Obama to name Ambassador Rice as National Security Advisor

[Jim in CT]

In a major coup for Islamic jihadists everywhere, Ambassador Rice will be named today as the next national security advisor. This is the woman who went on the Sunday morning talk shows after Benghazi, and stated that the Americans were killed because of the youtube video.

If Ms Rice genuinely believed, a week later, that the attack was triggered by the video, she is an incompetent idiot. If, like everyone else not in a coma, she knew by then that the video had nothing to do with it, she is a liar.

She is either a dummy or a liar. And that's our next national security advisor.

[Fishpart]

May the Lord have mercy on our souls!!

[TheSpecialist]

REally what kind of experience does she have ??? Obama is a #^&#^&#^&#^&ing joke

[Swimmer]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

In a major coup for Islamic jihadists everywhere, Ambassador Rice will be named today as the next national security advisor. This is the woman who went on the Sunday morning talk shows after Benghazi, and stated that the Americans were killed because of the youtube video.

If Ms Rice genuinely believed, a week later, that the attack was triggered by the video, she is an incompetent idiot. If, like everyone else not in a coma, she knew by then that the video had nothing to do with it, she is a liar.

She is either a dummy or a liar. And that's our next national security advisor.

Her gene pool is only puddle deep.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[spence]

Veledictorian, Stanford, Truman Scholar, Rhodes Scholar, New College Oxford, Phi Beta Kappa...god, and that's before she took a job.

The woman has probably fried more brain cells than the lot of you have functional today.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[basswipe]

Originally Posted by spence

Veledictorian, Stanford, Truman Scholar, Rhodes Scholar, New College Oxford, Phi Beta Kappa...god, and that's before she took a job.

The woman has probably fried more brain cells than the lot of you have functional today.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

So what you're saying is she has LESS brain cells than most people?Well of course except for you(elitist).

Excellent endorsement Spence.Just what we need a brain-dead person as the nsa.Think before you post dude,easily one the dumbest things you have EVER said.

[spence]

Originally Posted by basswipe

So what you're saying is she has LESS brain cells than most people?Well of course except for you(elitist).

Excellent endorsement Spence.Just what we need a brain-dead person as the nsa.Think before you post dude,easily one the dumbest things you have EVER said.

Huh? Reread...

(Hint: was a twist on the they've forgotten more than you know quip)

-spence

[detbuch]

Originally Posted by spence

Veledictorian, Stanford, Truman Scholar, Rhodes Scholar, New College Oxford, Phi Beta Kappa...god, and that's before she took a job.

The woman has probably fried more brain cells than the lot of you have functional today.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Sounds like she is ideally suited for the academic world. Of course, progressives believe that would also make one eminently qualified (if not over-qualified) for lesser jobs such as those in the political world. Especially in the progressive world ruled by elites who know what is best for the rest of us. Your list of her achievements must certainly trump mere quirks such as lying. Anyway, dissembling seems to be a preeminent attribute for executive posts as demonstrated by various current scandals. Sounds like she is a perfect fit for the Obama administration. Too bad she doesn't have some record of bombing and murder in her past. But then she would definitely be over-qualified for the position . . . would fit nicely, though, in a teaching position, say, at Columbia U.

[spence]

Originally Posted by detbuch

Sounds like she is ideally suited for the academic world. Of course, progressives believe that would also make one eminently qualified (if not over-qualified) for lesser jobs such as those in the political world. Especially in the progressive world ruled by elites who know what is best for the rest of us. Your list of her achievements must certainly trump mere quirks such as lying. Anyway, dissembling seems to be a preeminent attribute for executive posts as demonstrated by various current scandals. Sounds like she is a perfect fit for the Obama administration. Too bad she doesn't have some record of bombing and murder in her past. But then she would definitely be over-qualified for the position . . . would fit nicely, though, in a teaching position, say, at Columbia U.

As I noted, that was before she had a job. Her resume is pretty good.

As for lying...you'd think that the millions of taxpayer dollars spent trying to prove this would have by now...

-spence

[buckman]

Originally Posted by spence

As I noted, that was before she had a job. Her resume is pretty good.

As for lying...you'd think that the millions of taxpayer dollars spent trying to prove this would have by now...

-spence

Your the only one left to convince.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[justplugit]

Originally Posted by spence

As for lying...you'd think that the millions of taxpayer dollars spent trying to prove this would have by now...

-spence

Spence, if there is nothing to hide, let the Pres open all the files as to what conversations with whom were made and where he was the night of 9/11, and who gave Rice her talking points.
That wouldn't cost the taxpayers a dime.
Sure didn't have any problem getting tape and info from him the night they got Bin Laden.