|
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Political Threads This section is for Political Threads - Enter at your own risk. If you say you don't want to see what someone posts - don't read it :hihi: |
06-20-2018, 03:03 PM
|
#1
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: RI
Posts: 21,495
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
but in both cases, kids and parents were forcibly separated.
|
That's not what your article says.
|
|
|
|
06-20-2018, 03:23 PM
|
#2
|
Certifiable Intertidal Anguiologist
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Somewhere between OOB & west of Watch Hill
Posts: 35,306
|
I know - where was the coordinated outrage mob in 2013, 2014?
(BTW - I am against separating the families as I am against illegal immigration - fix immigration laws, enforce those laws, and allow more through the front door LEGALLY).
This outrage mob is the same coordinated bullet-point-knee-jerk-talking-points reaction that was the post Parkland Anti-NRA coordinated bullet-point-knee-jerk-talking-points. I wonder what August's coordinated bullet-point-knee-jerk-talking-point will be??
|
~Fix the Bait~ ~Pogies Forever~
Striped Bass Fishing - All Stripers
Kobayashi Maru Election - there is no way to win.
Apocalypse is Coming:
|
|
|
06-20-2018, 03:26 PM
|
#3
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: RI
Posts: 21,495
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnR
This outrage mob is the same coordinated bullet-point-knee-jerk-talking-points reaction that was the post Parkland Anti-NRA coordinated bullet-point-knee-jerk-talking-points. I wonder what August's coordinated bullet-point-knee-jerk-talking-point will be??
|
Yea, the Pope, Laura Bush, the entire United Methodist clergy...that mob?
|
|
|
|
06-20-2018, 05:15 PM
|
#4
|
Certifiable Intertidal Anguiologist
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Somewhere between OOB & west of Watch Hill
Posts: 35,306
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by spence
Yea, the Pope, Laura Bush, the entire United Methodist clergy...that mob?
|
No the outrage mob - but come to think of it - I don't recall them screaming when Obama era rules were doing it - not like today.
I cracked up (well would have if the topic was less horrible) watching NBC playing the religious card today.
|
~Fix the Bait~ ~Pogies Forever~
Striped Bass Fishing - All Stripers
Kobayashi Maru Election - there is no way to win.
Apocalypse is Coming:
|
|
|
06-20-2018, 05:31 PM
|
#5
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: RI
Posts: 21,495
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnR
No the outrage mob - but come to think of it - I don't recall them screaming when Obama era rules were doing it - not like today.
|
Because it wasn’t like today. Under Obama the policy wasn’t perfect but they were prioritizing deportations not weaponzing children.
Last edited by spence; 06-20-2018 at 06:34 PM..
|
|
|
|
06-21-2018, 06:11 AM
|
#6
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,441
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by spence
Because it wasn’t like today. Under Obama the policy wasn’t perfect but they were prioritizing deportations not weaponzing children.
|
The article I posted ( if you read it), says that in 2013 alone, if the 70,000 parents separated from their kids, more than 10,000 had not been accused of any crimes.
So how were they “prioritized” before being separated from their children? You are pathetically, desperately, trying to differentiate between the two.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
|
|
|
06-21-2018, 07:31 AM
|
#7
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: RI
Posts: 21,495
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
The article I posted ( if you read it), says that in 2013 alone, if the 70,000 parents separated from their kids, more than 10,000 had not been accused of any crimes.
So how were they “prioritized” before being separated from their children? You are pathetically, desperately, trying to differentiate between the two.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
"Crimes" Jim. Being in the country illegally isn't a crime. There were other criteria being used to prioritize deportations as your article describes.
|
|
|
|
06-20-2018, 05:08 PM
|
#8
|
Super Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Georgetown MA
Posts: 18,216
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by spence
That's not what your article says.
|
“Children born in the U.S. are given automatic citizenship, regardless of their parents’ immigration status, and a 2013 report by Human Impact Partners estimated that 4.5 million U.S. citizen children have at least one parent who is undocumented. When a parent is deported, their U.S.-born children sometimes leave with them. But some stay in the U.S. with another parent or family member. Some children end up in U.S. foster care.”
This......and the title of the article
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
"If you're arguing with an idiot, make sure he isn't doing the same thing."
|
|
|
06-20-2018, 05:28 PM
|
#9
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: RI
Posts: 21,495
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Dad Fisherman
“Children born in the U.S. are given automatic citizenship, regardless of their parents’ immigration status, and a 2013 report by Human Impact Partners estimated that 4.5 million U.S. citizen children have at least one parent who is undocumented. When a parent is deported, their U.S.-born children sometimes leave with them. But some stay in the U.S. with another parent or family member. Some children end up in U.S. foster care.”
This......and the title of the article
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
So what you’re saying is the kids aren’t forceable separated and the parents are given a choice? They would have time to try and place kids with family? It also notes the US Gov would help with paperwork if the parent wanted to take the child with them.
Big, huge difference.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Rate This Thread |
Hybrid Mode
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:41 AM.
|
| |