Durham’s probe into Russian investigation now a criminal investigation

[scottw]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

Neither Durham nor the IG have released their findings, but somehow you and WDMSO and Spence already know that it's a sham.

they got the same marching orders

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by scottw

they got the same marching orders

Right, they're regurgitating Chris Hayes and Rachael Maddow. No facts.

[wdmso]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

Right, they're regurgitating Chris Hayes and Rachael Maddow. No facts.

To bad like most of your conspiracys wrong again.. but keep thinking thats what people push back against your conclusions do.. its your easy button

As for predictable responses yes mine are predictable and very consistent .. they are always in response to yours or othrt conspiracy driven suggestions of whats truth and whats not.

You really need to see beyound and thru your victimization of Trump

Because with out doubt if you replaced Obama for Trump or Erich holder for Barr or Clinton for Pompeo

With the facts as they are to day. The trascipts the audio having a private lawer doing governments business

Your tune would be so very diffrent.. why would that be the case? Facts should be facts that is unless your just a partisan hack or just hypocritically . And clearly your both
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by wdmso

Facts should be facts that is unless your just a partisan hack or just hypocritically . And clearly your both
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

I'm the one waiting for facts. You're the one who was 100% ignorant of the details of the investigation, yet somehow already concluded that it was a conspiracy-laden sham.

But you're the one who gets the facts first? And I'm the one who jumps to politically motivated conclusions? Not even you believe that. Tell us some major policy items on which you vehemently disagree with democrats. I'll just wait patiently.

[wdmso]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

I'm the one waiting for facts. You're the one who was 100% ignorant of the details of the investigation, yet somehow already concluded that it was a conspiracy-laden sham.

But you're the one who gets the facts first? And I'm the one who jumps to politically motivated conclusions? Not even you believe that. Tell us some major policy items on which you vehemently disagree with democrats. I'll just wait patiently.

Glad you dodged the 1st part of my response.. lol
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device