Striper Talk Striped Bass Fishing, Surfcasting, Boating

     

Left Nav S-B Home FAQ Members List S-B on Facebook Arcade WEAX Tides Buoys Calendar Today's Posts Right Nav

Left Container Right Container
 

Go Back   Striper Talk Striped Bass Fishing, Surfcasting, Boating » Striper Chat - Discuss stuff other than fishing ~ The Scuppers and Political talk » Political Threads

Political Threads This section is for Political Threads - Enter at your own risk. If you say you don't want to see what someone posts - don't read it :hihi:

 
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 10-05-2021, 03:20 PM   #1
spence
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
spence's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: RI
Posts: 21,483
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT View Post
Harvard touted her widely as their first Native American law professor.
I believe she was listed once in a diversity report but not by name.

Quote:
She exploited the genuine suffering of your people, in order to land a $400,000-a-year-job.
The two people at Harvard who recommended her for the job said they had no idea she thought she was a Native American and she was hired solely on her professional qualifications.

Quote:
She excoriated banks for foreclosing. Yet she and her husband bought and flipped foreclosures. So it's only OK when she does it.
She didn't flip a single foreclosure Jim.

Quote:
Then there's her whopper about getting fired form a school job for being pregnant (poor little lamb, so victimized by the evil men), when there's paperwork that she quit and the school board asked her to stay.
I looked into this one, seems like it's based off some school meeting minutes that were months before she would have been visible pregnant. Certainly doesn't invalidate her story.

Quote:
Me think-um she want to dwell in house of Great White Chief. Ugh.
Pathetic.
spence is offline  
Old 10-05-2021, 04:42 PM   #2
Jim in CT
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,441
Quote:
Originally Posted by spence View Post
I believe she was listed once in a diversity report but not by name.


The two people at Harvard who recommended her for the job said they had no idea she thought she was a Native American and she was hired solely on her professional qualifications.


She didn't flip a single foreclosure Jim.


I looked into this one, seems like it's based off some school meeting minutes that were months before she would have been visible pregnant. Certainly doesn't invalidate her story.


Pathetic.
"I believe she was listed once in a diversity report but not by name."

Of course you believe that, because it paints her actions favorably. WHat I believe, because it's true, is that Harvard did mention her by name to show the diversity of lhe law school faculty. From the Crimson Tide article below...

"Although the conventional wisdom among students and faculty is that the Law School faculty includes no minority women, Chmura said Professor of Law Elizabeth Warren is Native American."


https://www.thecrimson.com/article/1...ing-at-hls-pa/

"The two people at Harvard who recommended her for the job said they had no idea she thought she was a Native American"

You say they said. You also said they didn't mention her by name, so...

"She didn't flip a single foreclosure Jim. "

Yahoo, among others, says otherwise. I dare say you might want to re-think where you get your "news".

https://news.yahoo.com/news/harsh-fo...ycsrp_catchall

"I looked into this one, seems like it's based off some school meeting minutes that were months before she would have been visible pregnant. Certainly doesn't invalidate her story. "

Which took place "months before she was visibly pregnant"? If she quit before she was visibly pregnant, how could they have fired her for being pregnant?

Again, your sources of "news" are a tad askew.
Jim in CT is offline  
Old 10-06-2021, 06:38 AM   #3
scottw
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
scottw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 12,632
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT View Post

"I believe she was listed once in a diversity report but not by name."

Of course you believe that, because it paints her actions favorably. WHat I believe, because it's true, is that Harvard did mention her by name to show the diversity of lhe law school faculty. From the Crimson Tide article below...

"Although the conventional wisdom among students and faculty is that the Law School faculty includes no minority women, Chmura said Professor of Law Elizabeth Warren is Native American."


.
when was she at Harvard?...didn't she write POW WOW CHOW in 1984?

this is bidenesque...

Elizabeth Warren's Pow Wow Chow 'Cherokee' recipes were word for word COPIES of famous FRENCH chef's techniques
By DAILY MAIL REPORTER
PUBLISHED: 20:31 EDT, 18 May 2012
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	EG2_YXvX4AEwehj.jpeg
Views:	129
Size:	24.8 KB
ID:	68395  
scottw is offline  
Old 10-06-2021, 06:43 AM   #4
scottw
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
scottw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 12,632
^^^ so much cultural appropriation going on there....


stole the french chef's recipe to make the mexican soup claiming she's native american....good grief
scottw is offline  
Old 10-06-2021, 07:35 AM   #5
Jim in CT
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,441
Quote:
Originally Posted by scottw View Post
^^^ so much cultural appropriation going on there....


stole the french chef's recipe to make the mexican soup claiming she's native american....good grief
Warren just reeks of sincerity.
Jim in CT is offline  
Old 10-06-2021, 12:48 PM   #6
spence
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
spence's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: RI
Posts: 21,483
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT View Post
You say they said. You also said they didn't mention her by name, so...
The report didn't, you're citing an interview with a small school paper, not exactly widespread promotion.

Quote:
Yahoo, among others, says otherwise. I dare say you might want to re-think where you get your "news".

https://news.yahoo.com/news/harsh-fo...ycsrp_catchall
This isn't Yahoo, it's a hit piece by a writer that works for Glenn Beck.

WaPo did a breakdown of every house she or her husband bought or sold. There were 4 foreclosures and all we're held for more than six months. Buying homes on the open market for her family to remodel isn't exactly a nefarious act and she was criticizing banks for ILLEGAL FORECLOSURES.

Quote:
Which took place "months before she was visibly pregnant"? If she quit before she was visibly pregnant, how could they have fired her for being pregnant?
It looks like they offered to continue her contract before they knew she was pregnant.
spence is offline  
Old 10-06-2021, 12:52 PM   #7
Jim in CT
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,441
Quote:
Originally Posted by spence View Post
The report didn't, you're citing an interview with a small school paper, not exactly widespread promotion.


This isn't Yahoo, it's a hit piece by a writer that works for Glenn Beck.

WaPo did a breakdown of every house she or her husband bought or sold. There were 4 foreclosures and all we're held for more than six months. Buying homes on the open market for her family to remodel isn't exactly a nefarious act and not what she was criticizing banks for.


It looks like they offered to continue her contract before they knew she was pregnant.
oh, so it’s ok to profit on foreclosures, as long as you hold them for 6 months!!! Of course!

Spence, you are precious. She said it was predatory for banks to foreclose in search of improving their bottom line. But of course, it’s not hypocritical for her to profit from it. and it’s wrong for
banks to profit from student loans, but ok if those loans paid her $400,000 salary.

It all depends on whose ox is getting gored.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
Jim in CT is offline  
Old 10-06-2021, 02:03 PM   #8
spence
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
spence's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: RI
Posts: 21,483
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT View Post
oh, so it’s ok to profit on foreclosures, as long as you hold them for 6 months!!! Of course!
That's not what I said but if you're holding onto property foreclosure or not it's not really flipping.

Quote:
Spence, you are precious. She said it was predatory for banks to foreclose in search of improving their bottom line. But of course, it’s not hypocritical for her to profit from it. and it’s wrong for
banks to profit from student loans, but ok if those loans paid her $400,000 salary.
If you can't tell the difference between legal and illegal activity I'm not sure I can help you.
spence is offline  
Old 10-06-2021, 02:24 PM   #9
detbuch
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 7,725
Quote:
Originally Posted by spence View Post
That's not what I said but if you're holding onto property foreclosure or not it's not really flipping.


If you can't tell the difference between legal and illegal activity I'm not sure I can help you.
A lot of folks can't tell the difference between legal and illegal immigration.
detbuch is offline  
Old 10-06-2021, 02:40 PM   #10
Jim in CT
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,441
Quote:
Originally Posted by spence View Post
That's not what I said but if you're holding onto property foreclosure or not it's not really flipping.


If you can't tell the difference between legal and illegal activity I'm not sure I can help you.
the banks who foreclosed also didn’t break laws.

i never said what warred did was illegal. i said she’s a hypocrite, it a criminal.

If i clearly say hypocrite, and you hear criminal, I’m not sure I can help you.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
Jim in CT is offline  
 

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:44 AM.


Powered by vBulletin. Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Please use all necessary and proper safety precautions. STAY SAFE Striper Talk Forums
Copyright 1998-20012 Striped-Bass.com