China tariffs - did we win?

[spence]

Originally Posted by Nebe

The only time it’s horrible is when it’s non consensual. Clinton and Lewinski were both into it...
that whole investigation was a total joke. So what if he denied it...it was no ones business but his and his wife’s. Were any laws broken ?? No.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Consensual but still highly unethical.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Nebe]

Originally Posted by spence

Consensual but still highly unethical.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Worthy of impeachment ??? Doubtful.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by spence

Consensual but still highly unethical.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

the ability for an intern to give consent to the president, is debatable. so you think teachers should
be able to get involved with students, if the student is above the
minimum age of consent? the difference in authority, doesn’t effect the ability to give consent? i guess you’re not into the whole me too movement then, most were above the age of consent.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[spence]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

the ability for an intern to give consent to the president, is debatable. so you think teachers should
be able to get involved with students, if the student is above the
minimum age of consent? the difference in authority, doesn’t effect the ability to give consent? i guess you’re not into the whole me too movement then, most were above the age of consent.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

I think you’re confusing current CT law with Federal law, and also consider attitudes towards this stuff are a lot different now versus 1995.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[scottw]

Originally Posted by spence

and also consider attitudes towards this stuff are a lot different now versus 1995.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

for some .....

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by spence

I think you’re confusing current CT law with Federal law, and also consider attitudes towards this stuff are a lot different now versus 1995.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

nice dodge. i asked you what you think. don’t want to share? Many states, in addition to CT, make it illegal for students to get involved with teachers.

Again, afraid to tell us what you think?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[spence]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

nice dodge. i asked you what you think. don’t want to share? Many states, in addition to CT, make it illegal for students to get involved with teachers.

Again, afraid to tell us what you think?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Apples and oranges. With teachers you have the potential for a power imbalance but also for the student to use sex to get preferential treatment. I’m not sure it needs to be illegal if the ages of consent are within range but it’s still unethical and should carry a penalty.

If everyone is an adult the situation is a bit different but certainly carries clear ethics and moral risks.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by spence

Apples and oranges. With teachers you have the potential for a power imbalance but also for the student to use sex to get preferential treatment. I’m not sure it needs to be illegal if the ages of consent are within range but it’s still unethical and should carry a penalty.

If everyone is an adult the situation is a bit different but certainly carries clear ethics and moral risks.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

so you’re saying that imbalance cannot exist in a professional relationship between adults. no matter how far apart the difference in position?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[scottw]

Originally Posted by spence

Apples and oranges. With teachers you have the potential for a power imbalance but also for the student to use sex to get preferential treatment. I’m not sure it needs to be illegal if the ages of consent are within range but it’s still unethical and should carry a penalty.

If everyone is an adult the situation is a bit different but certainly carries clear ethics and moral risks.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

With Presidents you have the potential for a power imbalance but also for the intern to use sex to get preferential treatment. I’m not sure it needs to be illegal if the ages of consent are within range but it’s still unethical and should carry a penalty.


BTW he wasn't impeached by the house for sexual relations with monica so i don't know why you keep beating the dead horse

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by scottw

With Presidents you have the potential for a power imbalance but also for the intern to use sex to get preferential treatment. I’m not sure it needs to be illegal if the ages of consent are within range but it’s still unethical and should carry a penalty.


BTW he wasn't impeached by the house for sexual relations with monica so i don't know why you keep beating the dead horse

they beat that horse, even though it’s bullish•t, because it sounds better than admittimg th e truth, that he was impeached for lying under oath.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device