A different take on Iraq

[spence]

Originally Posted by stripersnipr

The big fallacy Radical Liberals are banking on right now is their mistaken belief that if someone is critical of Bush they are in support of the far Left Wing ideology.

You just made that up didn't you.

-spence

[stripersnipr]

Originally Posted by spence

You just made that up didn't you.

-spence

I'll take that as an aknowledgement of agreement.

[spence]

Originally Posted by stripersnipr

I'll take that as an aknowledgement of agreement.

You would be taking my comment the wrong way then. I think that's an absurd notion. Where did you get it?

-spence

[stripersnipr]

Originally Posted by spence

You would be taking my comment the wrong way then. I think that's an absurd notion. Where did you get it?

-spence

From a couple of the few wingnuts I consider friends. In their skewed view of the world Bushs Approval Ratings are validation to them that Americans in general share their beliefs. I think that explains their shock and outrage when their candidate never wins. Dont forget we are not talking about the sharpest tools in the shed here.

[Canalman]

I just don't like W and know that he's done an AWFUL job... where'd all this conspiracy jibber jabber (sorry for the Mr. T reference I couldn't help it ) come from

[stripersnipr]

Originally Posted by Canalman

I just don't like W and know that he's done an AWFUL job... where'd all this conspiracy jibber jabber (sorry for the Mr. T reference I couldn't help it ) come from

The George Soros cult.

[Bronko]

Originally Posted by stripersnipr

From a couple of the few wingnuts I consider friends. In their skewed view of the world Bushs Approval Ratings are validation to them that Americans in general share their beliefs. I think that explains their shock and outrage when their candidate never wins. Dont forget we are not talking about the sharpest tools in the shed here.

This is an extremely valid point made by Striprsniper. I honestly do think that radical liberals see those plummeting approval ratings for GW to mean the country must be "coming around" to their line of thinking. IMO the truth couldn't be further from the point.

[Skitterpop]

Originally Posted by Bronko

This is an extremely valid point made by Striprsniper. I honestly do think that radical liberals see those plummeting approval ratings for GW to mean the country must be "coming around" to their line of thinking. IMO the truth couldn't be further from the point.

Interesting....what do you and S sniper think the average American thinks about George Bush (in a abbreviated statement).

Or more concisely what is the truth, as you perceive it, regarding your last sentence above?

[stripersnipr]

Originally Posted by Skitterpop

Interesting....what do you and S sniper think the average American thinks about George Bush (in a abbreviated statement).

Or more concisely what is the truth, as you perceive it, regarding your last sentence above?

Thats easy. The lesser of two evils.

[spence]

Originally Posted by Bronko

I honestly do think that radical liberals see those plummeting approval ratings for GW to mean the country must be "coming around" to their line of thinking. IMO the truth couldn't be further from the point.

So what do you even care about a few "radical liberals" anyway? We're talking about a few percent of the population. It's not that influential of a group.

-spence

[Bronko]

Originally Posted by spence

So what do you even care about a few "radical liberals" anyway? We're talking about a few percent of the population. It's not that influential of a group.

-spence

It only takes a few. (please see "radical islam fundamentalists")

[spence]

Originally Posted by stripersnipr

From a couple of the few wingnuts I consider friends. In their skewed view of the world Bushs Approval Ratings are validation to them that Americans in general share their beliefs. I think that explains their shock and outrage when their candidate never wins. Dont forget we are not talking about the sharpest tools in the shed here.

Yes, your 2 friends represent the liberal faction in the USA

What's the margin of error on your poll, +/- 98%

I've never seen this point made by liberal thinkers on a broad scale. On individual issues there's some truth. When 50+% of the American people think they were misled into Iraq, it certainly does validate that line of thinking does it not?

As an aside, if it wern't for Bill O'Riley and Sean "jackass: Hannity, the vast majority of Americans wouldn't have a clue as to who George Soros even is, nor would they care.

-spence

[stripersnipr]

Originally Posted by spence

As an aside, if it wern't for Bill O'Riley and Sean "jackass: Hannity, the vast majority of Americans wouldn't have a clue as to who George Soros even is, nor would they care.

-spence

Wouldn't that be convienent.

[Skip N]

Originally Posted by spence

As an aside, if it wern't for Bill O'Riley and Sean "jackass: Hannity, the vast majority of Americans wouldn't have a clue as to who George Soros even is, nor would they care.

-spence

This is why the alternative media is thriving, because America now see's what people like Soros stand for, and how he plays a huge part in the Democratic party.

Without guys like Hannityy and Rush, people only see one side of the story. This is why the left cant stand the alternaive media, because they expose them for who they are and what they truly stand for.

[The Dad Fisherman]

Originally Posted by Skip N

Without guys like Hannityy and Rush, people only see one side of the story. This is why the left cant stand the alternaive media, because they expose them for who they are and what they truly stand for.

I Know, Thank God Rush exposed Micheal J Fox for the Threat to America that he really is. Damn Faker......to think I felt sorry for him all these years when he really was just playing me all along.

[The Dad Fisherman]

Originally Posted by Skip N

This is why the left cant stand the alternaive media, because they expose them for who they are and what they truly stand for.

By the Way, Great Play on words there

Definition of Naive from Websters

a:deficient in worldly wisdom or informed judgment;

[spence]

Originally Posted by Skip N

Without guys like Hannityy and Rush, people only see one side of the story. This is why the left cant stand the alternaive media, because they expose them for who they are and what they truly stand for.

Skippy, Rush and Hannity provide "entertainment" only. It's not real news, nor even real opinion.

It's a "product" that they sell.

-spence