O'bowma

[JohnnyD]

Originally Posted by Swimmer

Nothing vague at all in what I posted if you listened to any of his speeches. The new admininstration thinks that they can make a perfect world through words and legislation and it wont happen. Thank you for putting up the meanings of those two words I used. It should be more clear to you now.

More clear? It's more clear that you just throw out terms like childish and naive and don't really have actual points to support the comments.

"Nothing vague at all in what I posted if you listened to any of his speeches."
This line is exactly my point. Conservatives throw out terms and labels but then beat around the bush when it comes to supporting them.

I don't think you can provide me a single credible reason as to how he's been "childish."

[Swimmer]

Originally Posted by JohnnyD

More clear? It's more clear that you just throw out terms like childish and naive and don't really have actual points to support the comments.

"Nothing vague at all in what I posted if you listened to any of his speeches."
This line is exactly my point. Conservatives throw out terms and labels but then beat around the bush when it comes to supporting them.

I don't think you can provide me a single credible reason as to how he's been "childish."

O'Bama is naive if he thinks he has gained any respect from the europeans leaders, not the protesters, because of his negative Bush rhetoric in the last two weeks. If you don't think so you show me how he has gained respect.

My postings aren't any more or less vague than yours or anyone elses. Everyone writes broad ambiguous statements here about every little thing. If I think he is naive/childish, you prove me otherwise. Childish is putting up the meanings of the two words I used to describe O'Bama and asking me to clarify what I said. I don't have anything to prove to you or anyone else. Anyone can sit here and be a Spence clone and critique everyones postings. Go for it JohhnyD. Prove to me O'Bama isn't childish and naive and I'll post a mea culpa.

[JohnnyD]

Originally Posted by Swimmer

O'Bama is naive if he thinks he has gained any respect from the europeans leaders, not the protesters, because of his negative Bush rhetoric in the last two weeks. If you don't think so you show me how he has gained respect.

My postings aren't any more or less vague than yours or anyone elses. Everyone writes broad ambiguous statements here about every little thing. If I think he is naive/childish, you prove me otherwise. Childish is putting up the meanings of the two words I used to describe O'Bama and asking me to clarify what I said. I don't have anything to prove to you or anyone else. Anyone can sit here and be a Spence clone and critique everyones postings. Go for it JohhnyD. Prove to me O'Bama isn't childish and naive and I'll post a mea culpa.

I wasn't asking for clarification. I was asking for an example, which you couldn't provide.

The difference in most of my posts aren't some regurgitation of something I heard on the radio or FoxNews, like many people around here. When I post something, it's pretty clear when I'm stating fact (because I support it with examples) and when I'm stating an opinion.

Nothing childish putting up the definitions. Wanted to make sure any examples you provided included how Obama is "marked by or suggestive of immaturity", because I don't think there are any.

[Swimmer]

Originally Posted by JohnnyD

I wasn't asking for clarification. I was asking for an example, which you couldn't provide.

The difference in most of my posts aren't some regurgitation of something I heard on the radio or FoxNews, like many people around here. When I post something, it's pretty clear when I'm stating fact (because I support it with examples) and when I'm stating an opinion.

Nothing childish putting up the definitions. Wanted to make sure any examples you provided included how Obama is "marked by or suggestive of immaturity", because I don't think there are any.

I chose not to. What I said is readily apparent to just about anyone.