Nothing on the sexual harasser?

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

The Dems didn't hold sexual impropriety against Bill Clinton, and they sure as hell didn't hold it against Ted Kennedy. So why do personal ethics matter only with GOP candidates? I'm sorry, but even i fthe claims are true (and that's a huge "if"), I don't feel like getting lectured about morality from the party that elects Bill Clinton and Ted Kennedy. Unbelievable double standard.

Someone who makes comments about woman's looks discussing morality is hilarious. I thought the repubs. where the party of morals?

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by PaulS

Someone who makes comments about woman's looks discussing morality is hilarious. I thought the repubs. where the party of morals?

Who discussed women's looks?

God damn right we're the party of morality. So if genuinely righteous conservatives want to hold this against Cain, I'm fine with that. But when the party whose motto is "if it feels good, do it, and screw the consequences" suddenly gets selective about ethics, that's a double standard.

[scottw]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

Who discussed women's looks?

I'm sure that Paul has never made a comment about or discussed a woman's looks not that there's anything wrong with that

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

Who discussed women's looks?

God damn right we're the party of morality. So if genuinely righteous conservatives want to hold this against Cain, I'm fine with that. But when the party whose motto is "if it feels good, do it, and screw the consequences" suddenly gets selective about ethics, that's a double standard.

Rachel Madow - a week or 2 ago. Cain's ratings and donations hit record levels right after this came out. Rush, Coulter and others came right to his defense. Where is the criticism from the Rebubs.? There is the double standard. I've always said both parties are the same but Scott doesn't think so.

Originally Posted by scottw

I'm sure that Paul has never made a comment about or discussed a woman's looks not that there's anything wrong with that

Not in a public forum just because I dislike her politics. You find a picture of Madow in a bikini that she posted, then she's open game.

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by PaulS

Rachel Madow - a week or 2 ago. Cain's ratings and donations hit record levels right after this came out. Rush, Coulter and others came right to his defense. Where is the criticism from the Rebubs.? There is the double standard. I've always said both parties are the same but Scott doesn't think so.



Not in a public forum just because I dislike her politics. You find a picture of Madow in a bikini that she posted, then she's open game.

I didn't know you were talking about me...guilty as charged, Rachael Maddow is a repugnant beast, and a deranged hate-monger. I don't just dislike her politics...she is an intellectually dishonest, sniveloing coward who, like just about everyone else at that network, refuses to engage in smart people who disagree with her.

"Where is the criticism from the Rebubs.?"

Criticism for WHAT? Anonymous women who have made vague allegations? What should we do, lynch Cain on the spot?

The hypocrisy is glaring on the left, because if Cain was liberal, all the liberal jerks would be saying that he is presumed innocent. Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson would be hysterical. Liberals are extremely selective about this presumption of innocence. For example, the Duke lacrosse players (rich white jocks accused of raping a poor black girl) were villified by those "tolerant" folks on the left, right off the bat.

The other hypocrisy is the liberal notion that Bill Clinton and Ted Kennedy were worthy of public office, but Cain is not? Have fun with that...

[Karl F]

Originally Posted by PaulS

Rachel Madow You find a picture of Madow in a bikini that she posted, then she's open game.

Rachel's a boat fisherman too....

[PaulS]

Hope you weren't looking for a picure of her in bikini

[fishbones]

Originally Posted by scottw

I'm sure that Paul has never made a comment about or discussed a woman's looks not that there's anything wrong with that

Check out some old threads about Sarah Palin. I remember Paul making some comments about her looks. But it's different when it's a whack job Republican woman, so I guess it's doesn't count.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by fishbones

Check out some old threads about Sarah Palin. I remember Paul making some comments about her looks. But it's different when it's a whack job Republican woman, so I guess it's doesn't count.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Did I call her a dog, animal or something similiar?