|
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Political Threads This section is for Political Threads - Enter at your own risk. If you say you don't want to see what someone posts - don't read it :hihi: |
06-13-2014, 11:55 AM
|
#31
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 10,302
|
Jim - if I remember correctly Sadam was starting to give the inspectors a lot more cooperation near the end once it was obvious we were heading down the road to invasion. I don't think a little more time would have hurt anything.
I don't know if it was a honest mistake or deception but the admin. did have blinders on.
|
|
|
|
06-13-2014, 12:30 PM
|
#32
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,441
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by spence
Much of Bush's inner circle didn't want him to even go to the UN because they feared it would stop the process. They did it only for legitimacy, and abandoned it when it became clear that Hans Blix was heading towards a call of no WMD.
There certainly is debate if the US complied with international law by moving forward with the invasion.
-spence
|
(1) then a lot of other countries violated international law with us, because we were not the only ones there.
(2) if you are a stickler for sticking to international law, why do you suppose your hero rolled over like a dog when Putin seized Crimea?
Have fun with that.
|
|
|
|
06-13-2014, 12:33 PM
|
#33
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,441
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaulS
Jim - if I remember correctly Sadam was starting to give the inspectors a lot more cooperation near the end once it was obvious we were heading down the road to invasion. I don't think a little more time would have hurt anything.
I don't know if it was a honest mistake or deception but the admin. did have blinders on.
|
"if I remember correctly Sadam was starting to give the inspectors a lot more cooperation near the end "
Maybe. But he was still defiant, right up to the end. He was not giving the inspectors everything they asked for. And that was what he was required to do, under his surrender terms from the first Gulf War.
"admin. did have blinders on"
I think the administration (and a LOT of Democrats in the Senate) concluded he had WMDs. But Bush was not hell-bent on invasion, he gave Saddam too many chances to avoid it.
It wasn't deception, someone would have blown the whistle.
|
|
|
|
06-13-2014, 12:56 PM
|
#34
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: RI
Posts: 21,467
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
(1) then a lot of other countries violated international law with us, because we were not the only ones there.
(2) if you are a stickler for sticking to international law, why do you suppose your hero rolled over like a dog when Putin seized Crimea?
Have fun with that.
|
Why do you say "have fun with that" like you've made some brilliant point?
We weren't alone in 2003 but the list is pretty short.
As for Crimea, yes Russia likely broke international law. With everything, there's only so much you can do. Was Obama supposed to bomb the covert Russian troops?
-spence
|
|
|
|
06-13-2014, 12:57 PM
|
#35
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: RI
Posts: 21,467
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaulS
Jim - if I remember correctly Sadam was starting to give the inspectors a lot more cooperation near the end once it was obvious we were heading down the road to invasion. I don't think a little more time would have hurt anything.
|
Blix certainly did say that they were getting enough access to do their job...that's why he was demonized by the Right, shoot the messenger.
-spence
|
|
|
|
06-13-2014, 05:53 PM
|
#36
|
Registered Grandpa
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: east coast
Posts: 8,592
|
No need to worry. Obama is forming a commission to see what action can be taken. Great forward planning knowing this scenario could or would happen.
Another typical leading from behind move. A day late and a dollar short.
|
" Choose Life "
|
|
|
06-13-2014, 09:06 PM
|
#37
|
........
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 22,805
|
the people that are humble and good will either flee or be murdered
it's the "other's" that will overtake the country with pure evil and violence
that i was directing my comment towards... the terrorists...
i see your point tho....i'm just a stupid American with limited perspective
however.... our Government doesn't ask our citizen's permission or ask their opinions when they SPEND our TAX Dollars when out democratizing these
foreign countries ....
and granted i lean towards ISOLATIONISM completely
but it's time for change.... AMERICANS have paid their dues in blood.
i remember a Statement from one of them that said "Our sands will be littered with your arms and legs" and that has come to pass....
it all pisses me off to NO END....the tribes have been fighting one another for a thousand years and we should NOT intervene... at our own risk
|
|
|
|
06-13-2014, 09:41 PM
|
#38
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,441
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by spence
Why do you say "have fun with that" like you've made some brilliant point?
We weren't alone in 2003 but the list is pretty short.
As for Crimea, yes Russia likely broke international law. With everything, there's only so much you can do. Was Obama supposed to bomb the covert Russian troops?
-spence
|
"We weren't alone in 2003 but the list is pretty short."
Before you blindly and thoughtlessly defend your side every time, try getting some facts first. From one site, a list of 21 countries that had troops in Iraq with us. I knew of 14 off the top of my head...
http://www.globalsecurity.org/milita..._coalition.htm
"Was Obama supposed to bomb the covert Russian troops? "
I didn't hear many people at all support that. But it projects weakness when he stands there like a eunuch.
Here is what he was "supposed to do". When he campaigned, I kept hearing that because Obama (unlike Bush) was an intellectual instead of a cowboy, and because he was such a cosmopolitan and enlightened Nobel laureate, because he was pot-partisan and even post-racial (he's above such mundane things, you see) he was going to repair all the damage done by Bush and bring everyone in the world together in a collective hug. He would solve problems by making everyone love us...
|
|
|
|
06-14-2014, 05:16 AM
|
#39
|
........
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 22,805
|
OBAMA the HYPOCRITE of ALL TIME
|
|
|
|
06-14-2014, 06:43 AM
|
#40
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: RI
Posts: 21,467
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
"We weren't alone in 2003 but the list is pretty short."
Before you blindly and thoughtlessly defend your side every time, try getting some facts first. From one site, a list of 21 countries that had troops in Iraq with us. I knew of 14 off the top of my head...
httqp://www.globalsecurity.org/milit..._coalition.htm
|
I said in 2003 not 2006. I believe the invading coalition was only 5 countries not including the Kurds...
You jumpeth too fast.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
|
|
|
06-14-2014, 08:56 AM
|
#41
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Libtardia
Posts: 21,696
|
"Coalition of the willing".
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
|
|
|
06-14-2014, 09:07 AM
|
#42
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Mansfield
Posts: 4,834
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nebe
"Coalition of the willing".
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
Original phrase credited to President Clinton
Bush's....
May 14, 2004 – December 31, 2009
Country
United States (2004-2009)
United Kingdom (2004-2009)
Australia (2004-2009)
Poland (2004-2008)
Ukraine (2004-2008)
Georgia (2004-2008)
Bulgaria (2004-2008)
Denmark (2003-2007)
Italy (2004-2006)
Netherlands (2004-2005)
Spain (2003-2004)
Thailand (2003-2004)
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:50 PM.
|
| |