Quote:
Originally Posted by The Dad Fisherman
Again...its not Why he says no....just should he have the right to say no...
|
I think "why he says so" is crucial. If he says so because of his religion, then how does the constitution not guarantee him that right?
Courts have said that Westboro Baptist Chruch can spew their hate for one reason, and one reason only...they are doing so in the course of practicing their religion, and hurtful as it may be, the freedom of religion gives them that right.
Why doesn't the baker have as much right to practice his religion, as WBC?
Threaded Mode