Quote:
Originally Posted by PaulS
It was a transcript (just looked it up) of I think his radio show.
I'm just wondering what he meant.
"Well, KBJ - Ketanji Brown Jackson - is what your country looks like on critical race theory."
|
You left out a very significant part of his statement...
I looked up the transcript. He's saying she's not that bright and not that honest (she says only a biologist can define what a woman is, and in my opinion you have to be both stupid and cowardly to be able to say that out loud), and that someone like that could be about to spend decades on our supreme court, combined with the fact that Biden announced years ago that his nominee would be a black woman...and I get where he's coming from.
How can she, for example, ever hear a case about Title IX or gender discrimination, if she has no idea what a woman is?
I'd agree she's precisely what you get (so is Kamala Harris) when the current federal government insists on seeing everything through the prism of race, and insisting that everyone be a radical liberal. You're eliminating a of of truly qualified people, including truly qualified democrats. That's why I think it's a good idea to ignore gender and skin pigmentation, and rather focus on accomplishments and talent.
She's fairly unimpressive, and if you compare her responses to Amy Barrett, it's embarrassing.
She'll get confirmed, and spend decades on the bench. But she doesn't seem intellectually serious at all, she's no Ginsburg for sure.
Hard to come acroiss as serious when you say you can't define what a woman is. Cavemen knew how to define it.
Threaded Mode