Quote:
Originally Posted by detbuch
You might ask Spence if he believes that anyone born in the U.S. is automatically a U.S. citizen, and if a U.S. citizen should be left to die because its mother says so.
|
Spence will say we took it all out of context or some such gibberish. But if liberals believe it, and presumably they do, he will tell you it's brilliant.
Paul is more thoughtful and responsive, but he's avoiding this too.
Carrying a baby with significant defects and you are told the baby will only survive minutes, is one thing. Liberals make it sound like it's the only thing. It's not. I posted a link to an interview with a woman who survived a late term abortion, she is a healthy beautiful adult woman now. So
some babies who survive late term abortion, are viable.
The GOP law would require that those babies be cared for. The Senate democrats blocked it.
Can I assume that means, that if a baby survives a late term abortion and is viable, which we
know happens, is it acceptable to just let that baby die?
They won't answer. I assume they won't answer because the answer to my question is "yes", and they can't admit it or try to defend it, because it's indefensible. But it's precisely where that party is headed, because all they care about, is differentiating themselves from Trump as much as possible, no matter how bizarre or ugly the space is where they go. Whatever Trump says he believes, they reflexively claim that the noble belief is whatever belief is as far away from Trump's position as humanly possible, in the left direction.
Trump says babies are, in general, a good thing? The hell they are! Let's celebrate late term abortions for any reason! Let's block bills that say we have to care for babies after they are born! Let's have our new leader, Alexandria Cortez, say that young people should question if it's moral to have babies!
Radical Trump opposition is an instinctive reflex for them at this point, there's zero thought behind it, they probably don't even know they're doing it.
Threaded Mode