, which I would agree with. |
Bryan
Originally Posted by #^&#^&#^&#^&#^&#^&#^&#^&#^&#^&#^&
"For once I agree with Spence. UGH. I just hope I don't get the urge to go start buying armani suits to wear in my shop"
|
|
|
|
|
04-08-2016, 02:37 PM
|
#52
|
|
time to go
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,318
|
http://www.newsweek.com/bernie-sande...ticisms-423228
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
I heard him say it just before I posted (4/6) that he said it but could only find this reference without digging more.
There is a 47 second clip further down the page that has Sanders speaking on this where he does say at the end that the manufacturer should be liable.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...-able-sue.html
This also wasn't what I heard him say on the 6th but it is as close as I could find.
Last edited by ecduzitgood; 04-08-2016 at 05:31 PM..
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
04-08-2016, 08:28 PM
|
#53
|
|
Super Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Middleboro MA
Posts: 17,123
|
|
The United States Constitution does not exist to grant you rights; those rights are inherent within you. Rather it exists to frame a limited government so that those natural rights can be exercised freely.
1984 was a warning, not a guidebook!
It's time more people spoke up with the truth. Every time we let a leftist lie go uncorrected, the commies get stronger.
|
|
|
|
|
04-09-2016, 07:21 AM
|
#54
|
|
time to go
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,318
|
So what's the verdict on Hillary and Bernie, do they both want the gun manufacturer liable or not for gun violence? I say they both want people to sue the gun manufacturers to try and drive them out of business.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
04-09-2016, 08:00 AM
|
#55
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Libtardia
Posts: 21,591
|
Bernie doesn't
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
04-09-2016, 10:00 AM
|
#56
|
|
time to go
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,318
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
04-09-2016, 11:00 AM
|
#58
|
|
time to go
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,318
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nebe
|
I went to the video of him speaking, I posted a link because I don't know how to get the 47 second video from the link. 28 seconds in he says they should be held liable.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
|
|
|
|
|
|
04-09-2016, 01:22 PM
|
#59
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 12,632
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ecduzitgood
I went to the video of him speaking, I posted a link because I don't know how to get the 47 second video from the link. 28 seconds in he says they should be held liable.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
he's very old and confused |
|
|
|
|
|
|
04-09-2016, 01:49 PM
|
#60
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Libtardia
Posts: 21,591
|
This might be the only time I have seen him flip flop on something.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:04 PM.
|
| |
Linear Mode
