Bidens SCOTUS pick

[wdmso]

the Truth that's Funny Here a Truth she's done More Judging from the Bench then the last 3 appointments put together.


Ted cruz I think you’re the — the only Supreme Court nominee in history who’s been unable to answer the question, what is a woman.? Guess what no Justice has ever been asked that question

Jackson told Cruz: “So, senator, I know that I’m a woman. I know that Senator Blackburn is a woman and the woman who I admire most in the world is in the room today, my mother.”




Jim all you do is parrot what you have been fed ... here is a fact check link, I am sure you insist it's not factual because it is part of the Fake Media https://apnews.com/article/abortion-...9e3d1f8e644d25


Then, most importantly, we learn that she had ruled the pro life groups could not rally in front of abortion clinics. She ruled that the First Amendment does not apply to pro life Americans. She's on record as having ignored the constitution in favor of political outcomes she personally wants. That's the worst possible kind of judge. This is exactly why the statue of Lady Justice at every courthouse, has a blindfold. Judges have to be able to set aside their personal political agenda, and abide only by what the constitution says. This isn't a judge, she's a liberal activist.

everything thing you wrote is a Lie! She was Not a Judge she made no rulings she did not rule against the 1st amendment she did not ignore the constitution favor of political outcomes she personally wants.

Not sure why you never doing any research ?

Here is what actually happened


The brief, which Jackson co-signed as a young attorney in a law firm, did not refer to all anti-abortion women as “hostile” and “noisy” but was making a legal argument on behalf of a client in regards to protesters outside abortion clinics.

you claim Truth then you post a lie... she did not rule on this as a judge Did she !


Jim dont forget Jackson used her “time and talent not to serve our nation’s veterans or other vulnerable groups, but to provide free legal services to help terrorists get out of Gitmo and go back to the fight.” this statement was from Blackburn

Funny she was ask something similar in 2021 when she was CONFIRMED U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit


Jackson, 2021 responses to Senate questions: Under the ethics rules that apply to lawyers, an attorney has a duty to represent her clients zealously, which includes refraining from contradicting her client’s legal arguments and/or undermining her client’s interests by publicly declaring the lawyer’s own personal disagreement with the legal position or alleged behavior of her client. Because these standards apply even after termination of the representation, it would be inappropriate for me to comment on whether I disagreed with Khi Ali Gul, found his alleged crimes offensive, or considered resigning my position as an Assistant Federal Public Defender based on any such disagreement or offense.

she did what all Lawyers do formulated a case in their clients best interest and the law and order party is Outrage ... funny how that works.



Yet child pornography, And Transgender over and over that's the Truth that drives these hearing , it's a perversion that motivates the Republican Base and reinforces their Fantasy of Baby eating cabal " democrats" or Being raped by a Transgender person in the bathroom, dont forget the Mexican rapist or all the afghan rapist that the Biden flew into the country...

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by wdmso

the Truth that's Funny Here a Truth she's done More Judging from the Bench then the last 3 appointments put together.


Ted cruz I think you’re the — the only Supreme Court nominee in history who’s been unable to answer the question, what is a woman.? Guess what no Justice has ever been asked that question

Jackson told Cruz: “So, senator, I know that I’m a woman. I know that Senator Blackburn is a woman and the woman who I admire most in the world is in the room today, my mother.”




Jim all you do is parrot what you have been fed ... here is a fact check link, I am sure you insist it's not factual because it is part of the Fake Media https://apnews.com/article/abortion-...9e3d1f8e644d25


Then, most importantly, we learn that she had ruled the pro life groups could not rally in front of abortion clinics. She ruled that the First Amendment does not apply to pro life Americans. She's on record as having ignored the constitution in favor of political outcomes she personally wants. That's the worst possible kind of judge. This is exactly why the statue of Lady Justice at every courthouse, has a blindfold. Judges have to be able to set aside their personal political agenda, and abide only by what the constitution says. This isn't a judge, she's a liberal activist.

everything thing you wrote is a Lie! She was Not a Judge she made no rulings she did not rule against the 1st amendment she did not ignore the constitution favor of political outcomes she personally wants.

Not sure why you never doing any research ?

Here is what actually happened


The brief, which Jackson co-signed as a young attorney in a law firm, did not refer to all anti-abortion women as “hostile” and “noisy” but was making a legal argument on behalf of a client in regards to protesters outside abortion clinics.

you claim Truth then you post a lie... she did not rule on this as a judge Did she !


Jim dont forget Jackson used her “time and talent not to serve our nation’s veterans or other vulnerable groups, but to provide free legal services to help terrorists get out of Gitmo and go back to the fight.” this statement was from Blackburn

Funny she was ask something similar in 2021 when she was CONFIRMED U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit


Jackson, 2021 responses to Senate questions: Under the ethics rules that apply to lawyers, an attorney has a duty to represent her clients zealously, which includes refraining from contradicting her client’s legal arguments and/or undermining her client’s interests by publicly declaring the lawyer’s own personal disagreement with the legal position or alleged behavior of her client. Because these standards apply even after termination of the representation, it would be inappropriate for me to comment on whether I disagreed with Khi Ali Gul, found his alleged crimes offensive, or considered resigning my position as an Assistant Federal Public Defender based on any such disagreement or offense.

she did what all Lawyers do formulated a case in their clients best interest and the law and order party is Outrage ... funny how that works.



Yet child pornography, And Transgender over and over that's the Truth that drives these hearing , it's a perversion that motivates the Republican Base and reinforces their Fantasy of Baby eating cabal " democrats" or Being raped by a Transgender person in the bathroom, dont forget the Mexican rapist or all the afghan rapist that the Biden flew into the country...

"she's done More Judging from the Bench then the last 3 appointments put together."

I know. That's one reason why I was excited.

But quantity doesn't necessarily mean quality.

It doesn't concern you that she'd ignore the constitution to rule in a way that aligns with her politics? Do you disagree that judges aren't supposed to root for one side or the other, but are only supposed to be guided by the constitution?

Why would any conservative ever feel like she'd give them a fair hearing?

"what is a woman.? Guess what no Justice has ever been asked that question"

Because as a society, we've never been so stupid as to not collectively agree on the answer. If you think that question is harsh or unfair, maybe you were asleep during the Kavanaugh and Clarence Thomas confirmation hearings. This is nothing.

"Jim all you do is parrot what you have been feed"

Let's end with that comment. I have constantly bashed republicans here. And I have said a million times I was pro gay marriage when Obama and Hilary were adamantly opposed to it, I am opposed to the death penalty, I think every American has a right to good health coverage that covers pre existing conditions, and I think we need more effective gun control.

I have 2 questions for you, and I dare you to answer...

(1) who "fed" me my opinions on those issues?

(2) please share with us, some big issues on which you think democrats are 100% wrong.

Let's see which one of us can think for himself, and which one of us can only repeat what we have been fed? Show us all I'm wrong, list some big issues on which you agree with Republicans?

You're the thoughtless ideologue here, not me.

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by wdmso

the Truth that's Funny Here a Truth she's done More Judging from the Bench then the last 3 appointments put together.


Ted cruz I think you’re the — the only Supreme Court nominee in history who’s been unable to answer the question, what is a woman.? Guess what no Justice has ever been asked that question

Jackson told Cruz: “So, senator, I know that I’m a woman. I know that Senator Blackburn is a woman and the woman who I admire most in the world is in the room today, my mother.”




Jim all you do is parrot what you have been fed ... here is a fact check link, I am sure you insist it's not factual because it is part of the Fake Media https://apnews.com/article/abortion-...9e3d1f8e644d25


Then, most importantly, we learn that she had ruled the pro life groups could not rally in front of abortion clinics. She ruled that the First Amendment does not apply to pro life Americans. She's on record as having ignored the constitution in favor of political outcomes she personally wants. That's the worst possible kind of judge. This is exactly why the statue of Lady Justice at every courthouse, has a blindfold. Judges have to be able to set aside their personal political agenda, and abide only by what the constitution says. This isn't a judge, she's a liberal activist.

everything thing you wrote is a Lie! She was Not a Judge she made no rulings she did not rule against the 1st amendment she did not ignore the constitution favor of political outcomes she personally wants.

Not sure why you never doing any research ?

Here is what actually happened


The brief, which Jackson co-signed as a young attorney in a law firm, did not refer to all anti-abortion women as “hostile” and “noisy” but was making a legal argument on behalf of a client in regards to protesters outside abortion clinics.

you claim Truth then you post a lie... she did not rule on this as a judge Did she !


Jim dont forget Jackson used her “time and talent not to serve our nation’s veterans or other vulnerable groups, but to provide free legal services to help terrorists get out of Gitmo and go back to the fight.” this statement was from Blackburn

Funny she was ask something similar in 2021 when she was CONFIRMED U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit


Jackson, 2021 responses to Senate questions: Under the ethics rules that apply to lawyers, an attorney has a duty to represent her clients zealously, which includes refraining from contradicting her client’s legal arguments and/or undermining her client’s interests by publicly declaring the lawyer’s own personal disagreement with the legal position or alleged behavior of her client. Because these standards apply even after termination of the representation, it would be inappropriate for me to comment on whether I disagreed with Khi Ali Gul, found his alleged crimes offensive, or considered resigning my position as an Assistant Federal Public Defender based on any such disagreement or offense.

she did what all Lawyers do formulated a case in their clients best interest and the law and order party is Outrage ... funny how that works.



Yet child pornography, And Transgender over and over that's the Truth that drives these hearing , it's a perversion that motivates the Republican Base and reinforces their Fantasy of Baby eating cabal " democrats" or Being raped by a Transgender person in the bathroom, dont forget the Mexican rapist or all the afghan rapist that the Biden flew into the country...

"The brief, which Jackson co-signed as a young attorney in a law firm, did not refer to all anti-abortion women as “hostile” and “noisy” but was making a legal argument on behalf of a client in regards to protesters outside abortion clinics.

She wasn't a judge, you are right. She was arguing on behalf of a client as a lawyer. Not sure her "young-ness" matters, nit sure why you put that in there. Has she changed her mind on the issue Wayne?

[wdmso]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

"The brief, which Jackson co-signed as a young attorney in a law firm, did not refer to all anti-abortion women as “hostile” and “noisy” but was making a legal argument on behalf of a client in regards to protesters outside abortion clinics.

She wasn't a judge, you are right. She was arguing on behalf of a client as a lawyer. Not sure her "young-ness" matters, nit sure why you put that in there. Has she changed her mind on the issue Wayne?

Jim I am glad your not my lawyer

Clearly you fail to understand a lawyer responsibilities to their clients

Or how you twist these briefs presented on the behalf of the client

As somehow become Her personal believes?

Do you condemn alan Dershowitz for his defense of oj simpson or helped sex offender Jeffrey Epstein get a plea deal.

By defending them he suddenly believes in murder or is good with sex with under aged girls

Or do you skip over all that to champion him when he supports your position or joining Donald Trump’s impeachment legal ..
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by wdmso

Jim I am glad your not my lawyer

Clearly you fail to understand a lawyer responsibilities to their clients

Or how you twist these briefs presented on the behalf of the client

As somehow become Her personal believes?

Do you condemn alan Dershowitz for his defense of oj simpson or helped sex offender Jeffrey Epstein get a plea deal.

By defending them he suddenly believes in murder or is good with sex with under aged girls

Or do you skip over all that to champion him when he supports your position or joining Donald Trump’s impeachment legal ..
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

waiting for you to list the issues on which you think democrats are wrong?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device