|
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Political Threads This section is for Political Threads - Enter at your own risk. If you say you don't want to see what someone posts - don't read it :hihi: |
01-12-2019, 09:21 AM
|
#1
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Somerset MA
Posts: 9,407
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
I love it when you and Spence say "wrong", as if just saying it makes it so, with zero support. In both cases, bigots were using religion to disqualify someone from a position. True or false?
You reflexively disagree with anything that makes liberalism look bad, you can't explain why, because you don't know why.
|
you need to do more reading ,before you try to square your circles
you cant even understand the difference between a vote to remove some because of their religion
Or a question about someone religious teachings and background and if these things will influence their sentencing if the law goes against these teachings (death penalty) asked by a fellow catholic .... seeing the question arise from a written in a paper written by the person being asked the question
20 years earlier ?
Last edited by wdmso; 01-12-2019 at 09:26 AM..
|
|
|
|
01-12-2019, 09:45 AM
|
#2
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,441
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by wdmso
you need to do more reading ,before you try to square your circles
you cant even understand the difference between a vote to remove some because of their religion
Or a question about someone religious teachings and background and if these things will influence their sentencing if the law goes against these teachings (death penalty) asked by a fellow catholic .... seeing the question arise from a written in a paper written by the person being asked the question
20 years earlier ?
|
the senators feel his religion disqualified him. that’s bigotry.
if it’s ok for a judge to have a conscience formed by listening to Ivy League professors, or by watching MSNBC, then it’s ok for a conscience to be informed by religion.
my moral compass isn’t inferior to anyone else’s, just because it’s partly based on Christianity.
if ginsberg retires while trump is in there, he’s probably going to pick Amy Barrett, a woman who is a devout catholic. that will be a problem for the bigots in the senate, attacking a woman. it would be fascinating to watch.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
|
|
|
01-12-2019, 11:25 AM
|
#3
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Somerset MA
Posts: 9,407
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
the senators feel his religion disqualified him. that’s bigotry.
if it’s ok for a judge to have a conscience formed by listening to Ivy League professors, or by watching MSNBC, then it’s ok for a conscience to be informed by religion.
my moral compass isn’t inferior to anyone else’s, just because it’s partly based on Christianity.
if ginsberg retires while trump is in there, he’s probably going to pick Amy Barrett, a woman who is a devout catholic. that will be a problem for the bigots in the senate, attacking a woman. it would be fascinating to watch.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
and where did the senators explicitly state that Her being catholic disqualified Her ?? ...
|
|
|
|
01-12-2019, 11:30 AM
|
#4
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: RI
Posts: 21,483
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by wdmso
and where did the senators explicitly state that Her being catholic disqualified Her ?? ...
|
They didn’t.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
|
|
|
01-12-2019, 12:13 PM
|
#5
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,441
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by spence
They didn’t.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
the hell they didn’t.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
|
|
|
01-12-2019, 02:15 PM
|
#6
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: RI
Posts: 21,483
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
the hell they didn’t.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
No they really didn’t.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
|
|
|
01-13-2019, 10:16 AM
|
#7
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,441
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by spence
No they really didn’t.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
well, when you make THAT compelling a case, how can I attempt to rebut?
The best you can do is say "no".
|
|
|
|
01-12-2019, 12:16 PM
|
#8
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,441
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by spence
They didn’t.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
but keep in mind, feinstein has no issue with sonya sotomayor
saying that hispanic females
make better judges than white men. but being a catholic, can’t have that .
https://www.nationalreview.com/corne...icial-nominee/
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
|
|
|
01-12-2019, 12:12 PM
|
#9
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,441
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by wdmso
and where did the senators explicitly state that Her being catholic disqualified Her ?? ...
|
when barrett was nominated for
an appeals court
position, the sente democrats grilled her about her catholicism. one of them ( feinstein?) said “ the dogma is loud in you.
should
gop senators ask judicial nominees if they watch msnbc or cnn?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:35 AM.
|
| |