senate democrats support infanticide?

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by PaulS

Your last statement just confirms the hatred you feel towards Dems.

Not hatred, just astonishment at their willingness to embrace what's wicked and sick.

You also completely dodged my question Paul. I'll ask one more time.

If a mom wants a late-term abortion, but the baby somehow survives, and is born hurt but robust enough to be viable, AFTER THE BABY IS BORN, should the mother still have the right to kill the baby?

Can you answer the question as it's asked, please?

[detbuch]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

Not hatred, just astonishment at their willingness to embrace what's wicked and sick.

You also completely dodged my question Paul. I'll ask one more time.

If a mom wants a late-term abortion, but the baby somehow survives, and is born hurt but robust enough to be viable, AFTER THE BABY IS BORN, should the mother still have the right to kill the baby?

Can you answer the question as it's asked, please?

The Dems insist that anyone born in the U.S. is a citizen and must be accorded all the rights (including "to life") and privileges of a U.S. citizen.

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

Not hatred, just astonishment at their willingness to embrace what's wicked and sick.

You also completely dodged my question Paul. I'll ask one more time.

If a mom wants a late-term abortion, but the baby somehow survives, and is born hurt but robust enough to be viable, AFTER THE BABY IS BORN, should the mother still have the right to kill the baby?

Can you answer the question as it's asked, please?

So, they actively kill the baby? With what - a needle, hand over its mouth, bang it's head against the wall? And can they do it just because the mom doesn't want the baby?

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by PaulS

So, they actively kill the baby? With what - a needle, hand over its mouth, bang it's head against the wall? And can they do it just because the mom doesn't want the baby?

You are usually a lot more honest than this...

Are you ok if they actively kill the baby, say with a needle of poison?

Or you OK if they kill the baby by leaving it alone to whither and die?

Are you OK with either scenario, if the baby is born and the mom doesn't want it? Because the proposed bill would have prevented that. And the democrats blocked that bill.

Looks like you are stalling to avoid a direct answer. You didn't offer your opinion on the scenarios you articulated.

"When you own this site you can demand that people answer your questions."

I'm not demanding anything. I'm pointing out that you are dodging, yet you found time to insult me on this thread, and to insult Dangles on the other thread.

"Does anyone else on this site start threads with the insults you post? Wouldn't you call that a hate monger? "

I'll show you a courtesy you refuse to show me, and I'll answer directly.

In this case, I don't feel it's an insult to say Democrats support infanticide. I think it's an accurate description of their actions. And no, I don't think that accurately summarizing their actions, makes me a hatemonger. I have many friends who are liberal democrats, and I love them. I just can't fathom how they can support such things.

"I believe that you said your parents where Democrats - are they the satanic folks you always complain about "

Again, I will show you the courtesy you choose not to show me, and I will answer. My parents are "FDR Democrats", who cling to what the democratic party was then, and can't accept what it has become. My parents are staunchly pro-life. A fair question, though.

I don't consider my parents to be satanic. I consider the democrats in the US Senate who actively blocked a bill requiring care for infants born alive, to be satanic. Maybe that's a slight exaggeration, but not much of a leap.

For f*ck's sake, we're talking about babies outside the womb. And you can't admit they are human beings, and that their lives are precious?

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

For f*ck's sake, we're talking about babies outside the womb. And you can't admit they are human beings, and that their lives are precious?

They are severely handicapped and it is an extremely small % - less than 0.5%. Horrible situations

The Repubs are just using this for political purposes.

Love the fetus, hate the baby and could care less about it after birth. That is the Repub. position for anyone who needs financial help (the "takers" vs the "makers").

I always said for anyone who has an abortion bc part of the reason is financial, that is on the Repubs.

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by PaulS

They are severely handicapped and it is an extremely small % - less than 0.5%. Horrible situations

The Repubs are just using this for political purposes.

Love the fetus, hate the baby and could care less about it after birth. That is the Repub. position for anyone who needs financial help (the "takers" vs the "makers").

I always said for anyone who has an abortion bc part of the reason is financial, that is on the Repubs.

What will it take, exactly, for you to answer the question??

Are you OK, or are you not OK, with a law requiring doctors to care for babies born alive, at least the ones who are viable?

"They are severely handicapped "

First, that' snot always true. I saw a late-term abortion survivor on TV last night, she is fairly healthy. If at birth, the mom told the doctor to just let her starve to death, or to actively kill her, does the mom have that right? Yes or no?

Second, are we at the point where we exterminate the handicapped now? And MY SIDE are the Nazis?

"The Repubs are just using this for political purposes."

Possibly. If so, it worked. The democrats happily walked right into the trap.

"Love the fetus, hate the baby "

Great bumper sticker. Bullsh*t as a persuasive argument, because there's zero evidence it's true. Z-E-R-O. You are way too smart for that nonsense. I want a BETTER safety net for those who need it. I'd pay for it, by getting rid of stupid waste, of which there's plenty, and if you live in CT, you know that.

"That is the Repub. position for anyone who needs financial help"

Please provide some evidence to support that nonsense.

Bill Clinton kicked millions of deadbeats off welfare, and it worked. They all went back to work. Was he a Republican who hated poor people?

"I always said for anyone who has an abortion bc part of the reason is financial, that is on the Repubs"

And every time you said it, you were wrong.